Quantcast

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

SC makes PC Gamers worst micro transactions list

1678911

Comments

  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 36,353
    Orinori said:
    I love seeing Star Citizen under heavy attack, it usually means something amazing in SC is just about to be revealed!

    8 DAYS TO GO! 
    The only information they could share which would fall into the amazing category would be projected release dates for SQ42.


    Phaserlight

    "See normal people, I'm not one of them" | G-Easy & Big Sean

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing FO76 at the moment.

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding, but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • MaxBaconMaxBacon Member EpicPosts: 7,275
    edited December 2017
    Kyleran said:
    Orinori said:
    I love seeing Star Citizen under heavy attack, it usually means something amazing in SC is just about to be revealed!

    8 DAYS TO GO! 
    The only information they could share which would fall into the amazing category would be projected release dates for SQ42.

    Should be close enough. Unlikely dates but more likely the production report detailing SQ42, together with the long-awaited gameplay demo of it.

    The forum rage against SC intensifies around the times of its big events, pretty standard seeing the past years of this forum tbh, we'd be better by tuning in "Let it Go" and let it rage on \o/
    Post edited by MaxBacon on
  • VrikaVrika Member EpicPosts: 6,422
    MaxBacon said:
    Kyleran said:
    Orinori said:
    I love seeing Star Citizen under heavy attack, it usually means something amazing in SC is just about to be revealed!

    8 DAYS TO GO! 
    The only information they could share which would fall into the amazing category would be projected release dates for SQ42.

    That is what will happen. Unlikely dates but more likely the production report detailing SQ42, together with the long-awaited gameplay demo of it.
    Did you mean to write "that won't happen"?
     
  • KefoKefo Member EpicPosts: 4,229
    Kyleran said:
    Orinori said:
    I love seeing Star Citizen under heavy attack, it usually means something amazing in SC is just about to be revealed!

    8 DAYS TO GO! 
    The only information they could share which would fall into the amazing category would be projected release dates for SQ42.


    Projected release dates that will be used to drive sales and then will be pushed back x amount of times 
    bcbully
  • BabuinixBabuinix Member EpicPosts: 3,056
    How dare gaming companies to showcase the direction the game is heading to their backers! Naughty them ! So much better to be kept in the dark crying in the forums for space legs an atmospheric landings :D
  • MadFrenchieMadFrenchie Member LegendaryPosts: 8,505
    Babuinix said:
    How dare gaming companies to showcase the direction the game is heading to their backers! Naughty them ! So much better to be kept in the dark crying in the forums for space legs an atmospheric landings :D
    Annnnndddd there's where you go from excited backer to troll.
    kikoodutroa8

    image
  • BabuinixBabuinix Member EpicPosts: 3,056
    edited December 2017
    Babuinix said:
    How dare gaming companies to showcase the direction the game is heading to their backers! Naughty them ! So much better to be kept in the dark crying in the forums for space legs an atmospheric landings :D
    Annnnndddd there's where you go from excited backer to troll.
    So anything goes when it's about Star Citizen but if it touches games you're found of it's trolling...Alrighty then. :D
  • MadFrenchieMadFrenchie Member LegendaryPosts: 8,505
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    How dare gaming companies to showcase the direction the game is heading to their backers! Naughty them ! So much better to be kept in the dark crying in the forums for space legs an atmospheric landings :D
    Annnnndddd there's where you go from excited backer to troll.
    So anything goes when it's about Star Citizen but if it touches games you're found of it's trolling...Alrighty then. :D
    Anything goes?  Where did you get that impression?

    And I'm not fond of E:D any more than I'm fond of, say, Banner Saga.  Its a solid game I've delved into only lightly.  But Frontier decided to give players a released game and build from there.  It stands in Stark contrast to the way CIG I'd handling the development of this game.

    image
  • BabuinixBabuinix Member EpicPosts: 3,056
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    How dare gaming companies to showcase the direction the game is heading to their backers! Naughty them ! So much better to be kept in the dark crying in the forums for space legs an atmospheric landings :D
    Annnnndddd there's where you go from excited backer to troll.
    So anything goes when it's about Star Citizen but if it touches games you're found of it's trolling...Alrighty then. :D
    Anything goes?  Where did you get that impression?

