Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Is there any way to hide the disgusting anime-soft-porn pictures on MMORPG.com?

123457

Comments

  • ScorchienScorchien Member LegendaryPosts: 7,879
    Ungood said:
    Drawing a Cartoon that looks young and sexy does not make you Pedo.

    Wanting to have sex with young children is what makes you a Pedo.

    If you look at a cartoon and get sexual urges, that is called Fictosexual.

    Just wanted to help people use the right terms, and I am suddenly wondering if calling people "Ficto" sounds as dirty and I am imagining it to sound. 

    Thanks!



    What if i get urges looking at Raviollis and Meatballs?
    maskedweaselSandmanjwUngoodCryomatrixKylerantzervoMustikos
  • maskedweaselmaskedweasel Member EpicPosts: 10,966
    Scorchien said:
    Ungood said:
    Drawing a Cartoon that looks young and sexy does not make you Pedo.

    Wanting to have sex with young children is what makes you a Pedo.

    If you look at a cartoon and get sexual urges, that is called Fictosexual.

    Just wanted to help people use the right terms, and I am suddenly wondering if calling people "Ficto" sounds as dirty and I am imagining it to sound. 

    Thanks!



    What if i get urges looking at Raviollis and Meatballs?
    I think that's called just being a normal dude. Cause everyone has those urges, right? RIIIIGHT?!
    ScorchienWargfootSandmanjwUngoodKylerantzervoMustikos



  • MensurMensur Member RarePosts: 1,004
    edited June 5
    I am all for for big tits and chicks with Dicks.. but this Anime soft porn makes my wife always angry. 
    ScorchienKyleranMustikos

    Proud MMORPG.com member since 2009! 




  • WargfootWargfoot Member RarePosts: 508
    Scorchien said:
    Ungood said:
    Drawing a Cartoon that looks young and sexy does not make you Pedo.

    Wanting to have sex with young children is what makes you a Pedo.

    If you look at a cartoon and get sexual urges, that is called Fictosexual.

    Just wanted to help people use the right terms, and I am suddenly wondering if calling people "Ficto" sounds as dirty and I am imagining it to sound. 

    Thanks!



    What if i get urges looking at Raviollis and Meatballs?
    Reported to the Italian Restaurateurs Association.



    UngoodKyleranTuor7
  • WargfootWargfoot Member RarePosts: 508
    Ungood said:
    Drawing a Cartoon that looks young and sexy does not make you Pedo.

    Wanting to have sex with young children is what makes you a Pedo.

    If you look at a cartoon and get sexual urges, that is called Fictosexual.

    Just wanted to help people use the right terms, and I am suddenly wondering if calling people "Ficto" sounds as dirty and I am imagining it to sound. 

    Thanks!


    You seem to know a lot about this stuff for a guy who just got here.
  • ScorchienScorchien Member LegendaryPosts: 7,879
    edited June 5
    Mensur said:
    I am all for for big tits and chicks with Dicks.. but this Anime soft porn makes my wife always angry. 

    not that there is anything wrong with that :)
    Post edited by Scorchien on
    Mensur
  • UngoodUngood Member LegendaryPosts: 5,815
    Wargfoot said:
    Ungood said:
    Drawing a Cartoon that looks young and sexy does not make you Pedo.

    Wanting to have sex with young children is what makes you a Pedo.

    If you look at a cartoon and get sexual urges, that is called Fictosexual.

    Just wanted to help people use the right terms, and I am suddenly wondering if calling people "Ficto" sounds as dirty and I am imagining it to sound. 

    Thanks!


    You seem to know a lot about this stuff for a guy who just got here.
    I am offended.

    I'll have you know I have been a raging know-it-all asshat on these forums for years! 
    maskedweaselScorchienWargfootKylerantzervoScot
    Egotism is the anesthetic that dullens the pain of stupidity, this is why when I try to beat my head against the stupidity of other people, I only hurt myself.
  • KnightFalzKnightFalz Member EpicPosts: 1,867
    Wargfoot said:
    Wargfoot said:
    kitarad said:
    Wargfoot said:
    kitarad said:
    Child porn??? Where in hell did that come from. You know the real problem is with the people who look at anime and connect children to it.

    The Wiki for the game puts the age of some of the girls at under 18.
    I didn't connect it to children, the developer did.

    I'll put you down for "Okay with the sexual exploitation of children in video games."
    I grew up even since I was a little girl watching anime. Calling me for the sexual exploitation of children is what is wrong with you. You are the sicko here seeing children in anime.
    Nobody here is attacking anime or children in anime.
    You're free to join the actual conversation at any time.

