Lord British DID offer a vial of his blood, but they did not let him ;-)
Have fun
They kicked him off eBay for trying to auction his blood so he sold it on his own website, 10 vials of blood, 5 were his and 5 belonged to his producer.
one ship 1000 bucks a piece a land 100$ times ten 1000$
the look on there face when its all made illegal .....PRICE LESS
I don't think it will be illegal, at least if they put it right. Getting bonuses for funding an upcomming game is not the same thing as selling random lootboxes, there is no gambling involved.
That said, rewarding too good stuff for funding a game is dangerous if they want to have more customers then just the ones funding it (then again, they are making the game for those people).
I think if some legal action will be taken against cashshop items or lootboxes a lot will depend on the wording. Offering a super pay2win ship as a reward for people that pledge a certain amount of cash is almost impossible to forbid but selling loose items is far easier.
What do people want with the hair BTW? Clone their own Lord British?
Seems they just have put SC cause it's popular, not because it even compares to funding methods that fall on microtransactions such as SOTA's or even CoE. To talk about buying land and ignore the existence of Entropia Universe is just wtf.
The argumentation of "selling stuff before it even exists" for SC (in the funding kickstart nature of it) yet give a free pass to season passes? hmmm
Maybe perhaps, CR will start selling his blood, then we can talk.
one ship 1000 bucks a piece a land 100$ times ten 1000$
the look on there face when its all made illegal .....PRICE LESS
Why would it be made illegal?
Loot boxes based on RNG are what was being investigated and potentially made illegal in Belgium.
That's because RNG loot boxes where real money is involved is gambling which is a strictly regulated industry and illegal without the proper permission.
In Star Citizen you get exactly what you pay for so, it's your own dumb fault if you paid $1000 for some digital ship that the rest of us will obtain, by playing in game, with relative ease in all likelihood.
The problem with funding SC and games like it, is that they are getting all their money now. They'll have nothing left to offer at the time of release so what will they do then? Sell more ships I guess, they won't be making money any way otherwise.
Check out this $14,000.00 digital bundle that includes a lock of Lord British hair. SC has nothing on SotA when it comes to useless microtransactions.
NO FUCKING WAY! LOL ))
Reporter: What's behind Blizzard success, and how do you make your gamers happy? Blizzard Boss: Making gamers happy is not my concern, making money.. yes!
Seems they just have put SC cause it's popular, not because it even compares to funding methods that fall on microtransactions such as SOTA's or even CoE. To talk about buying land and ignore the existence of Entropia Universe is just wtf.
Maybe perhaps, CR will start selling his blood, then we can talk.
Is it niche or is it popular? Here is an example of where people pick and choose which they want to call it.
End of the day this project that might someday be a game ISNT that popular despite all the numbers of 'citizens' you want to cite. The money they have made is basically 99% micro transaction. Although I think they could call some of them macro since the prices are so ridiculous. So they could more than likely rename the list itself the 'Star Citizen award for most aggregious micro transaction pay to win concept ever thought of'.
As for the guy saying you get what you pay for...ummmm no you dont I dont think half the Jpegs they have sold have been pixelated into ships in the game yet. So its a gamble just hoping they someday get around to it.
I am sure someone has the list but I would like to know the 'oldest' jpeg they have sold that hasnt yet been made. Is it 2 years? 3 years? One of the first ones?
Either way Star Citizen epitomizes predatory selling.
Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm
Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV
Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon
Its actually a list of "dubious" micro transaction practices, and only lists the land sales, not the ships.
Ah, that makes sense. Like I've mentioned in those other threads, unlike ships (for the most part), it's impossible for them to know for sure if they can even guarantee they'll have that land they're selling be available. Archeage and Ultima Online and everything else were unable to provided noninstanced land for everyone either so selling land before land even exists is an extremely dubious practice, made worse by how you don't even know the quality of what you're getting because some players might get better land spots than others depending on who finds them first even if everyone paid the same $50 for a plot.
Of course, there's a lot of open ended things up in the air for ships too (exactly how good will they be and perform are unanswerable questions when the game's still mostly just concept for example). Land just has way more than that, especially with how complex and in-depth Star Citizen is making its housing and land system compared to other games (or at the least, how much in-depth they PLAN to make it, which is now legally binding since they stated it as fact instead of as something they HOPE to have in the sales page).
...so yea, "Dubious" (which means "uncertain", "suspect", "questionable", and "doubtful", for those who don't know) is definitely a good term for it.
Seems they just have put SC cause it's popular, not because it even compares to funding methods that fall on microtransactions such as SOTA's or even CoE. To talk about buying land and ignore the existence of Entropia Universe is just wtf.
Maybe perhaps, CR will start selling his blood, then we can talk.
What CR would sell would probably have more of a yellowish tinge.....
If you are holding out for the perfect game, the only game you play will be the waiting one.
Those ships aren't micro transactions and how any game can make these kinds of lists without being 'out.' Since we don't know the final product, save it, at least until it's closer to release.
Those ships aren't micro transactions and how any game can make these kinds of lists without being 'out.' Since we don't know the final product, save it, at least until it's closer to release.