    And I'm not fond of E:D any more than I'm fond of, say, Banner Saga.  Its a solid game I've delved into only lightly.  But Frontier decided to give players a released game and build from there.  It stands in Stark contrast to the way CIG I'd handling the development of this game.
    Yeah and thank god for that, nobody would want Star Citizen to go the ED route. The last 4 years after ED release and how the game evolved, or the lack of it are a testimony of how much gamers prefer Star Citizen, the funding show's it clearly too.

    Orinori
  • KefoKefo Member EpicPosts: 4,229
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    How dare gaming companies to showcase the direction the game is heading to their backers! Naughty them ! So much better to be kept in the dark crying in the forums for space legs an atmospheric landings :D
    Annnnndddd there's where you go from excited backer to troll.
    So anything goes when it's about Star Citizen but if it touches games you're found of it's trolling...Alrighty then. :D
    Anything goes?  Where did you get that impression?

    And I'm not fond of E:D any more than I'm fond of, say, Banner Saga.  Its a solid game I've delved into only lightly.  But Frontier decided to give players a released game and build from there.  It stands in Stark contrast to the way CIG I'd handling the development of this game.
    Yeah and thank god for that, nobody would want Star Citizen to go the ED route. The last 4 years after ED release and how the game evolved, or the lack of it are a testimony of how much gamers prefer Star Citizen, the funding show's it clearly too.

    You mean release and then build upon the base game like frontier is doing? Not adding everything and the kitchen sink before release like Roberts is doing which he said he wouldn't do?
  • MadFrenchieMadFrenchie Member LegendaryPosts: 8,505
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    How dare gaming companies to showcase the direction the game is heading to their backers! Naughty them ! So much better to be kept in the dark crying in the forums for space legs an atmospheric landings :D
    Annnnndddd there's where you go from excited backer to troll.
    So anything goes when it's about Star Citizen but if it touches games you're found of it's trolling...Alrighty then. :D
    Anything goes?  Where did you get that impression?

    And I'm not fond of E:D any more than I'm fond of, say, Banner Saga.  Its a solid game I've delved into only lightly.  But Frontier decided to give players a released game and build from there.  It stands in Stark contrast to the way CIG I'd handling the development of this game.
    Yeah and thank god for that, nobody would want Star Citizen to go the ED route. The last 4 years after ED release and how the game evolved, or the lack of it are a testimony of how much gamers prefer Star Citizen, the funding show's it clearly too.

    And to think, your previous post in the chain was a claim that I was fanboying Elite and overly critical of SC...

    image
  • OrinoriOrinori Member RarePosts: 751
    I couldn't afford to play ED. Besides I played it in the 80's anyway. 
    Babuinix
  • BabuinixBabuinix Member EpicPosts: 3,056
    Kefo said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    How dare gaming companies to showcase the direction the game is heading to their backers! Naughty them ! So much better to be kept in the dark crying in the forums for space legs an atmospheric landings :D
    Annnnndddd there's where you go from excited backer to troll.
    So anything goes when it's about Star Citizen but if it touches games you're found of it's trolling...Alrighty then. :D
    Anything goes?  Where did you get that impression?

    And I'm not fond of E:D any more than I'm fond of, say, Banner Saga.  Its a solid game I've delved into only lightly.  But Frontier decided to give players a released game and build from there.  It stands in Stark contrast to the way CIG I'd handling the development of this game.
    Yeah and thank god for that, nobody would want Star Citizen to go the ED route. The last 4 years after ED release and how the game evolved, or the lack of it are a testimony of how much gamers prefer Star Citizen, the funding show's it clearly too.

    You mean release and then build upon the base game like frontier is doing? Not adding everything and the kitchen sink before release like Roberts is doing which he said he wouldn't do?
    You mean rush it to release to make a buck and then spend the next 4 years of development trying to clean up the mess lol?
  • NildenNilden Member EpicPosts: 3,115
    Babuinix said:
    Kefo said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    How dare gaming companies to showcase the direction the game is heading to their backers! Naughty them ! So much better to be kept in the dark crying in the forums for space legs an atmospheric landings :D
    Annnnndddd there's where you go from excited backer to troll.
    So anything goes when it's about Star Citizen but if it touches games you're found of it's trolling...Alrighty then. :D
    Anything goes?  Where did you get that impression?

