Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Who makes better games: Indie or AAA?

mgilbrtsnmgilbrtsn Member EpicPosts: 3,430
edited January 2017 in The Pub at MMORPG.COM
In numerous threads, people bemoan AAA games or Indie games, depending on your thinking.  Overall, who do you think is better at it?  The big boys or the little guys?  The argument is generally that the AAA games have the funds, but have lost their zest for the spirit of MMOs.  The Small guys have the zest, but lack the funds.

I self identify as a monkey.

«1

Comments

  • Loke666Loke666 Member EpicPosts: 21,441
    I can't vote there, it is the games ideas that makes a great game, not how the devs get the funding for it. Minecraft was indie made abut it was the ideas that made it great, nothing else.

    AAA games generally have better funding and that means that they are generally running better at launch. 

    It is easier to get funding for weirder ideas as a small independent dev though, but to be fair might that just be because most indie games have way lower budget, that a $20M risky project is easier to get money for then a $100M risky project is of course a no-brainer.
  • OhhPaigeyOhhPaigey Member RarePosts: 1,517
    edited January 2017
    AAA.

    MMOs & non MMOs.

    That being said, I've played quite a few fun indie games, they just never manage to compare though.
    When all is said and done, more is always said than done.
  • mgilbrtsnmgilbrtsn Member EpicPosts: 3,430
    Loke666 said:
    I can't vote there, it is the games ideas that makes a great game, not how the devs get the funding for it. Minecraft was indie made abut it was the ideas that made it great, nothing else.

    AAA games generally have better funding and that means that they are generally running better at launch. 

    It is easier to get funding for weirder ideas as a small independent dev though, but to be fair might that just be because most indie games have way lower budget, that a $20M risky project is easier to get money for then a $100M risky project is of course a no-brainer.
    I just mentioned funding as one of the main arguments.  There is a lot more to it, I agree.  The question is more about which games have the most 'it' as a general rule when they succeed.  I'm not really talking about the ones that fail our of the gate.

    I self identify as a monkey.

  • KyleranKyleran Member LegendaryPosts: 43,505
    Define "games."

    We talking MMORPG's, or including single player titles as well?


    "True friends stab you in the front." | Oscar Wilde 

    "I need to finish" - Christian Wolff: The Accountant

    Just trying to live long enough to play a new, released MMORPG, playing New Worlds atm

    Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions. Pvbs 18:2, NIV

    Don't just play games, inhabit virtual worlds™

    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon






  • 45074507 Member UncommonPosts: 351
    AAA MMOs always feel like they're missing something to me, but indie MMOs feel 'complete'. 

    I'm oddly the opposite for single player games, though; I find indie games to be low quality with not enough gameplay variation from their AAA counterparts to justify it.
  • immodiumimmodium Member RarePosts: 2,610
    edited January 2017
    Kyleran said:
    Define "games."

    We talking MMORPG's, or including single player titles as well?


    I'm taking it includes ALL computer games.

    Voted AAA. For every crap AAA you'll find 20 crap indie ones. There's just far more garbage within the indie scene.
    Post edited by immodium on

    image
  • JamesGoblinJamesGoblin Member RarePosts: 1,242
    Kyleran said:
    Define "games."

    We talking MMORPG's, or including single player titles as well?


    Yea, and don't forget to define "better" too.

    I went indies for patriotic reasons, but my favorite MMOs so far are certainly AAAs - Warhammer, Age of Conan, Vanilla & BC WoW.
     W...aaagh?
  • TholdarianTholdarian Member UncommonPosts: 67
    Generally speaking it's 'playing it safe, but optimizing it to the moon and back' vs 'we have really innovative ideas, but need to pay the bills with the leftover cash we found between our sofa cushions'.

    Indies potentially make the better games, but since everyone is so used to having at least basic functionality and/or clarity in UI design, art direction and graphics that don't look like the PS2 era, they mostly fall short.
  • ShaighShaigh Member EpicPosts: 2,142
    I enjoy games that are made on a big budget, some are on a smaller budget and a few are made on a tiny budget. I refuse to vote on one being better than the other because they deliver different aspects of gaming that I enjoy.
    Iselin: And the next person who says "but it's a business, they need to make money" can just go fuck yourself.
  • BuccaneerBuccaneer Member UncommonPosts: 654
    I found this a difficult question to vote on at this point of time.

