Quantcast

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

The latest devblog. Forced PvP is gone.

2456714

Comments

  • CryptoAhashCryptoAhash Member UncommonPosts: 90
    Good news! :)
    Varthanos1Grintch
  • CryptoAhashCryptoAhash Member UncommonPosts: 90
    DeadSpock said:
    I missed so many games I had interest in just cause they had forced PVP like: Aion, Archeage, Black Desert Online. Forced PVP is like a BIG Do Not Enter sign for me.

    Same for me. I do not like PvP at all.
    I do not mind doing some PvP battleground or capture the flag kind of mini scenes, but overall I am a 100% PvE'er.
    bcbullyDeadSpock
  • kitaradkitarad Member EpicPosts: 5,941
    edited January 18
    How is Fortnite and PUBG as far as replacing the loot you lost and experience in a full loot PvP game? Is it difficult to get your gear back, does it require hours of work to get back your gear? Sorry I have very little idea about these two games but they are extremely popular so I wondered.

    Personally I would play a full loot PvP game theoretically speaking if loss of gear is nothing and can be replaced easily. I don't mind getting killed if the consequences are very limited.


  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 36,338
    Kyleran said:
    Whats facinating is it took an alpha test for their devs to come to a conclusion most every MMORPG or survival game player in the last 20 years could have told them right up front, "gankers are gonna gank"

    It's like these devs are babes in the wood with no actual gaming experience at all,  which I find very hard to believe.

    I think like many dev teams before them,  they thought they could include FFA PVP and somehow control the worst of the gankers only to later realize this was almost impossible as most other teams before them also had to admit in the end.

    Let's face it, there's just this bottom dwelling portion of humanity which enjoys preying on the weak and tormenting the helpless.  

    They hate it when others call them out for being the psychopaths they truly are.




    Not everyone who prefers the alpha version of the criminal intent ruleset are people who gank helpless new players. Most of my solo pvp fights were against players in opposing alliances that I came across or people I needed to push out of my farming area. 

    It was a really good pvp game but it’s pve is very shallow. There is no way they have created that much content since the servers went down. I know they did a complete 180 on their vision and are looking for box sales now but trust me, pve focused players will not be satisfied for long
    It's almost as if you didn't read the dev blog. As is almost always the case, it only takes a small number of gankers to ruin it for everyone.

    I well understand PVPer aren't to blame, but gankers definitely are a stain on MMORPG PVP in almost every game which tries to be more open.

    "One of the problems we observed with this system was that some high level players were killing low level players, A LOT. Sometimes exclusively. This often led to solo or group griefing scenarios that created a toxic environment for many players. To be clear, this behavior was not shown by all PvP players, but enough to cause significant issues"
    gervaise1GrintchZegaloth

    "See normal people, I'm not one of them" | G-Easy & Big Sean

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing FO76 at the moment.

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding, but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 36,338
    Aragoni said:
    This comment by the studio head sums up why Im frustrated
    What a damn shame this guy stopped working on the game.
    Sounds to me as if they got rid of the idiot who sold them on the idea he could deliver a FFA PVP game while controlling the worst of the gankers.

    When alpha proved him wrong Amazon wisely kicked him to the curb.
    gervaise1OG_ZorvancheebaGrintchkitaradMendelmaskedweaselZegalothVynt

    "See normal people, I'm not one of them" | G-Easy & Big Sean

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing FO76 at the moment.

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding, but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 36,338
    bcbully said:
    Dead game.

    lets see how long these 20 anti-pvp’r keep
    it alive
    So confused you are, ganking isnt PVP, so the correct way to phrase is "let's see how long these tens of thousands of anti-gank pvp'rs keep it alive."

    Perhaps not long if the game is bad over all, but if that's true allowing ganking wouldn't save it. At least now it has a chance.
    gervaise1maskedweaselDeadSpock

    "See normal people, I'm not one of them" | G-Easy & Big Sean

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing FO76 at the moment.