    And I'm not fond of E:D any more than I'm fond of, say, Banner Saga.  Its a solid game I've delved into only lightly.  But Frontier decided to give players a released game and build from there.  It stands in Stark contrast to the way CIG I'd handling the development of this game.
    Yeah and thank god for that, nobody would want Star Citizen to go the ED route. The last 4 years after ED release and how the game evolved, or the lack of it are a testimony of how much gamers prefer Star Citizen, the funding show's it clearly too.

    You mean release and then build upon the base game like frontier is doing? Not adding everything and the kitchen sink before release like Roberts is doing which he said he wouldn't do?
    You mean rush it to release to make a buck and then spend the next 4 years of development trying to clean up the mess lol?
    Obviously they should have put out a tech demo and sold .jpgs of spaceships.

    "You CAN'T buy ships for RL money." - MaxBacon

    "classification of games into MMOs is not by rational reasoning" - nariusseldon

    Love Minecraft. And check out my Youtube channel OhCanadaGamer



  • BabuinixBabuinix Member EpicPosts: 3,056
    Nilden said:
    Babuinix said:
    Kefo said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    How dare gaming companies to showcase the direction the game is heading to their backers! Naughty them ! So much better to be kept in the dark crying in the forums for space legs an atmospheric landings :D
    Annnnndddd there's where you go from excited backer to troll.
    So anything goes when it's about Star Citizen but if it touches games you're found of it's trolling...Alrighty then. :D
    Anything goes?  Where did you get that impression?

    And I'm not fond of E:D any more than I'm fond of, say, Banner Saga.  Its a solid game I've delved into only lightly.  But Frontier decided to give players a released game and build from there.  It stands in Stark contrast to the way CIG I'd handling the development of this game.
    Yeah and thank god for that, nobody would want Star Citizen to go the ED route. The last 4 years after ED release and how the game evolved, or the lack of it are a testimony of how much gamers prefer Star Citizen, the funding show's it clearly too.

    You mean release and then build upon the base game like frontier is doing? Not adding everything and the kitchen sink before release like Roberts is doing which he said he wouldn't do?
    You mean rush it to release to make a buck and then spend the next 4 years of development trying to clean up the mess lol?
    Obviously they should have put out a tech demo and sold .jpgs of spaceships.
    Yeah maybe they should instead of releasing half asset games as "finished" and then charging more for DLC's that should be in the base game... ;)
  • MadFrenchieMadFrenchie Member LegendaryPosts: 8,505
    Babuinix said:
    Nilden said:
    Babuinix said:
    Kefo said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    How dare gaming companies to showcase the direction the game is heading to their backers! Naughty them ! So much better to be kept in the dark crying in the forums for space legs an atmospheric landings :D
    Annnnndddd there's where you go from excited backer to troll.
    So anything goes when it's about Star Citizen but if it touches games you're found of it's trolling...Alrighty then. :D
    Anything goes?  Where did you get that impression?

    And I'm not fond of E:D any more than I'm fond of, say, Banner Saga.  Its a solid game I've delved into only lightly.  But Frontier decided to give players a released game and build from there.  It stands in Stark contrast to the way CIG I'd handling the development of this game.
    Yeah and thank god for that, nobody would want Star Citizen to go the ED route. The last 4 years after ED release and how the game evolved, or the lack of it are a testimony of how much gamers prefer Star Citizen, the funding show's it clearly too.

    You mean release and then build upon the base game like frontier is doing? Not adding everything and the kitchen sink before release like Roberts is doing which he said he wouldn't do?
    You mean rush it to release to make a buck and then spend the next 4 years of development trying to clean up the mess lol?
    Obviously they should have put out a tech demo and sold .jpgs of spaceships.
    Yeah maybe they should instead of releasing half asset games as "finished" and then charging more for DLC's that should be in the base game... ;)
    The hypocrisy is astounding.

    image
  • BabuinixBabuinix Member EpicPosts: 3,056
    Babuinix said:
    Nilden said:
    Babuinix said:
    Kefo said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    How dare gaming companies to showcase the direction the game is heading to their backers! Naughty them ! So much better to be kept in the dark crying in the forums for space legs an atmospheric landings :D
    Annnnndddd there's where you go from excited backer to troll.
    So anything goes when it's about Star Citizen but if it touches games you're found of it's trolling...Alrighty then. :D
    Anything goes?  Where did you get that impression?

