Quantcast

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Who else is super hyped about this game?

24567

Comments

  • GutlardGutlard Member RarePosts: 1,019
    We'll see how PvP turns out.
    I don't need to get FFA'd down to my undies to enjoy some good PvP.
    It's going to be totally different than what I played during the first week of alpha though.
    I'm always a little hyped and hopeful of new games coming out, no matter how many let downs I've lived through.
    They can't all be bad....right?

    I tried to see how long it's been in development, since it's coming out May '20. Show these dev's how to churn some shit out already!

    Gut Out!
    lunatis

    What, me worry?

  • Haki88Haki88 Member UncommonPosts: 130
    limited to 50v50, mostly PvE..... they should just make offline rpg game with ability to connect to remote pcs and play with friends :)
  • MaxBaconMaxBacon Member EpicPosts: 7,275
    They vastly cut the scope.

    I played the Alpha and the design made sense with the scope, without it, the MMO won't live that much beyond the standard MMO we've been used to.

    I do am mixed about its success, will check in once the gameplay tests begin to see where it is now since the pre-alpha.
    Kyleran
  • goboygogoboygo Member RarePosts: 2,140
    Is this going to be EA or are they shipping a finished vision, then just adding content?
  • BruceYeeBruceYee Member EpicPosts: 1,947
    Back when PvP wasn't limited to 50vs50 instanced battles I was excited to see how it was going to turn out. It was giving off a 3D Albion vibe which had me kind of excited.
    Now though it's feeling like a H1Z1 battle royale just with extra people.
    This entire game now from everything being limited just to release asap is feeling so much like H1Z1 before launch.
  • bentrimbentrim Member UncommonPosts: 299
    edited January 4
    Looks to be a heavily coated PVP game. That's why there is not much hype. Don't devs realize that the vast majority of people that play MMORPGs, DO NOT want PVP. HEAVY pass on this one. Another one gets buried after 6 months.
    bcbullyphoenixfire2
  • UtinniUtinni Member EpicPosts: 1,904
    I wanna be excited for it but I get the feeling it'll just be built for streamers. It's smart on amazon's part but not my cup of tea. Who knows? Maybe it'll be awesome ? Remember the guy who said H1Z1 was a game for SWG players to be excited about? Yea he works at Amazon now!

    "It's got a heavy amount of sandbox elements that made SWG what it was," explained Smedley.

    Yikes!
  • IselinIselin Member LegendaryPosts: 14,394
    goboygo said:
    Is this going to be EA or are they shipping a finished vision, then just adding content?
    When has there ever been an MMO that was finished at launch?
    KylerancheebaRich84Sovrath
    “Microtransactions? In a single player role-playing game? Are you nuts?” 
    ― CD PROJEKT RED

    "... the "influencers" which is the tech name we call sell outs now..."
    __ Wizardry, 2020
  • lunatislunatis Member UncommonPosts: 261
    They confirmed NO LOOT BOXES today. That's good news. I'm very hopeful about this game ? We will get the big pvpve news the comming week and another alpha very soon too!
    Kyleran
  • RaquisRaquis Member RarePosts: 1,018
    DrunkWolf said:
    everything sounds good and fun, but i just cant let myself get hyped anymore about games coming out. been let down way to many times.

    Will need to play the beta to see.
    yes, I don't buy games if I don't investigate first ill watch the beta on twitch the only games I buy without any question is the games from From Soft and Team Ninja, Dark Souls games and Nioh.
    lunatis
  • TheocritusTheocritus Member EpicPosts: 7,659
    We shall see but I'd rather support some Indie than Amazon.
    lunatisNorseGod
  • trikerytrikery Member UncommonPosts: 9
    edited January 9
    Haki88 said:
    limited to 50v50, mostly PvE..... they should just make offline rpg game with ability to connect to remote pcs and play with friends :)
    This felt like a miscommunication in the German article, having played Alpha I can understand how this could have been mistaken.  The same can be said for the toggling which could have been poorly explained.  
  • ArglebargleArglebargle Member RarePosts: 2,838
    My interest is totally dependent  on how they handle the pvp/pve.   Wasn't interested before, might be interested now.  Depending.... 

    If you are holding out for the perfect game, the only game you play will be the waiting one.

  • MensurMensur Member RarePosts: 920
    I am not looking forward to this game. 1000 people on a single server- meh.
    NorseGod

    Proud MMORPG.com member since 2009! 




