Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Wildstar - will have endgame for the solo player

NadiaNadia Member UncommonPosts: 11,798

interview from 3 days ago

 

WildStar and the Search for a Better Endgame

WildStar's executive producer hints at an endgame that's just as fun for solo players.

http://pc.gamespy.com/pc/wildstar/1227411p1.html

His solution is to implement a series of single-player dungeons, similar in concept to Rift's Chronicles or Lord of the Rings Online's Skirmishes. The details are still sketchy at this point, but Gaffney at least related that many of these single-player dungeons will be tied to one of WildStar's signature "Paths," which let players focus on an element of the game they enjoy the most. If you choose Explorer, for instance, many of your missions and solo dungeons will center on climbing peaks and surveying terrain, occasionally exploring underground passageways that only you can access. "Paths also unlock a different set of dailies," he said, "or, at least, that's our intent."

«1

Comments

  • YamotaYamota Member UncommonPosts: 6,593
    Although it is good that they are providing some end game content for the solo player, I hope the bulk of the end-game content will be for groups of people. Otherwise what would be the point in playing an MMO?
  • RoxtarrRoxtarr Member CommonPosts: 1,122
    When solo and raiders both think the game is for them, it could get a bit dangerous since the old saying is "jack of all trades and master of none".  The game is still in marketing and attention mode, so only time will tell which group it's REALLY set up for.

    If in 1982 we played with the current mentality, we would have burned down all the pac man games since the red ghost was clearly OP. Instead we just got better at the game.
    image

  • CromicaCromica Member UncommonPosts: 657
    Originally posted by Yamota
    Although it is good that they are providing some end game content for the solo player, I hope the bulk of the end-game content will be for groups of people. Otherwise what would be the point in playing an MMO?

    They are having 40man raids. If thats not enough groups for people I don't know what is.

  • mikunimanmikuniman Member UncommonPosts: 375
    Having content for all types of gameplay is just good marketing.
  • achesomaachesoma Member RarePosts: 1,726
    Originally posted by Yamota
    Although it is good that they are providing some end game content for the solo player, I hope the bulk of the end-game content will be for groups of people. Otherwise what would be the point in playing an MMO?

    You don't have to worry about that.  They are planning to have a years worth of "elder game" content by release.   Carbine's goal is to have a buffet of content for all play types.  Everything from solo to 40 man raids to small groups. 

    Preaching Pantheon to People at PAX  PAX East 2018 Day 4 - YouTube
  • ShakyMoShakyMo Member CommonPosts: 7,207
    I've a strong feeling the raiders will be the priority though, this game screams "wow in space" at you with the voice of Brian Blessed.

    I'm not expecting much for pvpers or crafters at all.
  • rodingorodingo Member RarePosts: 2,870
    I think that's a good thing.  There is nothing worse than alienating a portion of your playerbase (now matter how big or small) from parts of your game.  Sure some people like to play MMOs to meet  new "friends", however there is probably an equal, if not bigger portion of players that play MMOs becuase of the bigger, living world and economy. 

    "If I offended you, you needed it" -Corey Taylor

  • udonudon Member UncommonPosts: 1,803

    At the end of the day they can add all the solo content they want but if the rewards are not meaninful no one will play it.  The problem with "meaninful" is that if you make it even close to what raiders can get at the hard end of solo content than many start to scream that your trivalizing raid content.  For most raiders it's more about having far away the best gear in the game than any sort of feeling of accomplishment around being able to pull together the teamwork required to kill that raid mob.

    Solo content sounds good but it can not exist in a meaninful manner next to raid content long term.  EQ2 has dabbled with it from time to time and always ended up abandoning it because they had to nerf the gear so far to keep raiders happy that no one cared about it anymore and if no one is going to do the content there isn't much of a point in developing more of it.

  • mikahrmikahr Member Posts: 1,066
    Originally posted by udon

    At the end of the day they can add all the solo content they want but if the rewards are not meaninful no one will play it.  The problem with "meaninful" is that if you make it even close to what raiders can get at the hard end of solo content than many start to scream that your trivalizing raid content.  For most raiders it's more about having far away the best gear in the game than any sort of feeling of accomplishment around being able to pull together the teamwork required to kill that raid mob.

    Solo content sounds good but it can not exist in a meaninful manner next to raid content long term.  EQ2 has dabbled with it from time to time and always ended up abandoning it because they had to nerf the gear so far to keep raiders happy that no one cared about it anymore and if no one is going to do the content there isn't much of a point in developing more of it.

    EQ2 was a fail game fom the starts so i wouldnt use it for any example except for "How not to make a game"

    If "radiers" are not enjoying what they are doing then they shouldnt do it. Uber rewards only screw up whole game, even the latest raid by making it easier with every piece.

    Solo needs better and much more content than your average MMO fare AND meaninful rewards, there are 60+% soloers after all, who do you think quits genric MMOs when they reach endgame?

