Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
The Outer Worlds Hands-On Preview
System
Member UncommonPosts: 12,599
The Outer Worlds Hands-On Preview
The Outer Worlds is the latest game to soon be hitting the digital video game shelves for acclaimed studio Obsidian Entertainment. Recently, MMORPG had a chance to check out Obsidian's upcoming game at a press event - check out our preview of The Outer Worlds!
Comments
Vault-Tec analysts have concluded that the odds of worldwide nuclear armaggeddon this decade are 17,143,762... to 1.
Thank you for your time!
Steam has a lot of faults, but it's not a monopoly. It's dominant and we need real competition, but Epic is not it. It's not consumer-friendly and their business practices are pretty bad.
Logic, my dear, merely enables one to be wrong with great authority.
Why? Obsidian Entertainment & Private Division had no problem jumping midstream when & which platforms it would be selling on after the initial announcement for a cash-grab so any article dealing with the multiple facets of this game including it's various platforms & when it will be sold on are relevant along with every other aspect of the game good or bad. The Outer Worlds companies chose to do it so reap the rewards & consequences that go along with that decision of money over ethics, so suck it up buttercup.
That's like people saying Google isn't a search engine monopoly. It is and so is steam. And to dethrone a monopoly - which is supported by rabid fans who have no care about markets or impacts on products, consumers, developers, and other stakeholders - sometimes you have to engage in practices that some may not like. I think its amusing the people complaining about their business practices all just happen to be people pissed some games they like are not going to steam or having delayed releases on steam. 100% correlation that I've seen so far.
I support any competitor to google as I support any competitor to steam. I have no idea why people are so into and love monopolies now, especially ones that support speech suppression and engage in extremely shady business practices only monopolies can, while causing harm to industries only monopolies can.
거북이는 목을 내밀 때 안 움직입니다
Don't really care about EGS existing, but I do care about the way they've gone handling that store. Steam really does need some competition.
It is sold in Humble Bundle as well. A portion of those sells go to charity and then a portion to Humble Bundle, and then finally a portion to Obsidian. So...that's the best option in my opinion.
It is those little ideas that really turn me off,i wouldn't be able to enjoy a game with a mode that turns combat into easy mode.
I watched a video,it actually looks pretty cheap to me.
The weapon models look low end,the combat is very simple and yes the bullet time makes it way simpler.
My very first impression,looks like a weaker version of Tabula Rasa.Some corridors that force you into a linear direction and a sort of forced combat,just not a well designed looking game,looks more like a rush job.
Opinion...would definitely not even consider buying it,wouldn't play it if you gave it to me for free because there is nothing new or unique or even interesting,all been there done that before.
Never forget 3 mile Island and never trust a government official or company spokesman.
Im buying mine from where I get most of my games, my local games store, which employs 4 people.
fyi, fallout had REAL success starting with part 3 ^^
first 2 parts are basically only referenced for bragging reasons among players ("ERRR PLERD FELLERT ONE...ERRR!")
and we all know who did FO3.
"I'll never grow up, never grow up, never grow up! Not me!"
I like the early ones and the Bethesda ones, but saying 1 and 2 were less popular when less people played PC games doesn't really state anything.
.. and you can't forget that Obsidian did New Vegas, which is considered the best Fallout game overall.