Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
Kingdom Come Deliverance, too good to be true ?
delete5230
Member EpicPosts: 7,081
Kingdom Come Deliverance,
Do you think it will be everything it clams. Do you think it will be filled with bugs ?
Here's the latest video from yesterday:
Do you think it will be everything it clams. Do you think it will be filled with bugs ?
Here's the latest video from yesterday:
Comments
I'd say the biggest gripe people will have with it will be the combat and the gameplay driven by realism (not casual fun), it's not for everyone.
거북이는 목을 내밀 때 안 움직입니다
"The Society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting by fools."
Currently: Games Audio Engineer, you didn't hear what I heard, you heard what I wanted you to hear.
Just something to talk about until we have an mmorpg. For now we only have cash shops.
I do appreciate that they try to make the game an authentic replication of that era.
Too bad it's medieval otherwise i would likely give it a try.
Never forget 3 mile Island and never trust a government official or company spokesman.
It seems reminiscent of older RPGs in many ways. It felt less polished and packaged than games like Witcher 3, asking the player to explore the systems more. The story is likely what will make it of break it.
I expect it to be a nice game in its niche genre. I don’t expect it to be a transformative game that flat out beats every other recent RPG.
List of concerns in order:
1) Very short and small game
2) Buggy as hell
3) Everything predictable
Or it could be a gem and set a new bar.
This game is definitely the type to wait-and-see. It could be a bad idea to jump on this one without reviews and testimonial's.
No having houses to decorate, no epic things to explore, no huge map to explore (map is quite a bit smaller than Skyrim)...it isn't like elder scrolls or Ultima 7 where you feel like you can live in the world. All it is, is following the characters story.
Personally I was hoping for a more semi-sandbox game. There aren't very many games like Ultima 7 where you truly can live in the game world, and all the NPCs do their own thing with super advanced AI.
And from what I seen, AI in kingdom come is pretty terrible...nothing like the interactive/immersive NPCs of Skyrim or Witcher 3 or even Ultima 7 which is decades old and has better immersive AI than most.
This will be a hard skip for me. Not my type of game at all. I like a story and all, but I like games where I can live in the game world. Hence why I still play MMOs because many are like that.
My Skyrim, Fallout 4, Starbound and WoW + other game mods at MODDB:
https://www.moddb.com/mods/skyrim-anime-overhaul
If this is true, then it's what I kind of expected.
Something about the situations you get yourself into gave signs it's linear. Since the situations were detailed, this gives me the feeling the world and game itself is small or at least much smaller than Skyrim.
The part were you can change armor for the situation makes it seem detailed, but at that point in the possible short game it could be expected. Since they stress doing this, it may only be an illusion that the game is deep, and an illusion that you will be doing it all the time.
Everything about this game seems tight lipped and nothing negative, only hype (no real reviews).
At the very least, it's a step in the right directions for next generation combat. However I'm not crazy about first person either.
No way will I run out and buy, it's a wait-and-see !!!
For me that sounds more like a living world.
This is why I say this game is only for some people, it might look shiny and all but it is a simulator and that is prioritized on how the game flows.
If we're going to "keep it real" players should be required to take off about 8 layers every 4 hours or so to take care of "privy" duties.
C'mon now, let's not be easy mode sissy boys here, real gamers want to wipe!
With leaves of course, no Charmin in my virtual game worlds.
"True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde
"I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant
Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm
Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV
Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon
So for me is easy, if you don't care for realism and just want to have a more casual fun, then it's good to stay away from simulators, it's like the difference between COD and ARMA.
It's pretty much the same type of game with a different approach to gameplay, driving its appeal to what type of gameplay appeals more to the mainstream audience in genres as the FPS or even space sim.
I'm not stating any "rule" as to how this works, just that specifically to the type of game such as this one, it falls more on a niche because of gameplay driven by realism making it likely it won't be capable to hit the mainstream audience like a game as Skyrim did.
However for a rpg setting,yes 3rd is best but i prefer CHOICE in a rpg,i want both.
I think the reason for first person is obvious,i would not hold that against the game.I mean on a very similar note,so many like to make excuses for low end graphics,i heard them all when comes to Wow.
I will tell you something else about pvp and 3rd person,it allows players to CHEAT utilizing the camera.If you are a true pvp player you will understand what i am talking about.Third person is also a FAKE viewing idea,it is only needed in rpg's because we have so much to see around us,especially if doing some 24-48 man raid.
Never forget 3 mile Island and never trust a government official or company spokesman.