Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

That Tera banner makes me wonder.

filmoretfilmoret Palm Bay, FLMember EpicPosts: 4,906
Is that a little girl on the right with the short skirt where you can almost see her ******?  Man that is just too much sexualization of what appears to be a little girl for me.
Are you onto something or just on something?
«1

Comments

  • carotidcarotid Member UncommonPosts: 425
    Makes you wonder what kind of people play this.
  • Sid_ViciousSid_Vicious Portland, ORMember UncommonPosts: 2,125
    Must be Asian . .. they have plenty of pervy anime shows that are little girls as young as 13 being sexy.. probably anime porn of it too. Weird. What I don't understand is how it is so widely accepted there, yet other things (like smoking pot) is totally wrong.

    NEWS FLASH! A bank was robbed the other day and a man opened fire on the customers being held hostage. One customer zig-zag sprinted until he found cover. When questioned later he explained that he was a hardcore Darkfall Online player and knew just what to do.

    Watch me play Darkfall and sometimes PVP in other MMORPGs on Twitch.

    Darkfall has launched!!! MAY 5th!! Join before its too late!

    Follow my RP blog here: http://riseofagon.blogspot.com/



  • Adjuvant1Adjuvant1 Peoria, ILMember RarePosts: 2,100
    Is this one of those "ha ha, made you look" kind of things? I'm not an anime person, in any sense, and it just looks like a rabbit person to me.


  • UrncallerUrncaller Ashton, ILMember UncommonPosts: 167
    edited May 2016
    Its a race that is actually very old but look eternally young...I play the game but that is only one race of many and yeah it ias a asian mmo so to be expected....but I dont look at them that way...Suppose depends on the person that looks at  them that way and thinks that.
    Post edited by Urncaller on
  • VrikaVrika FinlandMember EpicPosts: 5,256
    edited May 2016
    It's cultural thing.

    One could also say that's its the Americans who are sick for worrying whether a child's pussy shows or not, when you know that the game has graphics about that child killing others and being killed by others.
    Post edited by Vrika on
     
  • filmoretfilmoret Palm Bay, FLMember EpicPosts: 4,906
    I believe there is a difference between making a cute little girl and making it look sexual.  Then they make it worse by saying they are 100 years old.  So that is suppose to be a little  girl who is actually an adult and don't feel bad about looking at her legs.
    Are you onto something or just on something?
  • holdenhamletholdenhamlet Member EpicPosts: 3,756
    Adjuvant1 said:
    Is this one of those "ha ha, made you look" kind of things? I'm not an anime person, in any sense, and it just looks like a rabbit person to me.


    One has to wonder why the OP was looking "there."  I imagine he has a very "hard time" at beaches if there are 12 year olds in bikinis running around.

    "Oh dear, I can almost see their you-know-whats!"
  • holdenhamletholdenhamlet Member EpicPosts: 3,756
    filmoret said:
    I believe there is a difference between making a cute little girl and making it look sexual.  Then they make it worse by saying they are 100 years old.  So that is suppose to be a little  girl who is actually an adult and don't feel bad about looking at her legs.
    You shouldn't feel bad about looking at her legs, but the way your staring at them- yeah maybe you should feel bad.
  • filmoretfilmoret Palm Bay, FLMember EpicPosts: 4,906
    Vrika said:
    It's cultural thing.

    One could also say that's its the Americans who are sick for worrying whether a child's pussy shows or not, when you know that the game has graphics about that child killing others and being killed by others.
    Any culture that doesn't care about little girls private parts is sick and demented.  Nice defensive stance there.  You really are on the wrong side right now.
    Are you onto something or just on something?
  • RamajamaRamajama BratislavaMember UncommonPosts: 271
    Try putting your filthy hands on her and she will chop your head off. I wouldn't worry about her. 
  • carotidcarotid Member UncommonPosts: 425
    Adjuvant1 said:
    Is this one of those "ha ha, made you look" kind of things? I'm not an anime person, in any sense, and it just looks like a rabbit person to me.


    One has to wonder why the OP was looking "there."  I imagine he has a very "hard time" at beaches if there are 12 year olds in bikinis running around.

