If this adds a great deal of landmass or whatever and a bunch of features to ships, I WOULD count that as an expansion.
Unlike the last patch Darkfall got.
Personally, I'd suggest that Darkfall as a whole is removed from this site until AV stop this bullshit, but that's probably just me. I mean, I see no difference between this and any of the Evony advertising.
Originally posted by Pyrostasis
What the hell are you folks complaining about?
Most games do this, WoW, EvE, LOTRO, EQ2, WAR, etc etc... the only difference is, AV gives you 10 bucks, the other games give you a free month of gameplay (15 bucks).
…
Originally posted by Kasmos
Implementing a program that rewards players for bringing new people in, gives Aventurine more money for development, AND increases world populations is a sign of desperation?
Uh.... how? It's obvious they're implementing…
Originally posted by DarthRaiden
Where does such a discussion leads ? even if you know the exact number what conclusions you like to draw from it ?
What will u use the number for and what should it show you ?
"I'm worried that these numbers w…
Originally posted by Astralglide
The slippery slope argument is flawed. Just because you can buy vanity items doesn't mean that they are switching to a full-scale RMT. I'm pretty sure that most of their players would not stay for that (myself inc…
Originally posted by Axehilt
Games people like instead of games a tiny minority likes? Sounds suspiciously successful.
And, yet, we see time and time again that those sort of games become failures of their own sort. Appealing to a minority is c…
Originally posted by Astralglide
Well, then those of us who will not stay for RMT and will leave the game. I love WoW, and people can buy all the special mounts and pets that they want as long as what they can buy doesn't affect gameplay and give…
Originally posted by clik
Well this thread took a turn down weird lane. This is now about the analysis and thought provoking discussion of whether Hitler is evil or not.
Seriously, thread got Godwinson'd within a page.
Originally posted by Caleveira
Thanks Eben.
I'll have to agree that whatever Hitler's state of mind (his mental derangement is well documented) he was nonetheless responsible for his actions (we wouldn't consider him legally insane even today) and …
Originally posted by Scalebane
Wow some people are delusional if they think Activision-Blizzard is more evil then SOE.
EA is still worse then SOE in buying and destroying game companies though, i can't believe how stupid these studios are to kee…
There's a reason RPing worked in UO. The game was large enough to keep players seperate, but players could still stumble across each other accidentally. Nevermind the fact that the community as a whole was very accepting of roleplayers, and your ave…
Originally posted by Caleveira
Was the Hitler thing edited out? I couldn't find it myself...
Evil is a word that shouldn't be thrown around so often as it takes away from the impact the term should hold when speaking of the real deal (yes, Hitler…
Originally posted by nAAtimus
Sleazy is a much better term.
Sleazy would be selling knock off food for cheap in a back alley somewhere, evil is forcing a monopoly on food through morally sceptical business practices and then scoffing at the peo…
Originally posted by zymurgeist
Your clown shoes are showing.
The Bad Behavior
Industry sources say, though, that other gaming companies don't feel quite so positively toward Kotick – in particular, that such a cash-flush company is leaving it…
Originally posted by Loricane
Not sure how either of those companies are evil, exactly.
SOE has made -horrible- games, yes, but that just makes them a poor business. Blizzard created a very successful MMO and manages it poorly.
So...unless t…