Quantcast

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

I Wanted Mass Effect 4 But Got Something Better - Mass Effect: Andromeda Review - MMORPG.com

145791016

Comments

  • SovrathSovrath Member LegendaryPosts: 28,264
    edited March 2017

    You find that funny?


    Not funny "har har" funny as in peculiar or ridiculous.



  • CrazKanukCrazKanuk Member EpicPosts: 6,130
    how with these game breaking cons he can give it 8.7

    if you like story that much... go read book

    this game terrible

    Simply put, because you don't rate a game using one metric. How is it that we can play something like Stardew Valley and love it, yet these animations are game-breaking? 

    You have a number of performance indicators when you write a review and that one indicator, say graphics, will take some kind of hit based on something like animations. However, when you're reviewing something objectively, it doesn't mean that a few poor animations or a bad UI are game-breaking issues. 

    Honestly, I think it's actually hilarious that you would say something like "if you like story that much.... go read a book." Lol. It's sad that someone would actually make this comment being that Mass Effect is known for deep stories. In fact, people essentially lost their minds with the ME3 ending. 

    Anyway, the point is that these issues aren't game-breaking. Game-breaking issues would be something like intermittent and continuous crashes. I can't comment on the entirety of the game, nor can you, but it should be interesting to see how problematic these things are in the wild. 

    BTW, the PC version is hovering around 8/10 right now, so maybe you should suspend your disbelief and read a couple other reviews to understand why they enjoyed it. 

    Crazkanuk

    ----------------
    Azarelos - 90 Hunter - Emerald
    Durnzig - 90 Paladin - Emerald
    Demonicron - 90 Death Knight - Emerald Dream - US
    Tankinpain - 90 Monk - Azjol-Nerub - US
    Brindell - 90 Warrior - Emerald Dream - US
    ----------------

  • deniterdeniter Member RarePosts: 1,367
    SBFord said:
    What I find funny is that when "professional reviewers" rate a game highly but the gamer population doesn't, it's pitchforks and torches because they're all shills.

    When reviewers pan a game, it's sunshine and roses and "See? They know what they're talking about". 

    :D
    And how about the case when "professional reviewers" rate a game very poorly and gamer population agree? That's right, it will never happen. Professionals always have to praise a game or they'll lose beta access, pre-launch testing and what not. Stating that a game is not very good is out of question.

    There's always about 50% chance gamers will agree with the professionals. :)
  • AoriAori Member EpicPosts: 4,179
    deniter said:
    SBFord said:
    What I find funny is that when "professional reviewers" rate a game highly but the gamer population doesn't, it's pitchforks and torches because they're all shills.

    When reviewers pan a game, it's sunshine and roses and "See? They know what they're talking about". 

    :D
    And how about the case when "professional reviewers" rate a game very poorly and gamer population agree? That's right, it will never happen. Professionals always have to praise a game or they'll lose beta access, pre-launch testing and what not. Stating that a game is not very good is out of question.

    There's always about 50% chance gamers will agree with the professionals. :)
    This is not true at all.
  • deniterdeniter Member RarePosts: 1,367
    Aori said:
    deniter said:
    SBFord said:
    What I find funny is that when "professional reviewers" rate a game highly but the gamer population doesn't, it's pitchforks and torches because they're all shills.

    When reviewers pan a game, it's sunshine and roses and "See? They know what they're talking about". 

    :D
    And how about the case when "professional reviewers" rate a game very poorly and gamer population agree? That's right, it will never happen. Professionals always have to praise a game or they'll lose beta access, pre-launch testing and what not. Stating that a game is not very good is out of question.

    There's always about 50% chance gamers will agree with the professionals. :)
    This is not true at all.
    Most of the time it's true, and you know it.
  • CrazKanukCrazKanuk Member EpicPosts: 6,130
    deniter said:
    SBFord said:
    What I find funny is that when "professional reviewers" rate a game highly but the gamer population doesn't, it's pitchforks and torches because they're all shills.