    Other than consistently, throughout this conversation, in actuality.
    Same offer I made another poster.
    Feel free to join the actual conversation at any time.

    You've been confusing anime with child porn since you began participating in this thread, so don't pretend you haven't made that part of the conversation.
    WargfootUngoodTuor7
  • WargfootWargfoot Member RarePosts: 508
    edited June 6
    You've been confusing anime with child porn since you began participating in this thread, so don't pretend you haven't made that part of the conversation.
    Please stay on topic: We've moved on to Ungood being a know-it-all asshat.

    KyleranUngood
  • KnightFalzKnightFalz Member EpicPosts: 1,867
    Wargfoot said:
    You've been confusing anime with child porn since you began participating in this thread, so don't pretend you haven't made that part of the conversation.
    Please stay on topic: We've moved on to Ungood being a know-it-all asshat.


    Oh, I see. I did miss that shift.
  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 37,894
    Wargfoot said:
    You've been confusing anime with child porn since you began participating in this thread, so don't pretend you haven't made that part of the conversation.
    Please stay on topic: We've moved on to Ungood being a know-it-all asshat.


    Oh, I see. I did miss that shift.
    Well yeah, but who here isn't?
    Ungood

    "See normal people, I'm not one of them" | G-Easy & Big Sean

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing FO76 at the moment.

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding, but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • olepiolepi Member RarePosts: 1,604
    Just rename it to Sex Worker and be done with it.

    :wink:
    WargfootMustikos

    ------------
    2021: 44 years on the Net.


  • AmarantharAmaranthar Member EpicPosts: 4,421
    Judging from the defenders here of little girls faces on voluptuous women's bodies in the never ending sex-sells marketing ploys, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that it has worked. 
    Mustikos

    Once upon a time....

  • KnightFalzKnightFalz Member EpicPosts: 1,867
    Judging from the defenders here of little girls faces on voluptuous women's bodies in the never ending sex-sells marketing ploys, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that it has worked. 

    Sex sells, as always.

    One would think the voluptuous bodies would be enough to signify they weren't little girls, but apparently some here know enough well endowed female children so as to create this degree of confusion.

    Or, they know it's BS and continue on regardless in the hope they can cause such confusion in others for some reason, which seems a tad more likely.

    Either way, there is nothing "little girl" about these images.
    UngoodMustikos
  • kitaradkitarad Member LegendaryPosts: 6,568
    edited June 7
    There are many creatures in fantasy and art that look young but are ancient. The associations we make in our heads to real life people isn't real. Those characters don't exist outside of the artist's imagination.

    In Japanese manga and anime schoolgirls in the stories wear incredibly short skirts. The school is a setting for many stories. When an interviewer interviewed some schoolgirls and asked if they did that in school. Their answer was that schools have regulations and they cannot wear skirts like that in school. They do however fold the waist to make the skirt shorter outside of school, it is not influenced by manga or anime but a pop star from the 90's called Namie Amuro.

    When you grow up watching these anime and reading manga, manhwa(Korean) you make a clear distinction between art style and story from real life. Exposure to them makes a difference and also an understanding of cultural differences. Which in some of the posters' view is to excuse grown men fantasizing about little girls in grown women's bodies. Bear in mind they don't exist. What you are imagining is in your head.

    This idea that what is shown and written refers to real life girls is absurd. Like I said before they are not human beings. They are pure art.

    This game that you're complaining about is playable by kids in real life?  Is it open to all ages?
    UngoodMustikosTuor7cheyane

  • HidesBehindShadowHidesBehindShadow Newbie CommonPosts: 25
    I think the person who started this thread has the problem. If you look at these images and feel to make a thread about the images being soft porn then perhaps the op is hiding something.




    UngoodMustikosTuor7
  • ScotScot Member LegendaryPosts: 15,274
    I think the person who started this thread has the problem. If you look at these images and feel to make a thread about the images being soft porn then perhaps the op is hiding something.
    I have no issues with the ads but this is just mud throwing. We cannot read people's minds at all, though social media and indeed all news media seem to suggest we can.
    UngoodMustikosTuor7
  • UngoodUngood Member LegendaryPosts: 5,815
    edited June 7
    Judging from the defenders here of little girls faces on voluptuous women's bodies in the never ending sex-sells marketing ploys, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that it has worked. 

    Sex sells, as always.

    One would think the voluptuous bodies would be enough to signify they weren't little girls, but apparently some here know enough well endowed female children so as to create this degree of confusion.

    Or, they know it's BS and continue on regardless in the hope they can cause such confusion in others for some reason, which seems a tad more likely.

