It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
It’s may just be the year of Bloody Gaming. This year, the accessory maker is releasing peripherals intent on bringing them into the spotlight like never before. We saw some of their new gear at CES and were impressed, but it was their new keyboards that most caught our eye. Today, we’re looking at the B975, Bloody’s new full-size RGB keyboard, complete with a new and improved optical switch that’s easily their best yet.
Comments
RomerG switches from Logitech beg to differ - they are quiet, stable and IMO feel much better than LK switches due to each RomerG being lubricated internally at the factory (which LK switches are not). Also LK is a MX based design, while RomerGs is a completely different switch designed from ground up
As far as next generation of switches goes after the old and tired MX switches - I think that RomerGs are a clear leader
Also not that it matters to me, but RomerG's have by far the best lighting solution - all light comes through the keycap and there is no light bleed underneath and around each key.
If something was paid for it will say sponsored in the title on this site.
A lot of the key switches are the same between boards, but the circuitry behind it with x-key rollover is not. The same is true with deck extensions and wrist rests. That doesn't mean Razer or Logitech made them or have anything to do with them. It's just not true.
This boards main deck is ANSI. The eight buttons in the upper right are not, but that is a very standard configuration for all board makers to use when they want to add additional functionality while still being able to advertise compliance. Compliance is attractive to mech keyboard users because they can buy third party keycaps they know will work and fit. There's a little more to it than that, but that's the core of it.
traveller, interloper, anomaly, iteration
Similar layout but IMO that Logitech is FAR better due to RomerG switches.
The downside to RomerGs - nobody is making replacement keycaps - so you can't get nice doubleshot thick PBTs and put them on - so you are stuck with Logitech's factory ABS keycaps.
But still - I am a huge fan of Romer Gs Here's what a Romer G looks like -
As you can see - there is no middle "stem" like MX switches have or on this keyboard LK switches, Romer Gs are super stable. The LED is in the middle so no light bleed from under or around the key.
traveller, interloper, anomaly, iteration
traveller, interloper, anomaly, iteration
We always say if it is sponsored and /or if the item was provided by the manufacturer for review.
Let me say this slowly: We. Do. Not. Get. Paid. For. Articles. Without. Labeling. Them. EVER.
Loathe as I am to say it because of the ease some throw it out there, your insinuations are "fake news".
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Switch construction isn't the same. Deck construction isn't the same between major vendors. Some cheap boards using the same manufacturer and generic parts doesn't prove your point again. It just proves that cheap knockoffs are cheap knockoffs.
In a chip fab the output depends on the vendor. Having a dedicated manufacturer for a specific type of hardware doesn't mean that hardware coming out of it is all the same parts. So even in a case where a vendor might use the same production facilities doesn't imply they use the same parts. If that service is offered by the manufacturer it doesn't mean every vendor produces that way.
That is why your whole point is a misleading lie. People like you enjoy oversimplifying a truth until it can be twisted to inappropriately support a mistruth. That is where alt-facts (lies) are generated from. Your half-truths don't tell the entire story and stereotyping the entire industry like that is a misleading lie.
traveller, interloper, anomaly, iteration
That's likely where the offense taken comes from.
Maybe I wasn't clear enough. I wasn't talking about normal mechanical key switches. It was referring specifically to the last generation of Light Strike switches in the area of looseness.
By appearances, perhaps - though I kind of doubt it. What logitech are you referring to?
Our reviews are not paid for. Suzie and the rest of that bristle at questions like that because it is a very common throw-out to try to diminish what we do here when the commenter doesn't want to take the time (or doesn't have the ability to) make a reasoned argument.
When it comes to hardware, we receive review samples like every other outlet because it would be insane to budget for every item we wanted to try and share our thoughts on. No outlet is buying all their own hardware with very rare exceptions. Any item we are sent is disclosed at the end of the review, as it is in this one.
But, given that hardware isn't the main focus this site was built on, companies would be insane to pay us over a hardware dedicated site. Speaking from my experience and talking to other hardware writers, there isn't money changing hands for reviews unless it's a sponsored series, at least in any case I've heard of. Maybe it happens, but if it does, it won't happen here.
Fun fact: the place that's most likely to happen? YouTube and Twitch. Not "old guard" written media where we have ethics policies to abide by. Even then, I'm dubious, because most non-associated YouTubers are going to be happy to get something for free, which may in itself go a long way to swaying opinion. Why would you bribe a streamer when just giving them the thing is probably going to do it anyway? We've been doing this for long enough, where getting a sample isn't anything new. It's just how it's done, that's all. Contrary to what you hear a lot of in comments, the verified cases of money for positive coverage recently all been tied to YouTube.
Advertising and editorial are kept separate always. The only people even talking to companies when it comes to hardware reviews are typically Bill and I, and that's to arrange coverage and communicate links to the review, ask questions, that kind of thing. In other words, to do our job as editors.
Those are honest answers to what you say are honest questions, and I hope it gives some context to how things work.
I understand you're standing up for your writer but contrary to what you might think, not everyone who questions your advertising methods is someone who doesn't want to take the time or doesn't have the ability to make a reasoned argument. It does, however, give clear insight into your thoughts on your own readers. In case you weren't aware, it doesn't mention that the device has been paid for by the manufacturer until you read the full article, and even then it's at the end of it. My point wasn't that you were actually getting paid to write it, but that you were only writing about the ones that are sent to you.
Someone else posted that there are a lot of keyboards out there, so what are the ones you review based on? Because it seems like, from what you've said, that you review the ones people pay for and send you because "It's just how it's done, that's all." So while this may be old hat for you, not everyone trusts reviews that come from products given for free since it tends to bias the reviewers thoughts, reviewers being human and all. That's why in Steam reviews the label is placed at the top of the review. This is an honest response to what you say are honest answers, and I hope it gives you some context to how things work.
PS: It would be great if it wasn't necessary to edit html in order to respond to a post.
Keep in mind that in pretty much every case of a bad review, those games and peripherals were also given for free. In those instances you have to weigh the integrity of the writers more-so than peoples' love of getting free stuff.
Now it's completely possible to see a "sponsored" review, but those are completely different. Those play more like a commercial. But that being said, reviews of any kind should be taken with a grain of salt, as any review worth it's weight is written with more than just facts, but the writers perception of the product.
I don't know how many times I've seen responses on articles where the writer was deemed as "Biased" or "paid off" because they liked something that someone else (who mostly hasn't tried it) disliked it. It's just the nature of reviews, no matter where you see them, and some are valid criticisms, I just think a lot of people can't tell the difference between sites that disclose the information like MMORPG, and sites with less integrity.
We have been around for 15+ years and I personally can assure you that we have never taken money for a piece of content that we did not clearly label as sponsored. Even this we only started doing in the past few years.
- MMORPG.COM Staff -
The dead know only one thing: it is better to be alive.
I completely agree. I was not even in the market for a new keyboard as I had bought one last year on a suggestion from @Torval yet when I put my hands on the Logitech G910 Spectrum I was sold in an instant. This keyboard is the best I have owned. The key response is lightening quick. Quicker than any keyboard I have used. It even influenced me to move over to the Logitech Proteus Spectrum mouse as well. Logitech has really great software to go along with their devices.
Having the light come strictly through the keycaps and not bleeding through is something I didn't even know I wanted nor cared about until I had it. Awesome product.
거북이는 목을 내밀 때 안 움직입니다
traveller, interloper, anomaly, iteration
While true I could search for the reviews, unsurprisingly I come here primarily to scratch the surface of MMORPG news the same way I go to specialized outlets for reviews such as TheTruthAboutGuns.com.. This is no TheTruthAboutKeyboards.