As pointed out by Kyleran, the actual list was for the most DUBIOUS transactions (again, dubious means "uncertain" and "doubtful"), in which case, transactions for a game that isn't even out apply even MORE than a game that's out.
Was wondering when some more useless "concern" would finally come out of the woodwork after the Anniversary resounding success and 3.0 NDA lift lol...
News flash: most ambitious crowdfunding game ever has optional pre-sales of future content available to all backers instead of locking it behind future paid updates.
Was wondering when some more useless "concern" would finally come out of the woodwork after the Anniversary resounding success and 3.0 NDA lift lol...
News flash: most ambitious crowdfunding game ever has optional pre-sales of future content available to all backers instead of locking it behind future paid updates.
Someone call the Fed's. Quick.
I wouldnt call the sale a resounding success, there are reports the numbers have been faked actually. People can decide for themselves. But even the self proclaimed numbers arent that impressive. I said the minimum they should get should be 9 million (that was before the land sale nonsense), with one day to go theyre just over 8. They have put basically every jpeg they ever drew on sale along with a few new ones AND the land. Taking all that into consideration AND the ability for people to get their hands on 3.0 or in the very least see it for what it is that total is disappointing.
But you guys can spin it how you want I guess.
In the end EVERYTHING is for sale. Its the most ambitious telethon thats for sure. Whether it turns into anything actually playable remains to be seen.
Was wondering when some more useless "concern" would finally come out of the woodwork after the Anniversary resounding success and 3.0 NDA lift lol...
News flash: most ambitious crowdfunding game ever has optional pre-sales of future content available to all backers instead of locking it behind future paid updates.
Someone call the Fed's. Quick.
I wouldnt call the sale a resounding success, there are reports the numbers have been faked actually. People can decide for themselves. But even the self proclaimed numbers arent that impressive. I said the minimum they should get should be 9 million (that was before the land sale nonsense), with one day to go theyre just over 8. They have put basically every jpeg they ever drew on sale along with a few new ones AND the land. Taking all that into consideration AND the ability for people to get their hands on 3.0 or in the very least see it for what it is that total is disappointing.
But you guys can spin it how you want I guess.
In the end EVERYTHING is for sale. Its the most ambitious telethon thats for sure. Whether it turns into anything actually playable remains to be seen.
And we all know WHO is reporting that the numbers are fake, do we not? A totally unbiased reliable sane source.
Was wondering when some more useless "concern" would finally come out of the woodwork after the Anniversary resounding success and 3.0 NDA lift lol...
News flash: most ambitious crowdfunding game ever has optional pre-sales of future content available to all backers instead of locking it behind future paid updates.
Someone call the Fed's. Quick.
I wouldnt call the sale a resounding success, there are reports the numbers have been faked actually. People can decide for themselves. But even the self proclaimed numbers arent that impressive. I said the minimum they should get should be 9 million (that was before the land sale nonsense), with one day to go theyre just over 8. They have put basically every jpeg they ever drew on sale along with a few new ones AND the land. Taking all that into consideration AND the ability for people to get their hands on 3.0 or in the very least see it for what it is that total is disappointing.
But you guys can spin it how you want I guess.
In the end EVERYTHING is for sale. Its the most ambitious telethon thats for sure. Whether it turns into anything actually playable remains to be seen.
And we all know WHO is reporting that the numbers are fake, do we not? A totally unbiased reliable sane source.
Have fun
CIG? I agree they aren't unbiased, reliable or remotely sane, especially Christ Roberts
I have to agree with some things in the article. I played Dragons Age Origins and they did have a ton of never ending DLC.
They didn't include this but there was an uproar when Mass Effect locked having a Prothean in a DLC if you wanted to have him as a crew member, it didn't go over well.
They take a game, build it, then cut it up and sell the pieces for additional profit.
"We all do the best we can based on life experience, point of view, and our ability to believe in ourselves." - Naropa "We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are." SR Covey
Was wondering when some more useless "concern" would finally come out of the woodwork after the Anniversary resounding success and 3.0 NDA lift lol...
News flash: most ambitious crowdfunding game ever has optional pre-sales of future content available to all backers instead of locking it behind future paid updates.
Someone call the Fed's. Quick.
I wouldnt call the sale a resounding success, there are reports the numbers have been faked actually. People can decide for themselves. But even the self proclaimed numbers arent that impressive. I said the minimum they should get should be 9 million (that was before the land sale nonsense), with one day to go theyre just over 8. They have put basically every jpeg they ever drew on sale along with a few new ones AND the land. Taking all that into consideration AND the ability for people to get their hands on 3.0 or in the very least see it for what it is that total is disappointing.
But you guys can spin it how you want I guess.
In the end EVERYTHING is for sale. Its the most ambitious telethon thats for sure. Whether it turns into anything actually playable remains to be seen.
And we all know WHO is reporting that the numbers are fake, do we not? A totally unbiased reliable sane source.
Have fun
CIG? I agree they aren't unbiased, reliable or remotely sane, especially Christ Roberts
Go ahead and link the post where CIG is reporting that their numbers are fake.
Was wondering when some more useless "concern" would finally come out of the woodwork after the Anniversary resounding success and 3.0 NDA lift lol...