    Either way, there is nothing "little girl" about these images.
    Well I checked their steam charts, and, I have to admit, you're right, it seems putting up that Soft Core Porn ads on gaming sights worked. They near to doubled tripled their numbers.
    Egotism is the anesthetic that dullens the pain of stupidity, this is why when I try to beat my head against the stupidity of other people, I only hurt myself.
  • WargfootWargfoot Member RarePosts: 508
    I think the person who started this thread has the problem. If you look at these images and feel to make a thread about the images being soft porn then perhaps the op is hiding something.




    This is the dumbest thing I've read on Al Gore's internet.
    Mustikoscameltosis
  • kitaradkitarad Member LegendaryPosts: 6,568
    Scot said:
    I think the person who started this thread has the problem. If you look at these images and feel to make a thread about the images being soft porn then perhaps the op is hiding something.
    I have no issues with the ads but this is just mud throwing. We cannot read people's minds at all, though social media and indeed all news media seem to suggest we can.
    Ahh but it is okay with you that someone said I am okay with sexual exploitation of children in video games because I didn't see children in the art.

    Even if the creator of the game said they were 2 year olds and children it does not make what is happening in the game sexual exploitation of children. You can take it up with the authorities. 

    Everything that you're imagining is on you and don't assume that everyone looking at the images are interpreting them the same you do. This is what happens when people try to push their morality and ideas on others based on fictional drawings and games.
    MustikosTuor7cheyane

  • WargfootWargfoot Member RarePosts: 508
    kitarad said:

    This idea that what is shown and written refers to real life girls is absurd. Like I said before they are not human beings. They are pure art.
    Again, at any point you'd like to join the actual conversation...


    Tuor7
  • kitaradkitarad Member LegendaryPosts: 6,568
    Wargfoot said:
    kitarad said:

    This idea that what is shown and written refers to real life girls is absurd. Like I said before they are not human beings. They are pure art.
    Again, at any point you'd like to join the actual conversation...


    I already addressed it.



    Even if the creator of the game said they were 2 year olds and children it does not make what is happening in the game sexual exploitation of children. You can take it up with the authorities. 

    Tuor7cheyane

  • WargfootWargfoot Member RarePosts: 508
    kitarad said:
    Wargfoot said:
    kitarad said:

    This idea that what is shown and written refers to real life girls is absurd. Like I said before they are not human beings. They are pure art.
    Again, at any point you'd like to join the actual conversation...


    I already addressed it.



    Even if the creator of the game said they were 2 year olds and children it does not make what is happening in the game sexual exploitation of children. You can take it up with the authorities. 

    I've not equated animated pornographic images with the sexual exploitation of children.

    You seem to be backing yourself up into a weird position that if something is animated it cannot possibly be offensive or inappropriate. 

    I'm done with you until you can actually contribute.



    Tuor7
  • kitaradkitarad Member LegendaryPosts: 6,568
    Wargfoot said:
    kitarad said:
    Wargfoot said:
    kitarad said:

    This idea that what is shown and written refers to real life girls is absurd. Like I said before they are not human beings. They are pure art.
    Again, at any point you'd like to join the actual conversation...


    I already addressed it.



    Even if the creator of the game said they were 2 year olds and children it does not make what is happening in the game sexual exploitation of children. You can take it up with the authorities. 

    I've not equated animated pornographic images with the sexual exploitation of children.

    You seem to be backing yourself up into a weird position that if something is animated it cannot possibly be offensive or inappropriate. 

    I'm done with you until you can actually contribute.




  • kitaradkitarad Member LegendaryPosts: 6,568
    Wargfoot said:
    kitarad said:
    Wargfoot said:
    kitarad said:

    This idea that what is shown and written refers to real life girls is absurd. Like I said before they are not human beings. They are pure art.
    Again, at any point you'd like to join the actual conversation...


    I already addressed it.



    Even if the creator of the game said they were 2 year olds and children it does not make what is happening in the game sexual exploitation of children. You can take it up with the authorities. 

    I've not equated animated pornographic images with the sexual exploitation of children.

    You seem to be backing yourself up into a weird position that if something is animated it cannot possibly be offensive or inappropriate. 

    I'm done with you until you can actually contribute.



    Your only objection is that children are being portrayed as sexual workers but all the violence and killing they do in the game does not raise any issues. You don't find that offensive.

    If a character hatches out of an egg and then in 5 days is running around slicing and dicing and killing things that violence does not seem inappropriate or offensive but if this 5 day old becomes a sexual worker it is offensive and inappropriate. Do you know how ridiculous your position is? 
    Tuor7cheyane

This discussion has been closed.