I miss playing EQ and DAOC pre2004... back when you could have an hour long discussion ONLY talking about the game (not a word said about real life) that has nothing to do with a DPS meter, boss phases or who sucks. I miss those days when the world …
Originally posted by biggarfoot Now GW2 is a couple of months old and without taking away Anets glory of a successful game despite its faults, will we see a major developer look on it and do it better?
I enjoyed levelling up my character and disco…
Originally posted by rungard There are a couple of issues here.
EQ next will have raiding in some form. Whether that is traditional raiding or worldmob raids or something else is unknown. Traditionally eq style raids made all the best items in the…
Originally posted by Telil Lets put this "eq was the origonal themepark" argument to bed with a simple fact.
There was no such term in mmo's as themepark back in 1999 and i challenge each one of you to find one.
EQ had a big open world that did …
Originally posted by Adamai
i seriously doubt it will be bigger than eve - online world. that game is truely emmence in scale. over 6500 systems/shards each system being a around 20-40 au in diameter. thats 6500 areas. no game has that. and shoul…
Originally posted by rungard Originally posted by Neanderthal
When he says that they aren't going to a skill based system in that quote I take that to mean classes and levels. If it's not skill based and it's not level based then what el…
What is to be shocked about? It costs the same as any other MMORPG released in the past 5 years except without a subscription cost ontop of it. People are really grasping at straws here....
CE, i've bought every CE of every MMO i've played from WoW and EQ2, to SWG, to Warhammer to Starwars, Definitely getting GW2's. ESPECIALLY because i won't be paying a monthly sub, they deserve a nice big upfront box cost.
$150 for CE with no f…
Originally posted by stragen001 FFS, what is it with GW2 fanboys flaming anything and everything that isnt GW2 at the moment.
Mass Effect 3 has to be one of the best games I have ever played. Its a toss up between ME3 and Skyrim.
If ME3 is so …
Originally posted by m0lly
Originally posted by Eir_S
Yeah, it "encourages" guilds/individuals to decide to gang up on players who are trying to enjoy the game and not assert their phallic dominance on everyone else. There are plenty of game…
Originally posted by Meowhead
Originally posted by IPolygon
Read what he wrote again. With the current combat system you'd constantly make foes and friends. You could even harm everyone with projectiles flying around, because they can be …
Originally posted by itgrowls So i have to laugh at the pvp people defending their right to gank "noobs"
let me just remind you people that the whole POINT of GW2 according to the Devs actions with this game's design is to eliminate all of the ne…
What irks me is that the Day 1 DLC... is actually included ON THE DISK that you payed for, its just not unlocked. So literally you're paying $10 to get the physical game you already payed $60 for, unlocked.
Some ideas (stolen ideas) that could maybe make an FFA server pretty fun and interesting.
*
Server wouldnt be on the Elo-Bi Weekly server list.
*
The servers guilds fight eachother over Keep/Objective controls (would have to increase …
Some people don't think that forced alliances and implied PvE safety is the "best of both worlds". FFA encourages player politics on a Guild / Individual level as opposed to assuming everyone to be on your side.