    And no, dailes are not "solo gamers endgame" they are "catch up" mechanism for raiders.

  • CelciusCelcius Member RarePosts: 1,868
    Really? They mention daily quests and the game is not even out yet? Between this and 40 man raiding I think they are going off the deep end. I mean, the game looks cool. I like the graphic style and cartoony/fun/comedic nature of the game. I just think they are making huge mistakes with some of their designs. Maybe if the game is B2P then it can be good competition for other themeparks I guess.
  • NadiaNadia Member UncommonPosts: 11,798

    I hate daily quests in any mmo w a passion

    I'm waiting to hear more details about the nonraider endgame

  • Rthuth434Rthuth434 Member Posts: 346

    [mod edit]

     

    WildStar has no single player endgame. 

     

    just confirmed today AGAIN its dungeons are set in stone 5 players, raids are 20 and 40 man. there are no singelplayer dungeons.

  • NadiaNadia Member UncommonPosts: 11,798
    Originally posted by Rthuth434

    [mod edit]

    its not wishful thinking when they are statements made by the game studio

     

    the gamespy interview in the 1st post was with Jeremy Gaffney, executive producer

     

    in addition, mmorpg.com gave a preview at Gamescom 2012

     single player progression is supposedly rewarding

    http://www.mmorpg.com/gamelist.cfm?game=632&feature=6656&WildStar-Ensuring-That-the-Journey-is-Fun.html

    The sheer level of content we can expect is kind of staggering but what is really impressive is the fact that there will be more than a few people dedicated to the task of churning out single-player content to ensure the non-PvPer and the non-Raider have something to do

     

     

    as I've stated before

    I'm awaiting more details of the nonraider endgame

  • VorthanionVorthanion Member RarePosts: 2,749
    With today's technology, why aren't they building scalable dungeons, raids, quests, general content?  Not just for soloers.  There are also huge numbers of gamers who play in small groups of two or three.  Where's the content for them?  Scalability is the answer and the technology is there to make it happen.  So, what's keeping these people from embracing this technology in every MMO?

    image
  • udonudon Member UncommonPosts: 1,803
    Originally posted by Vorthanion
    With today's technology, why aren't they building scalable dungeons, raids, quests, general content?  Not just for soloers.  There are also huge numbers of gamers who play in small groups of two or three.  Where's the content for them?  Scalability is the answer and the technology is there to make it happen.  So, what's keeping these people from embracing this technology in every MMO?

    It's not a question of tech it's all about player ego's and developer control over loot tables.  If solo and small group content was rewarding raiders would scream that it makes what they do meaninless.  I have seen it play out time and time again in MMO's.

    I raid in EQ2 and I do enjoy it for the most part but you know it's stupid how much of a difference in power there is between a solo/small group player and a raider in that game.  Same for WoW, Rift, and every other MMO that has raiding as the top of the PVE end game content. 

    I believe that raiding should reward you in ways other than more powerful gear.  I know that gear is the easiest to implement but it's posion to a PVE game long term.  When raiding rewards become the most powerful rewards than nothing else you do in game once you hit level cap matters.

  • MardukkMardukk Member RarePosts: 2,222
    Good. For some reason solo challenge has been sorely lacking since the old school games.
  • SagornSagorn Member UncommonPosts: 25

    I am also very interested in a game that has end game solo content. Just because I like MMO's doesn't mean I want to deal with the egos and hassles of being in a raiding guild. Been there.. done that ... ruined games for me.

    I also understand the issue that raid gear HAS to be the BEST or the raiders whine.. and whine.. and whine. I still think EQ had the best feature in any MMO... the AA system.  Now, I did play my own 6-man group so it made it easy for me to get AA's for my characters, but for the purpose of this conversation, let's assume that any solo friendly game can do the same thing. In EQ I was able to make my characters stronger by playing more and gaining AA (alternate abilities for those who never played the game). While I *was* in a raiding guild at the time, it still gave me the opportunity to have a much stronger character than many of my fellow raiders because all they had was raid gear.. and very few AA's.

    My biggest complaint with every single solo "friendly" MMO I have played (which is pretty much everything) is that at max level, unless you want to rad, you're done. Sure, you can farm cloth, or herbs, or ore etc.. or grind dailies for some *ok* gear, but unless you raid, you are basically never going to be as strong as any 10 year old punk who raids a few hours a week. I normally play 10-16 hours a day (yes.. I am financially fortunate) and it really doesn't seem right that I am not rewarded for my game time by being able to make my character stronger/better somehow other than a gear grind that forces me to raid. It still doesn't make sense to me that a company hasn't realized how easy it would be to implement an EQ AA like system for their game, and make all those solo players feel like they have something to do at max level to make their characters better, without having to to raid. The raiders can't complain, because the best gear is still there, and if they want to put in the time to grind out AA's, they are welcome to do that to. I guess what it boils down to is, if I put in the time, why do I not get the rewards?, which in this case, means a stronger character.

