It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Yes there's a lot of that. It's a big reason why the community is viewed as rather toxic.Octagon7711 said:Why you see my observations as arguments I will never know. You said my observations were wrong. How did I argue with you about that? Why pick fights with me?
One thing I've noticed is that the people who are against SC tend to be more civil then those who are for it. Perhaps it says something about the type of people the game is attracting.
Erillion said:In one of the previous documents it was said that CIG did offer something to CryTek, but CryTek did not want it. Presumably they wanted more. After CryTek refused to accept it, it may be that CIG stopped offering it (because CryTek would not accept it anyway). And with the switch to Lumberyard there was no longer a reason to offer anything to CryTek.
CIG agreed to send bug fixes. Not code changes. I assume CryTek expected to get all the code changes "for free" (well, CryTek may have assumed that the (presumably ?) low (?) buyout price that CIG paid for the whole code was basically the price to get the code changes ... but it is not explicitly mentioned in the contract, so CIG did not feel obliged to send it ... which pissed of CryTek). Sounds like the three brothers thought they outsmarted CIG ... and thought wrong.