    When reviewers pan a game, it's sunshine and roses and "See? They know what they're talking about". 

    :D
    And how about the case when "professional reviewers" rate a game very poorly and gamer population agree? That's right, it will never happen. Professionals always have to praise a game or they'll lose beta access, pre-launch testing and what not. Stating that a game is not very good is out of question.

    There's always about 50% chance gamers will agree with the professionals. :)

    That's not true at all, lol. 

    Dude!! For realsies, it took me like less than a minute to source this. 
    http://www.metacritic.com/browse/games/release-date/new-releases/pc/userscore

    I think it's probably more like a 20/60/20 rule, but there are definitely cases where critics have rated lower than the user. Also, this URL also shows games that critics were overly harsh with. These are just new releases, too. 

    The problem is how can you honestly remain objective by saying that a game is 0/10? I think that in the HISTORY of Gamespot there have been like 1 game that was 1/10. 

    Crazkanuk

    ----------------
    Azarelos - 90 Hunter - Emerald
    Durnzig - 90 Paladin - Emerald
    Demonicron - 90 Death Knight - Emerald Dream - US
    Tankinpain - 90 Monk - Azjol-Nerub - US
    Brindell - 90 Warrior - Emerald Dream - US
    ----------------

  • SovrathSovrath Member LegendaryPosts: 28,264
    how with these game breaking cons he can give it 8.7

    if you like story that much... go read book

    this game terrible
    Do you not find that particular statement a bit ironic with the forum handle RPGMASTERGAMER?



  • immodiumimmodium Member RarePosts: 2,603
    edited March 2017
    Unfortunately this is how review scores are judged now. For me they've been pretty much pointless, now even more so.


    image
  • deniterdeniter Member RarePosts: 1,367
    CrazKanuk said:
    deniter said:
    SBFord said:
    What I find funny is that when "professional reviewers" rate a game highly but the gamer population doesn't, it's pitchforks and torches because they're all shills.

    When reviewers pan a game, it's sunshine and roses and "See? They know what they're talking about". 

    :D
    And how about the case when "professional reviewers" rate a game very poorly and gamer population agree? That's right, it will never happen. Professionals always have to praise a game or they'll lose beta access, pre-launch testing and what not. Stating that a game is not very good is out of question.

    There's always about 50% chance gamers will agree with the professionals. :)

    That's not true at all, lol. 

    Dude!! For realsies, it took me like less than a minute to source this. 
    http://www.metacritic.com/browse/games/release-date/new-releases/pc/userscore

    I think it's probably more like a 20/60/20 rule, but there are definitely cases where critics have rated lower than the user. Also, this URL also shows games that critics were overly harsh with. These are just new releases, too. 

    The problem is how can you honestly remain objective by saying that a game is 0/10? I think that in the HISTORY of Gamespot there have been like 1 game that was 1/10. 
    I don't think any game that is for sale is 0/10 or even 1/10. If you refer to my previous post i've accepted many people give scores like 0 and 1 or 10 for very subjective reasons. But if there are lots and lots more people giving a zero than those who give 10 you can make some conclusions.

    There are some games the critics can review as they please, and some they can review as they have to. ME:A is one of the latter - Bioware and EA are names way too big to mess with.
  • immodiumimmodium Member RarePosts: 2,603
    Sovrath said:
    how with these game breaking cons he can give it 8.7

    if you like story that much... go read book

    this game terrible
    Do you not find that particular statement a bit ironic with the forum handle RPGMASTERGAMER?
    They obviously play RPGs for the maths. =)

    image
  • DistopiaDistopia Member EpicPosts: 21,182
    edited March 2017
    immodium said:
    Unfortunately this is how review scores are judged now. For me they've been pretty much pointless, now even more so.


