It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
I don't think you know what the word "fact" means.Rhoklaw said:Stating facts? You are taking other people's opinions and claiming them to be facts.
well, i guess when you do not have the facts on your side, you have to resort to personal attacks. I understand.Maurgrim said:I give up, you are that kind of person who always have to be right in everything.
cameltosis said:It is why he always uses this sites games list when engaging in discussions about the definition of MMO, whilst ignoring:
He is only out to troll and deliberately uses flawed evidence.
- The English language
- The games that defined the genre
- The definitions given by the founding fathers of the genre (Garriott and Koster)
- This websites editor stating the games list was flawed
KalebGrayson said:Honestly, there doesn't appear to be anything good on the horizon. I can't understand why so many games are "sandbox" or pvp focused. Am I the only one that sees these games as not appealing? I mean seriously, I can't be the only one, right? I scan these games and think, sandbox, nope not interested, ffa pvp, nope not interested, action combat, nope not interested. I mean as soon as I read that I swipe left. How do these developers not see it? If any of these styles worked, it'd already be a big hit. I just don't get it... /smh Seriously, we need to stop waiting for the next big thing and try to appreciate what we have. Appreciate what you enjoy playing. /end rant.