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding, but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 36,338
    edited January 18
    raapnaap said:
    Alienated their PvP audience and attempting to attract a new PvE audience in... 6 months time, and similar development time.

    Yeah, no. Refunded.

    What a shame. I actually though that for the first time in a decade, someone was going to make a proper open world PvP MMO. Sure, alpha had issues, it was early days... But of all the excellent feedback they received, they opted to go with the nuclear option.
    Err, didn't most people "buy" this game for free back in the day.

    So you refunded nothing?

    Unless you recently bought it, but that would be silly knowing theres a free beta coming up where you could make a decision before purchasing, which surely you wouldn't do, right?

    Or did your inner ganker get the best of you?

     :D 
    gervaise1Zegaloth

    "See normal people, I'm not one of them" | G-Easy & Big Sean

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing FO76 at the moment.

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding, but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • IsilithTehrothIsilithTehroth Member UncommonPosts: 566
    Don't know how people expected a mmorpg out of this game, it was only in development for 1-2 years and while yes, I'd like a Darkfall mmorpg again, the truth is wolves always force the sheep to leave. There should be zone with high yield/rare resources only obtainable there where the game flags you upon entering, it shouldn't just be 1 zone.

    Which brings my next point: Survival game survival based on the harvest(pve), build, raid loop if you take out the main draw for the genre which is the pvp; what else is there to do in game? Stab something over and over because the A I and the game won't have complex pve interactions due to engine limitations from not being designed as a mmorpg from the ground up?

    It takes more than a high player count ,throwing some pve and questing to truly be a mmorpg, there are deep mechanics on almost every facet from the resource trading to player builds and everything else in between.

    The maybe could have go more into a mmorpg direction, but removing pvp and conflict is not a good start, instead they should have added steep penalties(being unable to enter a half assed trade market wasn't) as well as adding things like factions to facilitate helping others instead of just killing everything and everyone(like survival games do)

    MurderHerd

  • fanglofanglo Member UncommonPosts: 314
    This is what happened to me, I started the game played for a little bit then got ganked and lost all my stuff. Came back a bit wiser and the next time I was attacked I was a bit more prepared. The only problem is that when the next guy attacked me because I was low level and had no ranged weopons and no CC when things started going south for him he just ran away from me. There was literally nothing I could do at that point to secure the kill against this ganker. So the risk for him to attempt to gank people was nearly non-existent.
    gervaise1Grintch

    I healed Mistwraith and all I got was this stupid tee-shirt!

  • gervaise1gervaise1 Member EpicPosts: 6,919
    Don't know how people expected a mmorpg out of this game, it was only in development for 1-2 years and while yes, I'd like a Darkfall mmorpg again, <snip>
    We have no idea how long New World has been in "development". Also building a game i snot the same as building a game and an engine.

    I suggest you provide the key to your answer though. Darkfall - which took a long time - was done by a small team. Whereas lot of people working together can do things very fast.
  • OG_ZorvanOG_Zorvan Member EpicPosts: 2,276
    raapnaap said:
    Alienated their PvP audience and attempting to attract a new PvE audience in... 6 months time, and similar development time.

    Yeah, no. Refunded.

    What a shame. I actually though that for the first time in a decade, someone was going to make a proper open world PvP MMO. Sure, alpha had issues, it was early days... But of all the excellent feedback they received, they opted to go with the nuclear option.
    Translation: They gave their game a better chance to succeed and I don't like it.
    GrintchRexKushmanZegaloth


    MMORPG.COM took away my swinging cheerleader butt .gif.

  • AvanahAvanah Member RarePosts: 1,544
    I played this back in Alpha and I am so happy they are getting rid of the "Forced" Part.

    After reading many replies above and see those who are "Not buying" or "Refunding" or whatever sentence they use to display their distaste of not being able to gank anymore, I must say YOU have not played the Game or seen the terrible PvP aspect the Game HAD.