    Many people only like stuff that is tearing other stuff down today, that's basically the way of things. They don't like objective grounded in what matters opinions, they like sensationalized flamboyance. That's why i shy away from reviews in general today, as the clicks and money are truly in pointing out what is wrong with everything. 

    The emotional Angry Joe's, The overtly exaggerated satirists, etc... That's how these folks make so much money off of what they do, they know the cynical hipster know it all attitude is prevalent so they exploit the hell out of it. 

    For every minute you are angry , you lose 60 seconds of happiness."-Emerson


  • renstarensta Member RarePosts: 624

    SBFord said:

    For those bitching about graphics, let's take a look at the Universal Game for Comparison, or UGC, The Witcher 3



    The irony runs deeps wouldn't you say? :D



    You are comparing normal gameplay to random glitches..... So yeah.... You can't compare those....

    image


    Basically clicking away text windows ruins every MMO, try to have fun instead of rushing things. Without story and lore all there is left is a bunch of mechanics.
    Reply
    Add Multi-Quote

  • TheDarkrayneTheDarkrayne Member EpicPosts: 5,297
    edited March 2017
    Here's what you need to know about most gamers and AAA releases...

    There is only awesome or crap, there is nothing in between. That is what's fashionable.
    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
  • renstarensta Member RarePosts: 624

    Reizla said:



    I think this review tells it all (at least for me). I'll wait for a $20 sale or 2nd hand copy for PS4 (which should not take too long...)



    Great review! More people should watch.

    image


    Basically clicking away text windows ruins every MMO, try to have fun instead of rushing things. Without story and lore all there is left is a bunch of mechanics.
    Reply
    Add Multi-Quote

  • FrammshammFrammshamm Member UncommonPosts: 322

    xelrah said:

    Now comes the point I’m surprised to having to address. The Internet’s biggest gripe with the game and the reason for petty witch-hunts: animation. Despite what you might have heard up to now, it is not that bad. Really. Occasionally, there might be a slightly weird facial expression or a stiff look another character gives you, but mostly it is people making a mountain out of molehill. In addition, let me be frank here: if you play(ed) Mass Effect and / or Dragon Age for graphics, you’re doing it wrong.







    Except that things like this completely ruin any immersion. Just check that facial expression in dialogue at 38 second +



    I havent read a single article about this game. Bioware just doesnt hit my radar anymore. This article came up first on the MMORPG.com feed tho and the first thing i noticed was " OMFG, what is up with that chick's face" in the screenshot. The I scrolled down to the still of her holding a gun and thought .."geebus, is this what AA has come to"? I didnt read a word of the article and still dont know shit about the game. Then I clicked on this video... then I clicked on it again, and again and again. I think i got a solid 15 minutes straight of hard, gut-busting laughing. Thank you so much for those endorphins.
  • tixylixtixylix Member UncommonPosts: 1,288
    I watched this game for 10 hours on a Stream, it's complete crap, I dunno how you gave it 8.7
  • DistopiaDistopia Member EpicPosts: 21,182
    tixylix said:
    I watched this game for 10 hours on a Stream, it's complete crap, I dunno how you gave it 8.7
    You watched a game for 10hours but it's crap?  lol

    For every minute you are angry , you lose 60 seconds of happiness."-Emerson


  • kitaradkitarad Member EpicPosts: 5,743
    Distopia said:
    tixylix said:
    I watched this game for 10 hours on a Stream, it's complete crap, I dunno how you gave it 8.7
    You watched a game for 10hours but it's crap?  lol
    @Distopia my thoughts precisely.

  • laseritlaserit Member LegendaryPosts: 6,270
    Distopia said:
    tixylix said:
    I watched this game for 10 hours on a Stream, it's complete crap, I dunno how you gave it 8.7
    You watched a game for 10hours but it's crap?  lol


    ;)

    "Be water my friend" - Bruce Lee

  • JeroKaneJeroKane Member RarePosts: 6,279
    edited March 2017
    One hour and 30 minutes and all hell will break lose on the internet.

