It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Of course .. in fact, it is going to be more precisely than "popular gaming media".coretex666 said:Everyone knows how this one would go.
Someone would say "but..but Destiny 2 is not an MMORPG " to which he would reply "not according to the popular gaming media and also there is no definition of an MMORPG".
Of course they said that. Did you see them, or any other AAA western dev, jumping back into AAA MMORPG development?Loke666 said:What they said was that Titan just wasn't as fun as they thought it would be so they reused parts that was fun into something else.nariusseldon said:Not all of them. Clearly Blizz killed Titan and made Overwatch precisely because there is no point for a new AAA MMORPG.
That does not mean there is no point in AAA MMORPGs, just that there is no point making Titan.
well .. in that case, are you saying Overwatch, an instanced shooter, has a virtual world? If so, let's just call it a MMO. Be careful, some here may not like that.iixviiiix said:LOL! , you have understand that virtual wasn't just mean npc runaround chit chat doing silly stuff like you .nariusseldon said:What do you mean by "just me"? There are 10s of millions playing Overwatch, MOBAs, and games like that.
Don't tell me you think there are virtual worlds in those games. LoL!
You obviously have not played Planetside 2 with a large number of players in the same area. But hey .. popularity is more important than technology. Technology can always be done with enough money thrown at it. Without the demand, there is no money to be thrown at anything.laserit said:
Anyways, My point to dear old nari is that the development of true MMORPGs are just as much stalled and stifled by current technology as much or more so then they are by popularity.
You have a graphics card that sucks. Don't blame others.laserit said:
Last time I played WoW with two or three hundred people in the immediate area it was a slide show.