  • RaquisRaquis Member RarePosts: 1,018
    We shall see but I'd rather support some Indie than Amazon.
    all gaming companies are scum and big companies like Amazon we just play the games for entertainment if you only wanted to play games from companies that had people that were really good moral people you would never have had any games to play they are all evil that's the world we live in.
    Kyleran
  • NorseGodNorseGod Member EpicPosts: 2,634
    edited January 9
    Mensur said:
    1000 people on a single server


    Kyleranalkarionlog
    To talk about games without the censorship, check out https://www.reddit.com/r/MMORPG/
  • Azaron_NightbladeAzaron_Nightblade Member EpicPosts: 4,825
    Moderately hyped. I was going to give it a complete pass when it was still generic survival gankfest #467437, but I might actually try it now depending on what I see of the rest of the features and gameplay.

    My SWTOR referral link for those wanting to give the game a try. (Newbies get a welcome package while returning players get a few account upgrades to help with their preferred status.)

    https://www.ashesofcreation.com/ref/Callaron/

  • lunatislunatis Member UncommonPosts: 261
    NorseGod said:
    Mensur said:
    1000 people on a single server



    They said AT LEAST 1000 people per server. Once you see the map and understand the scope of the battlefields you'll understand why that makes sense. It's an open world, they need to be able to manage all these people heading to a war if they have to.
  • AmatheAmathe Member LegendaryPosts: 7,336
    For Christmas I got some new socks. That was vastly more exciting to me.
    mmolouKyleran

    EQ1, EQ2, SWG, SWTOR, GW, GW2 CoH, CoV, FFXI, WoW, CO, War,TSW and a slew of free trials and beta tests

  • NorseGodNorseGod Member EpicPosts: 2,634
    lunatis said:
    NorseGod said:
    Mensur said:
    1000 people on a single server



    They said AT LEAST 1000 people per server. Once you see the map and understand the scope of the battlefields you'll understand why that makes sense. It's an open world, they need to be able to manage all these people heading to a war if they have to.
    Nope. They are limited by a poor engine not because they are doing it for "reasons".
    Rovn
    To talk about games without the censorship, check out https://www.reddit.com/r/MMORPG/
  • SavageHorizonSavageHorizon Member RarePosts: 3,432
    edited January 9
    Mensur said:
    I am not looking forward to this game. 1000 people on a single server- meh.

    If there are loads of players about, do you really count how many players are online. If you join a guild and it's lively, do you really notice. 

    Don't get me wrong, I want as many people as possible on a server but your comment is pathetic.

    One thousand people on a server at anyone time in this day and age is a good start imo.

    How long has it been since we have had a non CF tripple A mmo to look forward to in the west, years I would say. To think that you are moaning over a one thousand server population which is a minimum is pathetic.

    Perhaps the mmo genra has made some of us jaded to the point where we are not even prepared to give a western non CF mmo a chance. 
    Azaron_Nightblade




  • NorseGodNorseGod Member EpicPosts: 2,634
    DMKano said:
    With PvP being 50v50

    1000 per server is pretty pointless 
    And of course, there's that. Good point.
    To talk about games without the censorship, check out https://www.reddit.com/r/MMORPG/
  • Azaron_NightbladeAzaron_Nightblade Member EpicPosts: 4,825
    NorseGod said:
    lunatis said:
    NorseGod said:
    Mensur said:
    1000 people on a single server



    They said AT LEAST 1000 people per server. Once you see the map and understand the scope of the battlefields you'll understand why that makes sense. It's an open world, they need to be able to manage all these people heading to a war if they have to.
    Nope. They are limited by a poor engine not because they are doing it for "reasons".
    Or they want to keep it organized instead of everything turning into zerg guilds.
    50 vs 50 is more than enough to make for a good battle.

    My SWTOR referral link for those wanting to give the game a try. (Newbies get a welcome package while returning players get a few account upgrades to help with their preferred status.)

    https://www.ashesofcreation.com/ref/Callaron/

  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 36,338
    NorseGod said:
    lunatis said:
    NorseGod said:
    Mensur said:
    1000 people on a single server



    They said AT LEAST 1000 people per server. Once you see the map and understand the scope of the battlefields you'll understand why that makes sense. It's an open world, they need to be able to manage all these people heading to a war if they have to.
    Nope. They are limited by a poor engine not because they are doing it for "reasons".
    Or they want to keep it organized instead of everything turning into zerg guilds.
    50 vs 50 is more than enough to make for a good battle.
    But not enough for a decent war.

    I want to re-fight the Battle for Helms Deep, 50 on 50 just won't do.


    bcbully

    "See normal people, I'm not one of them" | G-Easy & Big Sean

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing FO76 at the moment.

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding, but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • coretex666coretex666 Member EpicPosts: 3,838
    Anyone who played this game has any idea how it is supposed to be different from games like Dark & Light, Citadel Forged with Fire, etc.?

    Also, what should be the long term appeal? Is it organized pve (e.g. raids like in WoW), long term vertical progression, organized pvp (like large scale fantasy CoD / CS), constructing (like e.g. Landmark), politics (like e.g. L2), complex crafting, or something different?
Sign In or Register to comment.