    "Oh dear, I can almost see their you-know-whats!"
    Why do you assume that OP goes to beaches?
  • filmoretfilmoret Palm Bay, FLMember EpicPosts: 4,906
    filmoret said:
    I believe there is a difference between making a cute little girl and making it look sexual.  Then they make it worse by saying they are 100 years old.  So that is suppose to be a little  girl who is actually an adult and don't feel bad about looking at her legs.
    You shouldn't feel bad about looking at her legs, but the way your staring at them- yeah maybe you should feel bad.
    You should feel bad for thinking that little girls should be dressing like this and becoming sexual figures in a video game is apropriate.  Next you are going to say little girls wearing thongs at the beach is good for culture.  Get a grip already there is a clear difference between sexualizing something and just advertising.
    Are you onto something or just on something?
  • jesteralwaysjesteralways BangladeshMember RarePosts: 2,560
    filmoret said:
    Is that a little girl on the right with the short skirt where you can almost see her ******?  Man that is just too much sexualization of what appears to be a little girl for me.
    Be grateful you did not have to see the korean teaser. And also the NA version has "localized" a lot of armor model for ped..i mean elin race.

    Boobs are LIFE, Boobs are LOVE, Boobs are JUSTICE, Boobs are mankind's HOPES and DREAMS. People who complain about boobs have lost their humanity.

  • GdemamiGdemami Member EpicPosts: 11,283
    filmoret said:
    Is that a little girl on the right with the short skirt where you can almost see her ******?  Man that is just too much sexualization of what appears to be a little girl for me.
    Do you know how people who find look at naked child's body too much "sexualized" are called.....?

  • VrikaVrika FinlandMember EpicPosts: 5,256
    edited May 2016
    filmoret said:
    Vrika said:
    It's cultural thing.

    One could also say that's its the Americans who are sick for worrying whether a child's pussy shows or not, when you know that the game has graphics about that child killing others and being killed by others.
    Any culture that doesn't care about little girls private parts is sick and demented.  Nice defensive stance there.  You really are on the wrong side right now.
    I care more about violence than I care about nudity.
    Post edited by Vrika on
     
  • jesteralwaysjesteralways BangladeshMember RarePosts: 2,560
    filmoret said:
    filmoret said:
    I believe there is a difference between making a cute little girl and making it look sexual.  Then they make it worse by saying they are 100 years old.  So that is suppose to be a little  girl who is actually an adult and don't feel bad about looking at her legs.
    You shouldn't feel bad about looking at her legs, but the way your staring at them- yeah maybe you should feel bad.
    You should feel bad for thinking that little girls should be dressing like this and becoming sexual figures in a video game is apropriate.  Next you are going to say little girls wearing thongs at the beach is good for culture.  Get a grip already there is a clear difference between sexualizing something and just advertising.
    You do know that there have been thousands of 12-13 years old girls who walked on ramp with nothing but thong, right? And there are also "family" tv shows that occasionally show little kids in nothing but undergarments or in small swimming wear during beach scene or pool scene. If you wanna start complaining, then start with these mainstream entertainment media.

    Boobs are LIFE, Boobs are LOVE, Boobs are JUSTICE, Boobs are mankind's HOPES and DREAMS. People who complain about boobs have lost their humanity.

  • filmoretfilmoret Palm Bay, FLMember EpicPosts: 4,906
    So I read the big controversy over that Race and yes they were very sexualized in the Korean version.  Then instead of making them cute they just undersexualized them so they would be accepted.  My question is this.  If they weren't aiming for sex with this child race then why was it such a big deal to cover them up and make them cute?  If they were aiming to be cute and realized hey Americans don't think this is cute lets cover them up and make them cute.  No they said lets just make them less sexual but without absolutely taking it all away.  Man this really is one sick culture to think this is acceptable.
    Are you onto something or just on something?
  • AlbatroesAlbatroes Member EpicPosts: 5,602
    edited May 2016
    Costumes for elins in this game appear to be a pedo's dream, so I'd be a little concerned on who makes the game versus who plays it lol
    Post edited by Albatroes on
  • Adjuvant1Adjuvant1 Peoria, ILMember RarePosts: 2,100
    filmoret said:
    filmoret said:
    I believe there is a difference between making a cute little girl and making it look sexual.  Then they make it worse by saying they are 100 years old.  So that is suppose to be a little  girl who is actually an adult and don't feel bad about looking at her legs.
    You shouldn't feel bad about looking at her legs, but the way your staring at them- yeah maybe you should feel bad.
    You should feel bad for thinking that little girls should be dressing like this and becoming sexual figures in a video game is apropriate.  Next you are going to say little girls wearing thongs at the beach is good for culture.  Get a grip already there is a clear difference between sexualizing something and just advertising.
    I agree with you and I think Holdenhamlet is being a little hard on you for the observation. I just don't see enough anthropomorphism, because humans, when their eyes are that disproportionate, don't have super skinny legs and arms. I think you're right that it is an artistically sexualized youthful depiction, but to me it looks "alien".

    People are compelled (or aroused) by weird things. This is probably on the edge of deviant, but not crossing over.
  • GdemamiGdemami Member EpicPosts: 11,283
    filmoret said:
    Next you are going to say little girls wearing thongs at the beach is good for culture.
    How are girls being comfortable to wear whatever they want, thongs included, not good for the culture?