    And I'm not fond of E:D any more than I'm fond of, say, Banner Saga.  Its a solid game I've delved into only lightly.  But Frontier decided to give players a released game and build from there.  It stands in Stark contrast to the way CIG I'd handling the development of this game.
    Yeah and thank god for that, nobody would want Star Citizen to go the ED route. The last 4 years after ED release and how the game evolved, or the lack of it are a testimony of how much gamers prefer Star Citizen, the funding show's it clearly too.

    You mean release and then build upon the base game like frontier is doing? Not adding everything and the kitchen sink before release like Roberts is doing which he said he wouldn't do?
    You mean rush it to release to make a buck and then spend the next 4 years of development trying to clean up the mess lol?
    Obviously they should have put out a tech demo and sold .jpgs of spaceships.
    Yeah maybe they should instead of releasing half asset games as "finished" and then charging more for DLC's that should be in the base game... ;)
    The hypocrisy is astounding.
    Indeed, better save up 45$ so that I can land on atmospheric planets and another 45% so that I can get out of my ship! :D
  • KefoKefo Member EpicPosts: 4,229
    Babuinix said:
    Kefo said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    How dare gaming companies to showcase the direction the game is heading to their backers! Naughty them ! So much better to be kept in the dark crying in the forums for space legs an atmospheric landings :D
    Annnnndddd there's where you go from excited backer to troll.
    So anything goes when it's about Star Citizen but if it touches games you're found of it's trolling...Alrighty then. :D
    Anything goes?  Where did you get that impression?

    And I'm not fond of E:D any more than I'm fond of, say, Banner Saga.  Its a solid game I've delved into only lightly.  But Frontier decided to give players a released game and build from there.  It stands in Stark contrast to the way CIG I'd handling the development of this game.
    Yeah and thank god for that, nobody would want Star Citizen to go the ED route. The last 4 years after ED release and how the game evolved, or the lack of it are a testimony of how much gamers prefer Star Citizen, the funding show's it clearly too.

    You mean release and then build upon the base game like frontier is doing? Not adding everything and the kitchen sink before release like Roberts is doing which he said he wouldn't do?
    You mean rush it to release to make a buck and then spend the next 4 years of development trying to clean up the mess lol?
    I think in this instance I would prefer Frontiers rush to release then spend the time cleaning it up as opposed to CIG method of giving dates, missing them by huge margins, releasing buggy modules and then forgetting about them, overhyping features to sell ships that cost a hell of a lot more then 45 dollars, scrap work and start again and don't forget more hyping for cash
  • BabuinixBabuinix Member EpicPosts: 3,056
    edited December 2017
    Kefo said:
    Babuinix said:
    Kefo said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    How dare gaming companies to showcase the direction the game is heading to their backers! Naughty them ! So much better to be kept in the dark crying in the forums for space legs an atmospheric landings :D
    Annnnndddd there's where you go from excited backer to troll.
    So anything goes when it's about Star Citizen but if it touches games you're found of it's trolling...Alrighty then. :D
    Anything goes?  Where did you get that impression?

    And I'm not fond of E:D any more than I'm fond of, say, Banner Saga.  Its a solid game I've delved into only lightly.  But Frontier decided to give players a released game and build from there.  It stands in Stark contrast to the way CIG I'd handling the development of this game.
    Yeah and thank god for that, nobody would want Star Citizen to go the ED route. The last 4 years after ED release and how the game evolved, or the lack of it are a testimony of how much gamers prefer Star Citizen, the funding show's it clearly too.

    You mean release and then build upon the base game like frontier is doing? Not adding everything and the kitchen sink before release like Roberts is doing which he said he wouldn't do?
    You mean rush it to release to make a buck and then spend the next 4 years of development trying to clean up the mess lol?
    I think in this instance I would prefer Frontiers rush to release then spend the time cleaning it up as opposed to CIG method of giving dates, missing them by huge margins, releasing buggy modules and then forgetting about them, overhyping features to sell ships that cost a hell of a lot more then 45 dollars, scrap work and start again and don't forget more hyping for cash
    My 2 Star Citizen accounts cost me less than your Elite+Horizons package. I already can fly any ship I put my sight on, walk inside and around them, eva out of them, engage in fps battles, land on atmospheric planets, drive both rovers and space bikes all seamless without loading screens and with the company of my friends.