    At present I would suggest that AAA games are better than the indie's, but lets face it you cannot compare games like Darkfall and Mortal Online to games like ESO and SWTOR.  (Sorry I will not include the endless survival games as MMORPG's).

    Hopefully this will change by the end of this year or in 2018 with the release of indie games like Pantheon, Crowfall, Camelot Unchained and not forgetting everyone's favourite Star Citizen :)

    I still feel that AAA games will still win out in the production values, but hopefully the indie's can return the soul and make MMO's a world instead of a fancy single path lobby based game.
  • AeliousAelious Member RarePosts: 3,521
    Can't vote, at least not yet. AAA  = better quality, Indie = better ideas. You need both IMO to be called better than the other. In two years I believe I'll be able to answer this as the indies that really have a shot at "making it" will be out.
  • meddlingmagemeddlingmage Member CommonPosts: 7
    Tough question to be sure
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.

    거북이는 목을 내밀 때 안 움직입니다












  • WizardryWizardry Member LegendaryPosts: 19,332
    Indie games are never better than 5/10  big budget games are hit n miss but always potential to be better than 5/10.
    Following a brief look at my timeline...some very early games Might N magic ,Ultima...then a big step up to Quake..Unreal...Eq series..FFXI..Dishonored..several more games in between but the best games were big budget  games.

    We also have to be careful what game we tag as Indie,i have seen tons of experienced game developers labeled as Indie.Indie games tend to be arpg's,moba's,facebook,browser,mobile all the lowest budget platforms you can build a game.Big developers will of course jump in on these markets and sadly will not do them any better,just the same with a different twist or different cash shop.

    Also looking back on my gaming...until EQ2 switched over,not one of my games had a cash shop.Now even single player games are releasing early so they can sell DLC's,basically ripping off the consumer.

    Never forget 3 mile Island and never trust a government official or company spokesman.

  • ste2000ste2000 Member EpicPosts: 6,194
    Definitely Indie or Small Companies, these are usually the trend setters.
    Some of these small companies later became big Corporations due the popularity of their games, but some retained the Small Company mentality at heart, putting the quality of their games first before the profit.

    There are 3 Companies that started as Indie and became Corporations which still have my respect for creating beautiful games and in some cases true Classics.

    1) Bethesda: For the Elder Scroll Series.
    TES is my favorite game franchise of all time, I started playing Arena (TES 1) and I just fell in love with the whole series, it just got better and better.
    They kick started the trend of seamless 3D RPGs games with Daggerfall (TES 2) in a period dominated by isometric games like Baldur's Gate and Ultima.
    With Morrowind they reached to the masses and more Studios started making 3D RPGs due to its success.
    Even though today Bethesda is one of the biggest game Corporations, they don't cut corners, and as a result the artistic quality of their games is outstanding, bugs and all (it's called Bugtesda for a reason).
    Though Fallout wasn't originally their IP, they really did justice to its legacy. Same could be said for Doom.
    And with ESO they proved they could make good games for the MMO market as well.

    2) Bioware: The Masters of RPGs.
    While Ultima is the daddy of Isometric RPG games, Bioware brought the genre to a new level with Baldur's Gate. True Classic.
    But they didn't stop there, they consistently delivered throughout the years with Neverwinter Nights, Dragon Age and Mass Effect, even though SWTOR was a bit disappointing in my opinion.
    Even after Muzyka and Zeschuk's departure the Studio kept producing great stuff.

    3) Blizzard: The King Midas of gaming
    Whatever they touch, they turn it into gold.
    Say what you like about Blizzard but they can do no wrong, even though they stopped being original more than a decade ago, they are the ones that made the RTS games popular with Warcraft and Starcraft, and basically created the Hack and Slash genre with Diablo.
    But obviously their biggest success is WoW which brought MMORPGs to the masses, a true Classic of gaming.
    The quality of Blizzard games is always high standard, and though they are starting to lose touch with their huge fan base, they are still a great Company in my opinion.


  • mgilbrtsnmgilbrtsn Member EpicPosts: 3,430
    Kyleran said:
    Define "games."

    We talking MMORPG's, or including single player titles as well?