  • jesteralwaysjesteralways BangladeshMember RarePosts: 2,560
    filmoret said:
    So I read the big controversy over that Race and yes they were very sexualized in the Korean version.  Then instead of making them cute they just undersexualized them so they would be accepted.  My question is this.  If they weren't aiming for sex with this child race then why was it such a big deal to cover them up and make them cute?  If they were aiming to be cute and realized hey Americans don't think this is cute lets cover them up and make them cute.  No they said lets just make them less sexual but without absolutely taking it all away.  Man this really is one sick culture to think this is acceptable.
    I agree that this sick, just as i also think gnome, goblin, small elf races, pixies/faeries are also sexualized and delivered toward pedophiles.

    Boobs are LIFE, Boobs are LOVE, Boobs are JUSTICE, Boobs are mankind's HOPES and DREAMS. People who complain about boobs have lost their humanity.

  • XarkoXarko Member RarePosts: 973
    OP, just ease on the shitposting for one day and let people wear what they want.
  • AoriAori Carbondale, ILMember EpicPosts: 4,071
    filmoret said:
    So I read the big controversy over that Race and yes they were very sexualized in the Korean version.  Then instead of making them cute they just undersexualized them so they would be accepted.  My question is this.  If they weren't aiming for sex with this child race then why was it such a big deal to cover them up and make them cute?  If they were aiming to be cute and realized hey Americans don't think this is cute lets cover them up and make them cute.  No they said lets just make them less sexual but without absolutely taking it all away.  Man this really is one sick culture to think this is acceptable.
    I agree that this sick, just as i also think gnome, goblin, small elf races, pixies/faeries are also sexualized and delivered toward pedophiles.
    ...was this sarcasm? Please be sarcasm.
  • filmoretfilmoret Palm Bay, FLMember EpicPosts: 4,906
    filmoret said:
    filmoret said:
    I believe there is a difference between making a cute little girl and making it look sexual.  Then they make it worse by saying they are 100 years old.  So that is suppose to be a little  girl who is actually an adult and don't feel bad about looking at her legs.
    You shouldn't feel bad about looking at her legs, but the way your staring at them- yeah maybe you should feel bad.
    You should feel bad for thinking that little girls should be dressing like this and becoming sexual figures in a video game is apropriate.  Next you are going to say little girls wearing thongs at the beach is good for culture.  Get a grip already there is a clear difference between sexualizing something and just advertising.
    You do know that there have been thousands of 12-13 years old girls who walked on ramp with nothing but thong, right? And there are also "family" tv shows that occasionally show little kids in nothing but undergarments or in small swimming wear during beach scene or pool scene. If you wanna start complaining, then start with these mainstream entertainment media.
    I have never seen a 13 year old wear a thong on television.  But if what you said is true that takes one sick parent to allow such a thing.  Just to be clear there is a difference between someone wearing a bikini and someone being sexualized in a bikini.  Little girls in a bikini are cute.  Little girls wearing butt implants or breast implants in a bikini is sexualization.  Now I'm not talking about string bikinis because their entire purpose is to sexualize.
    Are you onto something or just on something?
  • holdenhamletholdenhamlet Member EpicPosts: 3,756
    filmoret said:
    filmoret said:
    filmoret said:
    I believe there is a difference between making a cute little girl and making it look sexual.  Then they make it worse by saying they are 100 years old.  So that is suppose to be a little  girl who is actually an adult and don't feel bad about looking at her legs.
    You shouldn't feel bad about looking at her legs, but the way your staring at them- yeah maybe you should feel bad.
    You should feel bad for thinking that little girls should be dressing like this and becoming sexual figures in a video game is apropriate.  Next you are going to say little girls wearing thongs at the beach is good for culture.  Get a grip already there is a clear difference between sexualizing something and just advertising.
    You do know that there have been thousands of 12-13 years old girls who walked on ramp with nothing but thong, right? And there are also "family" tv shows that occasionally show little kids in nothing but undergarments or in small swimming wear during beach scene or pool scene. If you wanna start complaining, then start with these mainstream entertainment media.
    I have never seen a 13 year old wear a thong on television.  But if what you said is true that takes one sick parent to allow such a thing.  Just to be clear there is a difference between someone wearing a bikini and someone being sexualized in a bikini.  Little girls in a bikini are cute.  Little girls wearing butt implants or breast implants in a bikini is sexualization.  Now I'm not talking about string bikinis because their entire purpose is to sexualize.
    You can't tell what kind of underwear the Elin is wearing in the picture.

    It's you that's imagining she's wearing nothing at all.

    Think about that.
This discussion has been closed.