Last Active
Favorite Role
  • Razer Hammerhead Wireless Headphones Review a Editorials at

    Gdemami said:
    DMKano said:
    Listen to these

    And then come back and tell me they don't sound better.
    No need to. Surround headphones is nonse.

    The reason stims from how does sound location work. The brain percieve a direction of incoming sound mainly due time and frequency differences betwen each our ear. That means the surround sound happens at audio processor, how well the sound is generated then is a matter of driver and mostly a shell/housing and the frame the driver is placed in and in that regard, single driver headphones produce superior sound quality.

    Number of drivers is a non-factor when it comes to headphones since it cannot contribute to sound location in any meaningful way.

    Number of drivers has a significant factor in manipulating inaugural level and time difference. Single driver will output the sound, but it will do so in an almost analog manner. Considering the output directly from a sound card is not analog but instead pulse code and direct stream digital, the multiple drivers allow this process to be paralleled and thus working as intended in inaugural differences. Single driver would not and would instead take the virtual output and sound like 2.1.

    You can't just take any signal and make it virtual surround either, you either have to record it with directional mics in a 7.1 plus setting, or be recorded from the get go in surround.

    Listening to shitty pop music that isn't recorded and produced for surround I think is your problem bud. Go pick up a DVD audio album in multichannel for example and compare it to it's stereo CD version, you will absolutely be able to tell the difference. If the recording is garbage, obviously virtual surround is not going to improve that.  
  • This looks like a repeat of Greedmonger sprinkled with StarCitizen.

    I can't speak for, against, or about Ashes of Creation -- I know absolutely nothing about it.

    But I do have to ask. Why they hell is there so much hatred towards independent fundraising? It's been proven effective and you don't have to stand in line to prove to an investor anything that is going to be skeptical and likely not interested in even the subject matter. 

    This couldn't be proven true or false, but mega corporation develops game that sucks but got these investors and no one complains and that company still makes millions/billions. And independent company/team raises a mil just to develop something and everyone freaks out. The difference still is that the fund raised can turn out to be a better game and the artists can get their message across, unlike the bureaucracy game company that is literally only after your money. Sure, it may end up just as bad as the mega corp games, but there isn't some jackass breathing down their neck.  
  • First!

    I don't know, I think it works perfectly. Just gave an example. And got one. 
    Can't WTF myself though. So sad. 
  • First!

    The lack of English comprehension is strong with these ones...

    Agreeing or disagreeing is the basis of an argument. Or what the younguns these days call "conversation." Not the same thing. Difference is in definition two of argument. An argument is formal, a conversation is not. An argument between multiple parties is called a convention. 

    1. 1.
      an exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one.
      "I've had an argument with my father"
    2. 2.
      a reason or set of reasons given with the aim of persuading others that an action or idea is right or wrong.

      1. the informal exchange of ideas by spoken words.
        "the two men were deep in conversation"