It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
you guys dont actually understand the idea of a game, do ya?
do you cry every time a new shooter is released? wolfenstein already came out over 20 years ago, and people still "join the bandwagon".
get over it, game types are not unique.
That's not at all the same. Wolfenstein has hand-crafted PvE content for each title. It isn't just the same content relaunched.
Battle royales games are merely the game mode and PvP. They aren't unique enough from one another in terms of content to warrant having so many.
so it means we dont get force freiend whit gey or lesbo quests so game be political corect
Because those things don't happen in real life or aren't part of the world's culture. Gotcha. *facepalms*
Scellow said:None of them should have been fired, they HAVE THE FUCKING RIGHT to think / and say WHATEVER they want in their FREE TIME, if they did something illegal, or disrecpectfull, you can report tweet on twitter or give your lawyer a call
They got fired, i hope they'll sure ArenaNet, America is fucked up
You didn't provide a piece of the puzzle you provided a deceptive pile of misinformation that was written in her defense yet oddly enough it actually condemned the exact behavior she displayed. Its mind boggling how they managed to twist the issue in the article to try to portray her as the victim when she actually was the toxic online personality they condemn.I wasn't LOOKING for a neutral, unbiased article. I posted the link to yet another piece of the puzzle that has interesting discussion opportunities within its words. I like to read all sides of any argument. That makes me informed.Aeander said:The problem is that the article that you provided was yet another biased and poorly researched outside perspective of the situation which pushes the same incorrect narrative that these threads have attempted to push in their OP's.I didn't write that. I simply posted quotes from the link provided in the response I made. It's an interesting side light to the overall discussion. The people who wrote that article are not games press.Xasapis said:You know, that is interesting that you brought up gamergate (I wasn't aware of it until years). One of the /r/guildwars2 threads I was reading there was a person questioning whether gamergate was right on its assessment regarding gaming press, considering how falsely and on a script the whole situation with guildwars2 is portrait.Gaming press has indeed lost considerable relevance over the years, exactly because they chose to push ideology over the facts.The reaction towards both your editorial pieces should be an indication on how people that are not necessarily invested in Anet feel. The same contrast is there between the reaction of Guildwars2 players and the gaming press.The bottom line was that the CEO of Anet had to choose between appeasing the players or the press. I think he made the right choice, but time will tell.
I don't have an opinion so let's not sling shade please. It's been a very reasonable discussion and I hope it stays that way.
@mmrv Again - I did NOT write that, simply provided a link and two quotes from the larger piece. Keep it civil, please.
If you had wanted an actual neutral, comprehensive, level-headed analysis of the situation, you would have linked Woodenpotatoes' 57 minute video on the topic.