    I am so glad I didn't pre-order. The more gameplay videos I have seen today, the sicker I get in my stomach of what has become of the once fantastic ME franchise. :anguished:

    I thought that just the old lead writer had left, but apparently they have lost them all, replaced them by college students or something?

    And what happened to their senior animation artists? The more gameplay videos I see.... after ME 1, 2 and 3.... I just can't believe this is made by the same studio. :anguished:

    How the hell did this manage to get gold status and release in this state?
  • kalcakalca Member UncommonPosts: 43
    All i see is cry about graphical bugs but what about game itself.They changed game so much from first one that its hardly same game anymore.
  • sdeleon515sdeleon515 Member UncommonPosts: 151


    The animation thing is understandable - but why are we OK with Fallout 4 and Dragon Age's same issue and suddenly it's a problem with MEA?



    It might be alternative facts messing with my head but I remember it was a big gripe with Fallout 4; that the graphics were a huge complaint followed with the game physics being funky at times. Idk why ppl say "everyone was alright with Fallout 4" graphics in this day, because it was never the case.

    https://gamerant.com/bethesda-fallout-4-graphics-complaints-114/

    http://www.gamespresso.com/2015/06/were-not-really-complaining-about-fallout-4s-graphics-are-we/

    ...you know what just google it and yeah, it was ALWAYS A FRIGGIN WITH TONS OF PPL! Even with the Witcher when it released ppl were hoping for a better engine to be utilized. The biggest counter-argument was the whole "graphics vs game hours playable" argument that was honestly valid; Dragon's Age, Fallout and The Witcher went to the side of "we're not graphically beautiful but you get so much content and playtime than you would with any Ubisoft game really. I still think Andromeda is going to be a great game but I think the animation will hurt it for GoTY contender with Horizon Zero Dawn and Zelda: Breath of the Wild being rare games where graphics, immersion strong storylines and development will make a case for themselves above Andromeda. I'll officially call it on Horizon because of its lack of lineage and history versus Zelda.
  • GorweGorwe Member EpicPosts: 6,533
    JeroKane said:
    One hour and 30 minutes and all hell will break lose on the internet.

    I am so glad I didn't pre-order. The more gameplay videos I have seen today, the sicker I get in my stomach of what has become of the once fantastic ME franchise. :anguished:

    I thought that just the old lead writer had left, but apparently they have lost them all, replaced them by college students or something?

    And what happened to their senior animation artists? The more gameplay videos I see.... after ME 1, 2 and 3.... I just can't believe this is made by the same studio. :anguished:

    How the hell did this manage to get gold status and release in this state?

    Most likely because BW(whichever of the three) did their economic homework and researched the market and presented a gold lined profit prediction to their EA overlords. Then the EA approved it. And mark my words:

    This game's gonna turn a profit and a half! Sheep simply M.U.S.T. have their things...
  • Gobstopper3DGobstopper3D Member RarePosts: 878
    rensta said:

    Reizla said:



    I think this review tells it all (at least for me). I'll wait for a $20 sale or 2nd hand copy for PS4 (which should not take too long...)



    Great review! More people should watch.
    Certainly the best review I have seen yet.  I see a common thread in many reviews besides the graphics, it's the story and characters.  Just not as strong in this one.   My biggest fear was that they put to much focus on overhauling game play at the determent of something else and in this case I think it may be what bioware games are known for, characters and story.

    I'm not an IT Specialist, Game Developer, or Clairvoyant in real life, but like others on here, I play one on the internet.

  • MaxBaconMaxBacon Member EpicPosts: 7,262
    edited March 2017
    The game is just fine. The only thing that shows itself sub-par is indeed the animations, especially within the faces, if they raise the quality bar on the rest of the game they should have noticed how this animation moments wouldn't just fly by.

    Something to play \o/

Sign In or Register to comment.