    I'm excited to see what the "MMO" version has in store since they are revamping it pretty much from the ground.
    For those that have the need to Gank....Good riddance! :)

    cheebaGrintchbentrim

    "My Fantasy is having two men at once...

    One Cooking and One Cleaning!"

    ---------------------------

    "A good man can make you feel sexy,

    strong and able to take on the whole world...

    oh sorry...that's wine...wine does that..."





  • gervaise1gervaise1 Member EpicPosts: 6,919
    Wizardry said:
    Did the team learn from the past 20 years or simply forced by their investors...Amazon,citing it as more a business decision than a game design decision?

    Even still,you NEED or must have a solid product in place first,the flags come after.I do not see a solid product ....yet,they still have time to deliver so ,let's see.
    You do indeed need a solid game. Neither you - nor I - have any idea how solid this product will be however.

    Nor do we have any idea what Amazon Game Studios business objectives are. If this was EA or Activision Blizzard then it would be simply: make money. They are part of a bigger picture though and consequently the objectives are probably more complicated.  For example:

    - We know that one objective is for the games to play nice with Twitch. Presumably this means making it possible to run Twitch and an AGS game on a lower spec. machine. Making it possible to have many more streamers. Potentially increasing ad revenue and at the same time promoting AWS games. So indirect revenue via Twitch / advertsing.
    - We know that devs can sign up for Lumberyard and get all the tools etc. at no charge reducing their upfront costs. Amazon are quite open about how they will make money - via Amazon Web Services. Any game that AGS make can therefore be thought of as advertising (showcasing) Lumberyard potentially driving revenue to AWS. So indirect revenue via AWS.
    - Amazon sell stuff. A part of the bigger picture might be to get a bigger slice of the game market just think of Epic's moves. It would be Amazon selling more games though not AWS. Again indirect revenue via the Amazon store.

    Indirect revenue. Indirect revenue. Indirect revenue. And there are probably more links. Amazon Prime links maybe, promoting TV shows via games which promotes Prime, developing IPs for future TV shows. Indeed its worth thinking about their move into TV; they have shown a willingness to kill stuff they decided didn't work but that hasn't stopped their drive into TV.

    Now I am not suggesting that AGS will be allowed to simply burn money and run at a loss. One of the things that Jeff Bezos has shown a willingness to undertake however is long term investments. To grow Amazon. Often to the annoyance of "investors".

    Sounds odd doesn't it - investors not being happy about a company investing in its future!


    So, I suggest, when you throw out the term "business decision" it may be much more complicated when it comes to AGS than it is with e.g. EA, A-B. 
    GrandpaDJ
  • gervaise1gervaise1 Member EpicPosts: 6,919
    Wouldnt it be better if they came up with some interesting way to regulate pvp instead of just disallowing it?

    I am mostly a pve player, but it just breaks the immersion so much for me when I cannot hit other participants in the online world just because of some artificial force.

    Looking forward to having some kids in the game running around me calling me a **** knowing they are safe because of the lack of retaliation. 


    If you manage to come up with a way of doing this you could make a lot of money. 
  • IlayaIlaya Member UncommonPosts: 660
    I like that the forced PvP is gone. I played DaoC and loved PvP back then as i was younger *cough* but now.....i love PvE more and so i can take a look how the Game is. From my perspective a nice move.
    Grintchkitarad
  • HuntrezzHuntrezz Member UncommonPosts: 88
    They just eliminated a deal breaker for a plethora of potential players.
    Grintchbentrim
  • ultimateduckultimateduck Member RarePosts: 777
    It's been stated here many times. Forced PvP doesn't work, especially full loot PvP. A majority of people who play are casual players. They don't want to get ganked repeatedly by some bored power gamer.

    I think Open world PvP is important, but it has to be an open world away from the main world that a player chooses to participate in. Not many games have successfully pulled this off.
  • UngoodUngood Member EpicPosts: 4,212
    bcbully said:
    Dead game.

    lets see how long these 20 anti-pvp’r keep
    it alive
    If there are only 20 Anti-PvP's in the game, why wouldn't all the other players who are looking for a PvP game keep all the players looking for a PvP game occupied. 