    I'm a traditionalist.  MMOs on MMORPG.com.

    I self identify as a monkey.

  • YashaXYashaX Member EpicPosts: 3,098
    Most of my favorite games are made by established game companies (I guess that's what you mean by AAA). Minecraft and Cubeworld are the only indie games I can think off the top of my head that I really liked (if talking pc/console games).

    Its not just a matter of funding, AAA games also use experienced programmers and artists, whereas a lot of indie games are made by people who are just starting out. It will be interesting to see how Crowfall and CU go since even though they lack major funding, they are being made by pros.

    Note: if you include games like Divinuity Original Sin as "Indie" then I will need another category "They all rock". 
    ....
  • lukezlukez Member UncommonPosts: 27
    i voted AAA because most games i play are AAA which right now are only EQ2, there sadly aren't a lot of indie MMORPG's out there right now, but the coming releases of AAA and indie...
    the indie side definitely has the advantage if they can deliver what they promised...

    AAA companies puke out a lot of reguritated garbage (FIFA, Battlefield, COD.......) same games different skins....
    for some reason those games still get high ratings? there are some amazing indie games out there... binding of isaac, faster than light.... sadly very few mmorpg's and even fewer good ones
  • mgilbrtsnmgilbrtsn Member EpicPosts: 3,430
    Kyleran said:
    Define "games."

    We talking MMORPG's, or including single player titles as well?


    Yea, and don't forget to define "better" too.

    I went indies for patriotic reasons, but my favorite MMOs so far are certainly AAAs - Warhammer, Age of Conan, Vanilla & BC WoW.
    Better is subjective.  Use your own definition to answer your question.  Don't want to chase this down a rabbit hole.

    I self identify as a monkey.

  • BurntvetBurntvet Member RarePosts: 3,465
    edited January 2017
    At least as far as MMORPGs go: none of the above. Most of the AAA companies have moved on from making "big" MMOs, leaving only underfunded indie fails like Pathfinder online, Mortal online and the Repopulation, and un-localized, crap, pay to win Asian imports MMOs. MMORPGs are in a very bad place just now.
  • AethaerynAethaeryn Member RarePosts: 3,149
    I can only say they are both good. . If the indie ideas could get the budget of AAA and the team size and follow-through ahhh. . .what a game that . . might be :)

    Wa min God! Se æx on min heafod is!

  • nerovergilnerovergil Member UncommonPosts: 680
    as long its good, just take my money
  • DKLondDKLond Member RarePosts: 2,273
    Any game's quality depends on the time, talent and resources available.

    There's no inherent marker of quality based on budget alone.

    That said, I would tend to prefer AAA games - but they need to be funded by "suits with a semblance of courage and vision" - meaning they're extremely rare. Games like WoW, DDO, LotRO, TSW, AoC and a few others are all games of significant budgets and publishers with SOME courage - enabling the developers enough time to do something decent. They're all far from ideal, however.

    Indie games are severely limited when it comes to the density and quality of content, simply because of the resource/manpower factor. There's no way around that - and I'm not interested in playing a game that revolves around mechanics almost exclusively. I need content and a reason to actually invest.

    The ideal would be something else entirely - and the dream of Star Citizen is an example of that. We'll have to see if they can pull that one off, though.
  • BlurBlehBlurBleh Member UncommonPosts: 162
    AAA. They have more time, money, people, and greater accountability. Some times people just have too high expectations of them.
  • ConstantineMerusConstantineMerus Member EpicPosts: 3,338
    edited January 2017
    I think the question should be who makes better games? Indie or non-indie studios. That means developer teams shall be free to do whatever they want, or the actual supervision and etc. of a publisher keeps them on the ground and might result in a better quality and a more solid schedule. 

    I myself can't answer that, because it has been different case by case. There are projects ruined by publishers, and they are projects ruined by developers. Someone gotta do a count and let us know--and if you factor in the size of the project you can never have any answer here! :)

    AAA means budget. So you're asking who makes better games, people with less money or people with more money? Can't imagine a situation where having less of a budget would actually help a project. 
    Constantine, The Console Poster

    • "One of the most difficult tasks men can perform, however much others may despise it, is the invention of good games and it cannot be done by men out of touch with their instinctive selves." - Carl Jung
Sign In or Register to comment.