It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
For single player titles I think Ubisoft would be a great fit. They're big enough to tack the IP but still willing to make single player games.Aeander said:I'd be okay with Ubisoft. They certainly have their major flaws, but at least they aren't entirely risk averse. Namely, a single player Star Wars game could have actually seen the light of day under Ubisoft.
I'm about the opposite. If they only have cosmetics and no advantage items, I'm out. I'm sick and tired of being the only demographic funding mmos.Rhygarth said:I hope both games do well and i will try both but if there is 1 item in the cash shop that even remotely adds a slight advantage i will uninstall, I am done with all the p2w bullshit in mmo's and that even goes for stupid pets that loot for you...
See that's where your cultural myopia is getting in the way. It's had a huge influence in China which has become one of the largest global MMO markets today. It had more players than EQ and DAoC combined and has driven Chinese mmo development.koldmiser said:
He is talking on a global level not just a NA one. EQ had little impact outside of NA. Whereas Lineage(rarely ever counted on this site) affected far more and had a much broader reach, as he said, it spurred a new market in that region which exploded in popularity and spread even to our neck of the woods.
Not trying to start a fight, but if he was really talking on a global level then "Fantasy Westward Journey (2004)" wouldn't be on that list as it had zero impact outside of Asia.
Well, I wish that SBFord took the legitimate criticisms of the MMORPG readers more to heart sometimes (I have never, in following this website for years, seen her not get extremely defensive when anyone questions the reporting or morality of stories here, often just insulting the posters intelligence by talking down to them rather than trying to explain her position or reasoning) I am glad that MMORPG decided to unveil this as a scam.
It's incredible that providing information means that there is no need for the reporter to investigate, read further, look at the information you are presenting and decide whether what you are doing is right. Just read anything and put it up on the feed, I suppose. If MMORPG wants to take a loose definition of news and take no responsibility for what is posted or how the information might be construed, then at least it's good to know that when reading the "news" here now.
That would be an investigative editorial and not a news event story. They reported on a critical editorial. It's never good enough for some people. Always with their edgy pithy sleights disguised as the voice of reason.
C o m e o n!! The one who report the News is held responsible for the authenticity of the News. mmorpg.com didn't quote another News site ( like they did here ). They reported directly from the source. That is the problem. But hey! Is like you want this site to throw any shit of "News".