    As I see it, the game will be better, as only the people that want to gank PvE players will be upset by this feature, and to be honest, and every game is better off without those players IMHO.
    DeadSpock
    Egotism is the anesthetic that dullens the pain of stupidity, this is why when I try to beat my head against the stupidity of other people, I only hurt myself.
  • raapnaapraapnaap Member UncommonPosts: 455
    edited January 18
    Kyleran said:
    raapnaap said:
    Alienated their PvP audience and attempting to attract a new PvE audience in... 6 months time, and similar development time.

    Yeah, no. Refunded.

    What a shame. I actually though that for the first time in a decade, someone was going to make a proper open world PvP MMO. Sure, alpha had issues, it was early days... But of all the excellent feedback they received, they opted to go with the nuclear option.
    Err, didn't most people "buy" this game for free back in the day.

    So you refunded nothing?

    Unless you recently bought it, but that would be silly knowing theres a free beta coming up where you could make a decision before purchasing, which surely you wouldn't do, right?

    Or did your inner ganker get the best of you?

     :D 
    I pre-ordered on steam for 40 euros, I wasn't a special snowflake and didn't get a free pass. I pre-ordered on the assumption I was buying the game as originally advertised. Then they revealed the 180 degree turn, and last night, confirmed it. Why would I support a game I do not want?

    I never grief new players, it is not why this genre appeals to me, not in the slightest.

    It is the personalized conflict aspect that appeals to me, the sense on never being able to expect what happens, and when a conflict does occur, it would be player driven, personal, relevant, memorable. There have been games that survived for decades on this alone.

    New World is no longer one of them.

    Enjoy your new PvE game... Do not come crying a month after release when you find out you got nothing to do in it.
  • prizm1234prizm1234 Member UncommonPosts: 107
    people who brag about being good at pvp in mmos cant hack real pvp in games designed for it. mmo pvp is trash and always will be.
    UngoodZegalothDeadSpock

    image
  • GroqstrongGroqstrong Member RarePosts: 503
    PvP Players: just make 2 servers PvP and PvE

    PvE Players: Why does no one pvp on our server?
    bentrim
  • kitaradkitarad Member EpicPosts: 5,941
    No one saw my post or answered my question. :/

    Why are games like Fortnite or PUBG so popular? Full loot PvP works so do you lose a lot in Fortnite or PUBG and can you get back up fast was my question. I've never played them so have no idea so I am curious and my opinion is that games where you tend to lose a lot of time or gear when full loot PvP is in force will not be successful and wish to know if I am right about these two games.

    I am aware that you may lose a fortune in EVE but I also read that type of sting takes very long to set up. I also hear people don't fly what you cannot afford to lose leading me to believe people play very carefully. That was the same in Everquest you played carefully there too and could lose everything if you're not careful in it's early days albeit it was a PvE game.

  • Adam1902Adam1902 Member UncommonPosts: 537
    So they turned it into another carebear MMO, this is such a shame.

    Couldn't they at least have certain areas of the world with open PvP and looting (at least inventory looting)? Maybe the "best" gear could require materials gathered from these types of areas.

    I just need the rush of an open PvP MMO again, these days I tend to play survival games for that (Conan Exiles, RUST, etc). This game, is no longer a survival MMO; it's your typical treadmill now. Simply invest "time" for "rewards". No risk, no "gambling" feel, no wins and losses from other people. Just run the treadmill, get stuff. Yay. Boring.

    No reason to group up / join clans for safety, no reason for the trader/gatherer/crafter to roll with PvPers for safety etc and a lot of MMO / community / sandbox dynamics just won't be preasent here anymore.

    I do however like the schedualed, player capped fights for territory control. They had this in Albion Online and it worked great. Prevents nerds / zergs from seiging you at 3am. However I really want some form of open world risk-based PvP. The rush of sneaking up on someone to gank, and the fear of being ganked.

