Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!




Last Active
Favorite Role
  • Subscribe to play is as bad as pay to win

    Best option is buy to play with 30 days free trial.

    Not everyone is rich like american. Especially south east asia players. 
    Pay to win?  You must be referring to free-to-play with a pay-to-win cash shop.  And what is Buy-to-Play with a 30-day free trial?  If the game is Buy-to-Play, there's no required subscription, so where does the free trial come in?

    I'm assuming you realize that people who publish games expect to make money at some point.  So it's going to be a subscription model or it's going to have a cash shop, or some hybrid of the two.  Pick which one you like.  Personally, I much prefer the subscription model.
  • UPDATED: Nost Team Makes Good On Threat To Release The Server Code - World of Warcraft - MMORPG.com

    Don't care - Legion is the best WoW has ever been. No need for Vanillia nostalgia, or its rose tinted glasses.
    No, it isn't.  Some people actually do prefer older versions of the game.  It's not that they remember the game as being better but it actually wasn't, it's that it was a better game for some players, warts and all.  I'm not sure why it's so hard for otherwise intelligent people to recognize that there are preferences that differ from their own.
  • Blizzard Cleaning House - Win-Traders in PvP BGs Permabanned - World of Warcraft - MMORPG.com

    Win-trading is the dumbest thing ever.  People who have to cheat in a game to win don't understand the point of a game.
  • The Legion Pre-Patch and My Return to Azeroth - Bill Murphy

    I'll be back when they implement Legacy servers and not before.
  • Obsidian Entertainment Wants Your Input About DLC & Its Games - General News

    The best DLC is no DLC. Make a complete game and if you want to expand upon it then create an entire expansion and sell that, like how it was back in the days of Baldur's Gate and Icewind Dale.
    rojoArcueidJamar870Asm0deusSlapshot1188AlomarYaevinduskIselinxDarkjoyinfomatzHiromantand 6 others.
  • World of Warcraft - It's Been a Big Week Since the Launch of 7.3.5 - Let's Catch Up - MMORPG.com

    They made leveling even more of a chore. All the old content is boring as hell. Now we have to crawl our way out of hell to get to Legion. Thanks Blizzard. Really a great leveling experience! Or lack of...

    Disagree. Pre-patch is when leveling was a chore. Being able to insta-kill every monster and outleveling every zone before you complete half the quests is ridiculous, but that is what leveling in WoW has been for years. The only benefit of having it that way was that it was fast. It was the quintessential leveling treadmill; a boring, mindless grind, where every monster falls over before you can hit your third ability. But it was faster. Still, I'd rather have it like it is now. Slower, but mildly interesting at least. It would be more interesting if the monsters posed more of a threat, but at least the design is headed in the right direction for the first time in years.
    MadFrenchiejosko9laseritkitaradCazrielgamer2025Torvalk61977ZamuroMrMelGibsonand 4 others.
  • Okay WTF is a MMO? Really?

    I don't get why people are confused by this.  The definition is straight forward enough:

    "A massively multiplayer online game (MMOG or MMO) is an online game which is capable of supporting large numbers of players, typically from hundreds to thousands, simultaneously in the same instance (or world)."


    If it doesn't meet that criteria, it's not a MMO.  There's nothing to debate here.
    ConstantineMerusStoneRosesScorchienMaurgrimEldurianCecropiaGdemamiPhrycraftseekerExcessionand 3 others.
  • Valve to Be More Active to Prevent Malicious Review Bombs - MMORPG.com News

    majinant said:

    Usually bombs when they change something like adding P2W crap into their game. That isn't malicious, that's just what happens when you decide to fuck over your player base.

    During the last Summer Steam sale, Paradox games artificially increased the prices off all their games prior to putting them "on sale", and they paid a high price in negative reviews as a result of that fuckery. In my opinion, the price they paid was warranted by their actions.
    KyleranMrMelGibsonmajinantGorweAsm0deusSlapshot1188Octagon7711bartoni33AlomarAnthurand 2 others.
  • The positive CoE challenge:

    There isn't a game yet, so your "challenge" is just a bad joke, but I'm sure you know that already, and are, as usual, just trying to stir the pot some more.  As soon as there's a game to play (assuming it ever gets finished), I'll list everything I like and don't like about it for you while you're no doubt still explaining to everyone why it's bad and they shouldn't appreciate it.

    People calling you out on your relentless attacks against a video game still in production are not necessarily "Defenders of CoE" as you put it.  Sometimes it's just defending basic decency.  After a certain point, the crusade you're on is nothing more than bullying a developer into taking your bait and when they do you savor every word of their flippant response and use it as more dirt to pile on.  It's interesting that a lot of people here seem to admire it.  I think there's nothing admirable about it at all.
    GdemamiCellandineYashaXkillimandrosmystichazeGeekyWarLord2424blackbobb12CantPlayHockeyCheshireCatt24and 1 other.
  • Developer seems frustrated that publishers don't understand CoE's appeal

    So what are you going to talk about when CoE is gone?  Relentlessly bashing this game is clearly your favorite hobby.  I'm at the point now where I hope it fails just so you'll shut the fuck up about it.