Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!




Last Active
Favorite Role
  • Why Is Blizzard Inviting Former Warcraft 3 Pros to Anaheim? Warcraft 3 Remastered? - MMORPG.com New

    Wizardry said:

    Even Wow from day 1 i said that game looks like crap and i was playing FFXI at the time so that says a lot about how bad that Warcraft engine is.
    So that brings us to the topic of remastered,no question that would make ANY of the Warcraft games look better,i mean how could it not.So do i care about a remaster or a new Warcraft 4?

    Well i'll say i actually enjoyed the Warcraft movie,so if they could forget all their lazy gimmicks like Esports and leagues and selling cards and heroes and make an actual HQ game i might consider a W4 to be exciting news.

    However,every single last game in Blizz's portfolio to me is crap,not worth my time,so if it is a remaster,not interested at all,if a HQ Warcraft 4 game better than what i have seen them do,then yes it could be exciting.

    welcome to my ignore list - you are a broken record and a bitter person
  • Purported Alpha Footage Shows Battle for Azeroth Locations of Undercity & Zuldazar - World of Warcra

    It's pretty much just a rehash of what we've seen before, which is the big issue with making trolls a big part of an expansion. I'd have preferred and expansion off of azeroth, maybe with the excuse of finding ways to defeat the void in a future expansion. That way they could introduce lots of new races and environments. This feels very lazy
  • Least excited iv ever been for a wow expansion

    I'd say it's in a tie with pandaria for me but pandaria suffered because it was the second filler expansion in a row.  This expansion looks like a "been there, done that" type of thing.
  • New Ship - Introductory Price of $850

    SEANMCAD said:
    Residev said:
    SEANMCAD said:
    Residev said:
    SEANMCAD said:
    Residev said:
    SEANMCAD said:
    I have a picture of a bridge to sell you...

    1. its not a purchase its a donation.
    ... "PS - promise this will be your some day, xoxo, Roberts."
    to be fair, it could very well turn out to be better than anything Electronic Arts has ever done.
    how about that idea?
    Why step from one extreme to the other?....

    because its been working that is why.

    I dont know if SC has been working or not but I am telling you the non-publisher approach as been gangbusters crazy mega successful. It has literally made my gaming experience in this era the best ever in my 37 years of gaming. So as such, until there is massive failure I say lets give new ideas (instead of old bad ones) a chance.

    more over, you do believe in market principles when it comes to entertainment products? if its not going to work people will not buy them. that is economics 101

    meanwhile I am playing Empyrion - Galactic Survival  thank you very much

    I agree. Non-publisher approach sounds awesome. It IS awesome. Until someone comes and ruins it for everybody.....
    I had to stop right there. SC is one fucking game, if they tank it not going to have much of an effect on the successes or future success of what is happening in the industry today.


    we cant go around micro-managing every developer in the industry in some anti-capitalist approach because we are afraid that one fucking game could ruin all of them because of the cost of a digital item
    If SC shuts down before meeting their promises, it will have a catastrophic impact on the high budget crowd funded video game market.
  • 3.0 Spoilers From An Evocati

    It reads like it was written by a CIG dev ...