    Anyway... Good luck & fun playing ED, I'm sure you find the time to do so in-between the another tedious cargo/passenger's run.
  • MadFrenchieMadFrenchie Member LegendaryPosts: 8,505
    Babuinix said:
    Kefo said:
    Babuinix said:
    Kefo said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    How dare gaming companies to showcase the direction the game is heading to their backers! Naughty them ! So much better to be kept in the dark crying in the forums for space legs an atmospheric landings :D
    Annnnndddd there's where you go from excited backer to troll.
    So anything goes when it's about Star Citizen but if it touches games you're found of it's trolling...Alrighty then. :D
    Anything goes?  Where did you get that impression?

    And I'm not fond of E:D any more than I'm fond of, say, Banner Saga.  Its a solid game I've delved into only lightly.  But Frontier decided to give players a released game and build from there.  It stands in Stark contrast to the way CIG I'd handling the development of this game.
    Yeah and thank god for that, nobody would want Star Citizen to go the ED route. The last 4 years after ED release and how the game evolved, or the lack of it are a testimony of how much gamers prefer Star Citizen, the funding show's it clearly too.

    You mean release and then build upon the base game like frontier is doing? Not adding everything and the kitchen sink before release like Roberts is doing which he said he wouldn't do?
    You mean rush it to release to make a buck and then spend the next 4 years of development trying to clean up the mess lol?
    I think in this instance I would prefer Frontiers rush to release then spend the time cleaning it up as opposed to CIG method of giving dates, missing them by huge margins, releasing buggy modules and then forgetting about them, overhyping features to sell ships that cost a hell of a lot more then 45 dollars, scrap work and start again and don't forget more hyping for cash
    My 2 Star Citizen accounts cost me less than your Elite+Horizons package. I already can fly any ship I put my sight on, walk inside and around them, eva out of them, engage in fps battles, land on atmospheric planets, drive both rovers and space bikes all seamless without loading screens and with the company of my friends.

    Anyway... Good luck & fun playing ED, I'm sure you find the time to do so in-between the another tedious cargo/passenger's run.
    I think this is where folks used to say "cool story bruh."

    image
  • BabuinixBabuinix Member EpicPosts: 3,056
    Babuinix said:
    Kefo said:
    Babuinix said:
    Kefo said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    How dare gaming companies to showcase the direction the game is heading to their backers! Naughty them ! So much better to be kept in the dark crying in the forums for space legs an atmospheric landings :D
    Annnnndddd there's where you go from excited backer to troll.
    So anything goes when it's about Star Citizen but if it touches games you're found of it's trolling...Alrighty then. :D
    Anything goes?  Where did you get that impression?

    And I'm not fond of E:D any more than I'm fond of, say, Banner Saga.  Its a solid game I've delved into only lightly.  But Frontier decided to give players a released game and build from there.  It stands in Stark contrast to the way CIG I'd handling the development of this game.
    Yeah and thank god for that, nobody would want Star Citizen to go the ED route. The last 4 years after ED release and how the game evolved, or the lack of it are a testimony of how much gamers prefer Star Citizen, the funding show's it clearly too.

    You mean release and then build upon the base game like frontier is doing? Not adding everything and the kitchen sink before release like Roberts is doing which he said he wouldn't do?
    You mean rush it to release to make a buck and then spend the next 4 years of development trying to clean up the mess lol?
    I think in this instance I would prefer Frontiers rush to release then spend the time cleaning it up as opposed to CIG method of giving dates, missing them by huge margins, releasing buggy modules and then forgetting about them, overhyping features to sell ships that cost a hell of a lot more then 45 dollars, scrap work and start again and don't forget more hyping for cash
    My 2 Star Citizen accounts cost me less than your Elite+Horizons package. I already can fly any ship I put my sight on, walk inside and around them, eva out of them, engage in fps battles, land on atmospheric planets, drive both rovers and space bikes all seamless without loading screens and with the company of my friends.

    Anyway... Good luck & fun playing ED, I'm sure you find the time to do so in-between the another tedious cargo/passenger's run.
    I think this is where folks used to say "cool story bruh."
    I can run you through the process if you need assistance.
  • KefoKefo Member EpicPosts: 4,229
    Babuinix said:
    Kefo said:
    Babuinix said:
    Kefo said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    How dare gaming companies to showcase the direction the game is heading to their backers! Naughty them ! So much better to be kept in the dark crying in the forums for space legs an atmospheric landings :D
    Annnnndddd there's where you go from excited backer to troll.
    So anything goes when it's about Star Citizen but if it touches games you're found of it's trolling...Alrighty then. :D
    Anything goes?  Where did you get that impression?