News flash: most ambitious crowdfunding game ever has optional pre-sales of future content available to all backers instead of locking it behind future paid updates.
Someone call the Fed's. Quick.
I wouldnt call the sale a resounding success, there are reports the numbers have been faked actually. People can decide for themselves. But even the self proclaimed numbers arent that impressive. I said the minimum they should get should be 9 million (that was before the land sale nonsense), with one day to go theyre just over 8. They have put basically every jpeg they ever drew on sale along with a few new ones AND the land. Taking all that into consideration AND the ability for people to get their hands on 3.0 or in the very least see it for what it is that total is disappointing.
But you guys can spin it how you want I guess.
In the end EVERYTHING is for sale. Its the most ambitious telethon thats for sure. Whether it turns into anything actually playable remains to be seen.
And we all know WHO is reporting that the numbers are fake, do we not? A totally unbiased reliable sane source.
Have fun
CIG? I agree they aren't unbiased, reliable or remotely sane, especially Christ Roberts
Go ahead and link the post where CIG is reporting that their numbers are fake.
We believe in you!!
Have fun
I didn't mention anything about them reporting about fake numbers. You take shit far too seriously and need to relax a bit
Comments
the look on there face when its all made illegal .....PRICE LESS
Have fun
They kicked him off eBay for trying to auction his blood so he sold it on his own website, 10 vials of blood, 5 were his and 5 belonged to his producer.
I understand that the games need funding too be made but both the games moved into the realm of pure comedy.
I don't think it will be illegal, at least if they put it right. Getting bonuses for funding an upcomming game is not the same thing as selling random lootboxes, there is no gambling involved.
That said, rewarding too good stuff for funding a game is dangerous if they want to have more customers then just the ones funding it (then again, they are making the game for those people).
I think if some legal action will be taken against cashshop items or lootboxes a lot will depend on the wording. Offering a super pay2win ship as a reward for people that pledge a certain amount of cash is almost impossible to forbid but selling loose items is far easier.
What do people want with the hair BTW? Clone their own Lord British?
The argumentation of "selling stuff before it even exists" for SC (in the funding kickstart nature of it) yet give a free pass to season passes? hmmm
Maybe perhaps, CR will start selling his blood, then we can talk.
Loot boxes based on RNG are what was being investigated and potentially made illegal in Belgium.
That's because RNG loot boxes where real money is involved is gambling which is a strictly regulated industry and illegal without the proper permission.
In Star Citizen you get exactly what you pay for so, it's your own dumb fault if you paid $1000 for some digital ship that the rest of us will obtain, by playing in game, with relative ease in all likelihood.
Reporter: What's behind Blizzard success, and how do you make your gamers happy?
Blizzard Boss: Making gamers happy is not my concern, making money.. yes!
End of the day this project that might someday be a game ISNT that popular despite all the numbers of 'citizens' you want to cite. The money they have made is basically 99% micro transaction. Although I think they could call some of them macro since the prices are so ridiculous. So they could more than likely rename the list itself the 'Star Citizen award for most aggregious micro transaction pay to win concept ever thought of'.
As for the guy saying you get what you pay for...ummmm no you dont I dont think half the Jpegs they have sold have been pixelated into ships in the game yet. So its a gamble just hoping they someday get around to it.
I am sure someone has the list but I would like to know the 'oldest' jpeg they have sold that hasnt yet been made. Is it 2 years? 3 years? One of the first ones?
Either way Star Citizen epitomizes predatory selling.
"True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde
"I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant
Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm
Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV
Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™
"This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon
Of course, there's a lot of open ended things up in the air for ships too (exactly how good will they be and perform are unanswerable questions when the game's still mostly just concept for example). Land just has way more than that, especially with how complex and in-depth Star Citizen is making its housing and land system compared to other games (or at the least, how much in-depth they PLAN to make it, which is now legally binding since they stated it as fact instead of as something they HOPE to have in the sales page).
...so yea, "Dubious" (which means "uncertain", "suspect", "questionable", and "doubtful", for those who don't know) is definitely a good term for it.
If you are holding out for the perfect game, the only game you play will be the waiting one.
I self identify as a monkey.
News flash: most ambitious crowdfunding game ever has optional pre-sales of future content available to all backers instead of locking it behind future paid updates.
Someone call the Fed's. Quick.
It's that bad now huh?
"classification of games into MMOs is not by rational reasoning" - nariusseldon
Love Minecraft. And check out my Youtube channel OhCanadaGamer
Try a MUD today at http://www.mudconnect.com/But you guys can spin it how you want I guess.
In the end EVERYTHING is for sale. Its the most ambitious telethon thats for sure. Whether it turns into anything actually playable remains to be seen.
I dunno how they can manage tbh lol
Have fun
They didn't include this but there was an uproar when Mass Effect locked having a Prothean in a DLC if you wanted to have him as a crew member, it didn't go over well.
They take a game, build it, then cut it up and sell the pieces for additional profit.
"We all do the best we can based on life experience, point of view, and our ability to believe in ourselves." - Naropa "We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are." SR Covey
We believe in you!!
Have fun