It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
You make no sense. How is what I posted "showing they are making money" vs "losing money"? Development is always a loss making proposition. Stop making assumption just because someone is not in your circle-jerk.GeezerGamer said:You are trying to show they are making money. They aren't. They are losing money. Stable development? How long do you think that will continue? Indefinitely? By all accounts, there has been next to no developmental progress worth talking about. If there was, Caspian would be saying that much. So how long will this revenue continue to stream in as these updates continue to reveal issues compounded by developmental delays?
And there is another thing. Everything Caspian has said so far has been out of touch with reality.
So once again, saying "Stable Development" is what I would call straight up bull shit. There's nothing stable about SBS.
Certainly but the non-griefers are not the ones getting the heavy penalties when they do get killed. Also the non-griefers are more likely to be in populated areas. It is not like everyone is standing in the wild randomly. You have to look at the system holistically.Slapshot1188 said:And the way I read it... he believed the inability to log out only applied to "griefers". If that were the case then YES it would penalize them. Instead... as I stated in your quoted post: Nobody can log out. So Seamus McCrotchface is going to have a target rich environment.StaalBurgher said:Hmm... I think he was moaning that it would be too hard on griefers!