    And I'm not fond of E:D any more than I'm fond of, say, Banner Saga.  Its a solid game I've delved into only lightly.  But Frontier decided to give players a released game and build from there.  It stands in Stark contrast to the way CIG I'd handling the development of this game.
    Yeah and thank god for that, nobody would want Star Citizen to go the ED route. The last 4 years after ED release and how the game evolved, or the lack of it are a testimony of how much gamers prefer Star Citizen, the funding show's it clearly too.

    You mean release and then build upon the base game like frontier is doing? Not adding everything and the kitchen sink before release like Roberts is doing which he said he wouldn't do?
    You mean rush it to release to make a buck and then spend the next 4 years of development trying to clean up the mess lol?
    I think in this instance I would prefer Frontiers rush to release then spend the time cleaning it up as opposed to CIG method of giving dates, missing them by huge margins, releasing buggy modules and then forgetting about them, overhyping features to sell ships that cost a hell of a lot more then 45 dollars, scrap work and start again and don't forget more hyping for cash
    My 2 Star Citizen accounts cost me less than your Elite+Horizons package. I already can fly any ship I put my sight on, walk inside and around them, eva out of them, engage in fps battles, land on atmospheric planets, drive both rovers and space bikes all seamless without loading screens and with the company of my friends.

    Anyway... Good luck & fun playing ED, I'm sure you find the time to do so in-between the another tedious cargo/passenger's run.
    Who says I own ED?
  • MadFrenchieMadFrenchie Member LegendaryPosts: 8,505
    Kefo said:
    Babuinix said:
    Kefo said:
    Babuinix said:
    Kefo said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    Babuinix said:
    How dare gaming companies to showcase the direction the game is heading to their backers! Naughty them ! So much better to be kept in the dark crying in the forums for space legs an atmospheric landings :D
    Annnnndddd there's where you go from excited backer to troll.
    So anything goes when it's about Star Citizen but if it touches games you're found of it's trolling...Alrighty then. :D
    Anything goes?  Where did you get that impression?

    And I'm not fond of E:D any more than I'm fond of, say, Banner Saga.  Its a solid game I've delved into only lightly.  But Frontier decided to give players a released game and build from there.  It stands in Stark contrast to the way CIG I'd handling the development of this game.
    Yeah and thank god for that, nobody would want Star Citizen to go the ED route. The last 4 years after ED release and how the game evolved, or the lack of it are a testimony of how much gamers prefer Star Citizen, the funding show's it clearly too.

    You mean release and then build upon the base game like frontier is doing? Not adding everything and the kitchen sink before release like Roberts is doing which he said he wouldn't do?
    You mean rush it to release to make a buck and then spend the next 4 years of development trying to clean up the mess lol?
    I think in this instance I would prefer Frontiers rush to release then spend the time cleaning it up as opposed to CIG method of giving dates, missing them by huge margins, releasing buggy modules and then forgetting about them, overhyping features to sell ships that cost a hell of a lot more then 45 dollars, scrap work and start again and don't forget more hyping for cash
    My 2 Star Citizen accounts cost me less than your Elite+Horizons package. I already can fly any ship I put my sight on, walk inside and around them, eva out of them, engage in fps battles, land on atmospheric planets, drive both rovers and space bikes all seamless without loading screens and with the company of my friends.

    Anyway... Good luck & fun playing ED, I'm sure you find the time to do so in-between the another tedious cargo/passenger's run.
    Who says I own ED?
    No one did, he just wants to trumpet SC not a full page of posts after accusing me of talking down SC in favor of E:D, ensuring his hypocrisy level hits 11.

    image
  • Tiamat64Tiamat64 Member RarePosts: 1,537
    edited December 2017
    Orinori said:
    I love seeing Star Citizen under heavy attack, it usually means something amazing in SC is just about to be revealed!

    8 DAYS TO GO! 
    We definately got something amazing, that's for sure.
    MaxBaconkikoodutroa8
  • OrinoriOrinori Member RarePosts: 751
    Tiamat64 said:
    Orinori said:
    I love seeing Star Citizen under heavy attack, it usually means something amazing in SC is just about to be revealed!

    8 DAYS TO GO! 
    We definately got something amazing, that's for sure.
    I can feel it too! stay strong. 

    7 DAYS TO GO!
    kikoodutroa8
Sign In or Register to comment.