    Of course I would also like to see a really robust crafting system for end game items as well, but that is also part of my dream MMO. And I don't mean crafting gear with a crafter that takes you 2 hours to max out. I mean a game where crafting IS the game for the crafter. Taking months to max out, and farming/creating rare mats to make the *best* gear. But I digress....

    -Sagorn

  • VorthanionVorthanion Member RarePosts: 2,749
    Originally posted by udon
    Originally posted by Vorthanion
    With today's technology, why aren't they building scalable dungeons, raids, quests, general content?  Not just for soloers.  There are also huge numbers of gamers who play in small groups of two or three.  Where's the content for them?  Scalability is the answer and the technology is there to make it happen.  So, what's keeping these people from embracing this technology in every MMO?

    It's not a question of tech it's all about player ego's and developer control over loot tables.  If solo and small group content was rewarding raiders would scream that it makes what they do meaninless.  I have seen it play out time and time again in MMO's.

    I raid in EQ2 and I do enjoy it for the most part but you know it's stupid how much of a difference in power there is between a solo/small group player and a raider in that game.  Same for WoW, Rift, and every other MMO that has raiding as the top of the PVE end game content. 

    I believe that raiding should reward you in ways other than more powerful gear.  I know that gear is the easiest to implement but it's posion to a PVE game long term.  When raiding rewards become the most powerful rewards than nothing else you do in game once you hit level cap matters.

    I've known about the loot caste system the genre embraces for a very long time, I just didn't want to bring it up as I always get slandered for even thinking it, let alone bringing it to light.  Still, you have to wonder why companies don't embrace technologies that make designing content easier and more accessible to a wider audience, even if they stick with crappy rewards for everyone but raiders.

    image
  • droopydroopy Member Posts: 15

    Well the best MMORPG or atleast the one i had most fun with was WoW, before they ruined it that is. So i'd be more than happy if Wildstar can emulate that Vanilla/BC feeling, it do feel like they try to capture some of  that, not straight up copying WoW but expanding on the stuff players loved and adding cool new features of their own.

    World PvP is hinted, and that's probably the #1 thing i'm hyped about. Will I finnaly be able to roam around the entire world on foot or ground mount again? instead of this horrible large instances newer MMO's today call World PvP, or bullshit flying mounts. Allso the world will be seamless like WoW that's a big plus!.

     

  • WightyWighty Member UncommonPosts: 699

    The forced raid/group mentality only fosters elitism crap...

     

    "You can't be in my guild because you can't commit to 5 nights and 40 hours a week to do nothing but Raid"

    "You can't be in my group because all you have is scrub quested gear"

    "What's your gearscore"

     

    I actually prefer to play solo because I don't have the patience to deal with most players in game anyhow...

    What are your other Hobbies?

    Gaming is Dirt Cheap compared to this...

  • FoxyShoxzyFoxyShoxzy Member UncommonPosts: 120
    Originally posted by Vorthanion
    With today's technology, why aren't they building scalable dungeons, raids, quests, general content?  Not just for soloers.  There are also huge numbers of gamers who play in small groups of two or three.  Where's the content for them?  Scalability is the answer and the technology is there to make it happen.  So, what's keeping these people from embracing this technology in every MMO?

     

    This is a very good question and something I have wondered about as well.

  • tintilinictintilinic Member Posts: 283
    Originally posted by FoxyShoxzy
    Originally posted by Vorthanion
    With today's technology, why aren't they building scalable dungeons, raids, quests, general content?  Not just for soloers.  There are also huge numbers of gamers who play in small groups of two or three.  Where's the content for them?  Scalability is the answer and the technology is there to make it happen.  So, what's keeping these people from embracing this technology in every MMO?

     

    This is a very good question and something I have wondered about as well.

    Its very much entitlement thing. Certain caste of players think that everything in MMO should cater to them and this would cheapen "value" of content.

    Personally i think its waste of resources because you waste by building something for only 1 person or for only 40 people when you can build everything scalable for 1-40 and have much better perception of amount of content.

    *shrug*

  • NadiaNadia Member UncommonPosts: 11,798

    looking forward to hearing more :)

    http://us.ncsoft.com/en/events/pax-east-2013/

    On Friday, March 22, Journey to Nexus at the WildStar panel—happening in the Phoenix Theater at 3:00 PM. Join Carbine Studios developers as they detail what makes WildStar different from any other MMO.

  • Alber_gamerAlber_gamer Member UncommonPosts: 588
    And so the SMMO was born (Solo Massive Multiplayer Online).

    My opinion is my own. I respect all other opinions and views equally, but keep in mind that my opinion will always be the best for me. That's why it's my opinion.

  • MargulisMargulis Member CommonPosts: 1,614
    Originally posted by Alber_gamer
    And so the SMMO was born (Solo Massive Multiplayer Online).

    Sounds awesome sign me up!

Sign In or Register to comment.