Mmo-play.com take on the Star Citizen Loan drama

Babuinix

Basically what everyone without a biased hate for CIG said: Storm in a cup of water made by the usual suspects.

http://mmo-play.com/mmo-blog/how-star-citizen-loan-got-blown-out-of-proportion

Cotic

I liked Jingles video on the thing

Octagon7711

Thought this was done with long ago.

Kefo

Octagon7711 said:

Thought this was done with long ago.

It was but it's allowed to be brought back up when you find another website that says it's just over reacting lol

bwwianakiev

Kefo said:

Octagon7711 said:

Thought this was done with long ago.

It was but it's allowed to be brought back up when you find another website that says it's just over reacting lol

I love your 2688 posts on Star Citizen hate. It's quite sad

CrazKanuk

Kefo said:

Octagon7711 said:

Thought this was done with long ago.

It was but it's allowed to be brought back up when you find another website that says it's just over reacting lol

So your belief is that multiple sources is a bad thing? 

I didn't realize that there was a website. I just remember it as a statement, along with an AWS link to details of the loan along with online commentary by the usual suspects and detractors. I think that most of the published articles are saying it was blown out of proportion. 

I'm glad we're making conspiracy theorists look less nutty though. For a while there it was touch and go. 

Octagon7711

I see the odd article or video still pop up from time to time still but just consider it clickbait so don't even bother.

Kefo

CrazKanuk said:

Kefo said:

Octagon7711 said:

Thought this was done with long ago.

It was but it's allowed to be brought back up when you find another website that says it's just over reacting lol

So your belief is that multiple sources is a bad thing? 

I didn't realize that there was a website. I just remember it as a statement, along with an AWS link to details of the loan along with online commentary by the usual suspects and detractors. I think that most of the published articles are saying it was blown out of proportion. 

I'm glad we're making conspiracy theorists look less nutty though. For a while there it was touch and go. 

Oh please. You know good and well that if one of the "haters" was to post a brand new discussion with a website link (see that link in the OP? That's the website) that people would be all over it how we are beating a dead horse. Course when a fan posts a link it's considered multiple sources.

Cotic

Kefo said:

CrazKanuk said:

Kefo said:

Octagon7711 said:

Thought this was done with long ago.

It was but it's allowed to be brought back up when you find another website that says it's just over reacting lol

So your belief is that multiple sources is a bad thing? 

I didn't realize that there was a website. I just remember it as a statement, along with an AWS link to details of the loan along with online commentary by the usual suspects and detractors. I think that most of the published articles are saying it was blown out of proportion. 

I'm glad we're making conspiracy theorists look less nutty though. For a while there it was touch and go. 

Oh please. You know good and well that if one of the "haters" was to post a brand new discussion with a website link (see that link in the OP? That's the website) that people would be all over it how we are beating a dead horse. Course when a fan posts a link it's considered multiple sources.

As someone who does try to remain reasonably neutral in all this debate, the above is very true.

Kefo

bwwianakiev said:

Kefo said:

Octagon7711 said:

Thought this was done with long ago.

It was but it's allowed to be brought back up when you find another website that says it's just over reacting lol

I love your 2688 posts on Star Citizen hate. It's quite sad

You're new here so I'll give you a pass this time on your poor attempt at trolling. Can you please try harder next time please?

CrazKanuk

Kefo said:

CrazKanuk said:

Kefo said:

Octagon7711 said:

Thought this was done with long ago.

It was but it's allowed to be brought back up when you find another website that says it's just over reacting lol

So your belief is that multiple sources is a bad thing? 

I didn't realize that there was a website. I just remember it as a statement, along with an AWS link to details of the loan along with online commentary by the usual suspects and detractors. I think that most of the published articles are saying it was blown out of proportion. 

I'm glad we're making conspiracy theorists look less nutty though. For a while there it was touch and go. 

Oh please. You know good and well that if one of the "haters" was to post a brand new discussion with a website link (see that link in the OP? That's the website) that people would be all over it how we are beating a dead horse. Course when a fan posts a link it's considered multiple sources.

Please, PLEASE! Give me a valid source that tells of the horrors of this. Give me a Forbes. If you want to debate, that's one thing, but if you think your neutral then you're obviously further gone than what I thought. We've had conversations offline about some of this shit and I thought you were fairly logical at that time, but if you actually believe some of the shit that you're peddling, MAN! Either I was way off, or you've fallen off the sane train. 

Kefo

CrazKanuk said:

Kefo said:

CrazKanuk said:

Kefo said:

Octagon7711 said:

Thought this was done with long ago.

It was but it's allowed to be brought back up when you find another website that says it's just over reacting lol

So your belief is that multiple sources is a bad thing? 

I didn't realize that there was a website. I just remember it as a statement, along with an AWS link to details of the loan along with online commentary by the usual suspects and detractors. I think that most of the published articles are saying it was blown out of proportion. 

I'm glad we're making conspiracy theorists look less nutty though. For a while there it was touch and go. 

Oh please. You know good and well that if one of the "haters" was to post a brand new discussion with a website link (see that link in the OP? That's the website) that people would be all over it how we are beating a dead horse. Course when a fan posts a link it's considered multiple sources.

Please, PLEASE! Give me a valid source that tells of the horrors of this. Give me a Forbes. If you want to debate, that's one thing, but if you think your neutral then you're obviously further gone than what I thought. We've had conversations offline about some of this shit and I thought you were fairly logical at that time, but if you actually believe some of the shit that you're peddling, MAN! Either I was way off, or you've fallen off the sane train. 

I'm not sure what you're on but what valid source can I give for my opinion and looking through the posts on here. If I were to post an article/website right now in a new discussion then I would probably be accused of beating a dead horse.