    Didn't Amazon purchase the license for a Lords of the Rings MMO & TV series? I was under the impression that in terms of their MMOs, LOTR was going to be for the little b... Feint of heart casuals, and New World was going to be a more "open" hardcore experience.

    Will still be trying it out, but I'm severely dissapointed.

    Another gear treadmill with no rush, no risk. Yay. Just like the rest.
    rossums

    _________
    Currently playing: Black Desert Korea (Waiting for EU)

    Always hating on instances in MMOs! Open worlds, open PvP, territory control and housing please. More persistence, more fun.

  • MendelMendel Member EpicPosts: 3,894
    Adam1902 said:
    So they turned it into another carebear MMO, this is such a shame.

    Couldn't they at least have certain areas of the world with open PvP and looting (at least inventory looting)? Maybe the "best" gear could require materials gathered from these types of areas.

    I just need the rush of an open PvP MMO again, these days I tend to play survival games for that (Conan Exiles, RUST, etc). This game, is no longer a survival MMO; it's your typical treadmill now. Simply invest "time" for "rewards". No risk, no "gambling" feel, no wins and losses from other people. Just run the treadmill, get stuff. Yay. Boring.

    No reason to group up / join clans for safety, no reason for the trader/gatherer/crafter to roll with PvPers for safety etc and a lot of MMO / community / sandbox dynamics just won't be preasent here anymore.

    I do however like the schedualed, player capped fights for territory control. They had this in Albion Online and it worked great. Prevents nerds / zergs from seiging you at 3am. However I really want some form of open world risk-based PvP. The rush of sneaking up on someone to gank, and the fear of being ganked.

    Didn't Amazon purchase the license for a Lords of the Rings MMO & TV series? I was under the impression that in terms of their MMOs, LOTR was going to be for the little b... Feint of heart casuals, and New World was going to be a more "open" hardcore experience.

    Will still be trying it out, but I'm severely dissapointed.

    Another gear treadmill with no rush, no risk. Yay. Just like the rest.

    Amazon is all about the income.  PvE games tend to do better financially than PvP games, with more longevity.  Additionally, PvP games require more support to deal with player-created issues.  Amazon changed the direction of New World in order to make more money.



    Adam1902bcbullyDeadSpock

    Logic, my dear, merely enables one to be wrong with great authority.

  • UngoodUngood Member EpicPosts: 4,212
    kitarad said:
    No one saw my post or answered my question. :/

    Why are games like Fortnite or PUBG so popular? Full loot PvP works so do you lose a lot in Fortnite or PUBG and can you get back up fast was my question. I've never played them so have no idea so I am curious and my opinion is that games where you tend to lose a lot of time or gear when full loot PvP is in force will not be successful and wish to know if I am right about these two games.

    I am aware that you may lose a fortune in EVE but I also read that type of sting takes very long to set up. I also hear people don't fly what you cannot afford to lose leading me to believe people play very carefully. That was the same in Everquest you played carefully there too and could lose everything if you're not careful in it's early days albeit it was a PvE game.
    As someone that enjoyed Fortnight. The thing it, it's fast come, and fast go. You don't spend hours, months, years, collecting your gear. You got your 10 minute game to rush in and gather as you go, and fight till you win or die.

    That is what makes it fun, the game is about the thrill of the Fight, in the PvP itself is what shines. You are not stuck in some long ass PvE gathering process to collect gear, or make some perfect build, or any of that.

    Fortnight is a PvP game, pure, honest, brutal, and to the point. We go in and fight till the last person is standing, no BS, no Carebears, No one has any misconceptions about what is about to happen when they jump off that Bus, you will fight till you die, everything else in the game is just a means to that swift end.

    It's really beautiful in it's own way.
    Iselin
    Egotism is the anesthetic that dullens the pain of stupidity, this is why when I try to beat my head against the stupidity of other people, I only hurt myself.
Sign In or Register to comment.