It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
It's always interesting to read the thoughts of an industry insider (and a veteran one at that).
But as most gamers can tell, many developers do not agree with a lot of Dave's views, specifically in area's such as communication. There is no universal handbook on how to run your game development company that everyone follows.
Fortunately (or unfortunately?), this difference in development companies is what separates failures from success stories.
Chi puo dir com'egli arde é in picciol fuoco.He who can describe the flame does not burn.Petrarch
Originally posted by axefury This was an excellent article.
This +1 !!! Nailed it on the point.
Thanks a Ton for that.
Aerowyn's Video Compilation of ALL things Guild Wars 2
Originally posted by Neanderthal
I'd just like to point out a couple of things which jumped out at me from that article. The first is where he said: "Gamers will always want new challenges and new experiences. Thus, devs are always required to plunge into untried R&D territory to make it happen." And yet, the most common complaint we see on these forums is that developers have been rehashing the same ol' thing over and over again for years. You've all seen multitudes of post bitching about how all mmo's for years have just been the same game reskinned. Maybe the graphics have improved. Certainly the map layout is different. But basically it's just the same crap over and over again. So my question is; where the hell is all this "new" stuff which devs have always been required to plunge into? Are they hiding it under a rock somewhere? The second thing which jumped out at me was where he said, "Don't screw up your core gameplay". A statement which seems a bit ironic to me considering that he worked for SOE.
I'd just like to point out a couple of things which jumped out at me from that article.
The first is where he said:
"Gamers will always want new challenges and new experiences. Thus, devs are always required to plunge into untried R&D territory to make it happen."
And yet, the most common complaint we see on these forums is that developers have been rehashing the same ol' thing over and over again for years. You've all seen multitudes of post bitching about how all mmo's for years have just been the same game reskinned. Maybe the graphics have improved. Certainly the map layout is different. But basically it's just the same crap over and over again. So my question is; where the hell is all this "new" stuff which devs have always been required to plunge into? Are they hiding it under a rock somewhere?
The second thing which jumped out at me was where he said, "Don't screw up your core gameplay". A statement which seems a bit ironic to me considering that he worked for SOE.
His comments and "the reality" aren't mutually exclusive.
Maybe the developers knew that they needed to plunge into untried R&D territory but weren't allowed to do it so had to find some sort of happy medium that hopefully worked?
And maybe the years as SOE drove home that screwing up core game play would cost you but it was a balancing act to get good core game play.
Reminds me of the time I mentioned that I beta tested Masters of Orion III on some forum. It was released in a horrible state.
Someone commented that I and other other beta testers obviously didn't do our job. But we did, we just had no power to actually make changes.
Who knows what battles go on in AAA development studios where they want to be cutting edge (as per the article) but their overlords don't want to bring the studio down (which is reasonable).
-------------------------"Searchers after horror haunt strange, far places..." ~ H.P.Lovecraft, "From Beyond"
Member Since March 2004
Originally posted by Tracho12
Because it bears worth repeating... Either Smokejumper is legit or he's the best snake-oil salesman this world has ever seen. Either way, someone get this man a job.
I've always thought that that, if Dave wasn't a snake-oil salesman in a former life, it was because the universe miss-handled his reincarnation.
I didn't always agree with his direction and ideas, but I always admired his ability to put a positive spin on things.
Logic, my dear, merely enables one to be wrong with great authority.
It´s all nice and sexy, but I would want to know (if possible? - maybe Dave is not in position to speak openly about these) more details about some unpleasant EQN topics such as rumored budget cuts (back in Sony days) and it´s consequences for original EQN vision, eventual internal (and possibly broken?) deadlines, his opinion about layoffs and ESPECIALLY his opinion on where is EQN going to end?
Otherwise this will turn into pleasant but somewhat abstract chit-chat.
One of the best articles I have ever read on this site! I doubt anyone has to worry what will happen with Dave because no doubt he will land on his feet.
Just let us know here first what your new project will be.
I have 2 things to say :
1. Last week, EQN did not just have great losses. EQN lost greats.
2. What's Next for Dave Georgeson (no pun intended)?
Still cant believe they fired you man
TSW - AoC - Aion - WOW - EVE - Fallen Earth - Co - Rift - || XNA C# Java Development
I took a few things away from this article.
one was where he talked about talent a b c grade etc.. I asked myself did soe have the talent for eq2 to take on warcraft.. well, i got to play both at launch and i chose eq2 and was a sub until the end of the kunark expansion.. eq2 was awesome to that stage.. so yes, to start with, they had the talent.
but like big convenience stores going out of business because they do not sell online, so did eq2 fail to change with the modern times. there were no dungeon finders, raid finders, meaningful pvp, even the basics such as multicore cpu support. i recently returned to eq2 and found the game a former shell of itself... characters so OP they could solo 4x raids.. levelling so fast you could do it in a weekend.. graphics so dated I would have been ashamed to show it to friends, a dungeon finder system limited to a handful of the dozens of dungeons available... the entire essence of the game has been lost.. its such a shame because the original experience was so different and so good. in contrast, you look at what GW2 has done and it plays great, looks amazing and even newbie zones are populated with new and old. its but an example of a modern implementation that works. the 202 million $ in sales for gw2 confirms it. and then in the works we have landmark... which not only looks worse, plays worse and feels subpar compared to gw2, i only but wonder how the guys at soe think their game is going to make it big?? no bloody way, hozay.
i look at landmark and i cant help but think how great something like that would have been for housing in ultima online...and in reality thats all it is.. a housing system. needed? YES, but to this extent? no.. not at launch anyway. the focus is completely off EQN and all about this incredible crafting tool that seems all a bit overkill. from a player perspective, the feeling is 2 fold. on one side, its just incredible to to have tools like this in a game, but on the flipside, it seems to come at the cost of just about everything else. years and years into dev for eqn, we have no zones, we have no list of chars, we dont have incredible graphics, we have pretty damn weak combat systems.. basically we have a game that just wont stand up to the competition.
SOOOOOO with that whitewizzardwalloftext, DaveG, that was meant for you. My feeling is that under your lead things did not go the right direction. I feel your ambitions may have been too great for the team you had to work with, which is why I feel you opened this article with quality teams in different circumstances. I feel for you, because should you had the talent at Arena net and the workforce at Blizzard with the brains of SOE at your disposal, I think we would have had a hell of a game.
I did not play EQ1, but I would thank you for the many years I spent in EQ2. I loved so many things about it and is one of two games (UO) that I've spent many years of my life in. Well done, and can't wait to see what you do down the road.
Well, I can see why this guy was tapped for his position. His outward face is great. Really nicely written article. Even though none of his games were ones that I played, the descriptions of the nuts and bolts stuff was quite interesting.
Since this is a public forum, we'll probably never get the 'who screwed up, what really went down' story. But this walk through the mechanics of construction and the ebb and flow of design was well worth it.
If you are holding out for the perfect game, the only game you play will be the waiting one.
Even if I'm not a big fan of the games you were over, your passion reminds me why I love this genre.
Hope you land on your feet.
By far the most articulate and intelligent article this site has seen in years, truly an enjoyable and enlightening read.
Thanks for everything Dave, looking forward to seeing you working on new projects in the future. Hope everything is well with you and the family. Take care sir.