It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Like I said, nothing worthwhile to say so far. But I'll keep reading. You might surprise me.Oh this suddenly turned into 'I know you are but what am I' that's about as far as I figured a CNN slurp junkie cringe hole would be able to get into the discussion. Won the thread 1+ pages ago, deal with it swine.You've won nothing, and until you address the actual issue that's what's your opinions are worth: nothing.I already won the thread. No idea what you're on about son.Okay, so I guess you don't want to contribute anything worthwhile to the discussion. Noted.It doesn't look like you've quite figured it out yet so I'll give you a little heads up here, the internet is where your castrated shit pushed in leftist ideology goes to die, unless you're on facebook or twitter or some lame shit like that. Get used to it babygirl.
You've won nothing, and until you address the actual issue that's what your opinions are worth: nothing.I already won the thread. No idea what you're on about son.Okay, so I guess you don't want to contribute anything worthwhile to the discussion. Noted.It doesn't look like you've quite figured it out yet so I'll give you a little heads up here, the internet is where your castrated shit pushed in leftist ideology goes to die, unless you're on facebook or twitter or some lame shit like that. Get used to it babygirl.
And yet rather than address his very good point, "how Comcast/Verizon/AT&T and other ISPs are going to self police themselves with the help of a former Verizon attorney running the FCC", you chose to try to derail the discussion in typical, fox-news-like fashion. So, care to take a crack at it now?Starting a thread doesn't mean you get to dictate the terms of it lad, if you think so you're welcome to fuck off back to your safe space. If you're ignoring the fact that the current presidential administration is the cause of this and also the reasons why they're doing it, and also the vastly more awful things that could've happened to freedom of speech on the internet had your demented cackling hag been somehow elected to office, then you've really missed the whole context and you're just peddling in conspiracy theories that carry no real weight.FlyByKnight said:I'm not sure if you're in character or not but whatever it is you're trying to present is pretty dimwitted and daft. You've said some pretty grade A embarrassingly silly s#!% in this thread and were too slow or distracted to realize when someone is replying to the foolishness sarcastically.still haven't seen an argument, just insults. Keep trying though. Maybe give me another LOL? Or a WTF? Thanks for that Waiting to get that next MMORPG.com rank.MrMelGibson said:Calling you out is not being triggered. Also calling a spade a spade is not name calling. Nice try though. I'm sure "snowflake" is the next buzz word you'll reply with.triggered.MrMelGibson said:"Dunno what net neutrality or whatever its called even is. dont care either. "in regards to the quote "Fringe sites and online media outlets were catastrophic to her campaign"...Well that's exactly what the Obama administration would have liked to have done towards the latter part of this past election cycle. Hillary even hinted at it, wanting to shut down Breitbart 4Chan and others. Fringe sites and online media outlets were catastrophic to her campaign. Had she been elected it would've went in the opposite direction and existing policy expanded on to enable the government to make it as difficult as possible for people who operate sites like these. Trump takes the position to do away with as much big government regulations as he can get away with, across the board. He isn't targeting net neutrality specifically.Cleffy said:I don't mind the censorship private companies engage in. I do mind when the federal government censors content.
This whole manufactured outrage about what ISP's can theoretically do now is just pissing in the wind. The vast majority of Americans are against the theoretical evil ISP's 'might' do if they aren't governed. And since their main concern is offering a palatable product that is deterrent enough against doing it. There is nothing to deter big government from infringing on your rights though, any time they take a step back, it's a step in the right direction.
in before "but muh russia narrative" for hillary losing...pretty much nothing big or important came out of that lol.
In california, I saw TONS of bernie bumper stickers and over the election period saw a total of 3 hillary bumper stickers. That had nothing to do with Russia lol, people just didn't like hillary. Bernie would have had a much higher chance of winning as he had much higher support
I guess people forgot what the internet was like before obama's regulations. Making a big nothing burger out of removing regulations.
Read more at http://forums.mmorpg.com/discussion/469937/so-where-are-you-on-net-neutrality/p8#zkgtyLpzVoWLGluR.99
You literally just said this on page 8 and now you're an expert on the topic? I'm guessing you heard something "Obama or Hillary" and started foaming at the mouth. Typical right winger.
Also, resulting to insults and unable to properly argue back.
This is you. "I'm completely ignorant to the topic, but I'll give my expert advice because Hillary's emails" lol.
Outside of you specifically, I pretty much begged everybody to not invoke people who aren't in office or Covfefe for that matter and focus more on Ajit Pai who is directly responsible.
Typical fashion some red hat yahoo enters the thread invoking Obama and Hillary, then shouts "triggered" or starts playing victim when they rightfully get clowned.
Idealogues aren't salvageable, they rightfully get slapped in the face and chased back to their corners. This isn't possible on a forum so how about we all stay on how Comcast/Verizon/AT&T and other ISPs are going to self police themselves with the help of a former Verizon attorney running the FCC.
Also lol at the leftist scum posturing. The only people getting clowned here are tryhards like yourself who don't have an actual response to the reasoning so have to plead (oh you said beg) for others not to take the conversation down a path that is damning to your position because you don't have a response nor skin thick enough to handle it. Do sit down lightweight before you hurt yourself.
The only thing not salvageable here is your self respect after I just shit all over your mewling punchless rhetoric so hard. Do fuck off you sawed off little cunt.
Obviously, the government. Politicians do eventually cave if enough of their constituency assures them that they will not get their vote unless said action is taken. But if the only two ISPs in your area are Comcast and AT&T, and they're both fucking you with their fastlane bullshit or whatever other throttling scheme they come up with, what are your options? You basically have the option of having internet service while getting sodomized by one of those two or not having internet service. And there's nothing you can do about it ... except, of course, appeal to the only entity capable of stopping them ... and who could that be? Oh my, it's that evil government!FlyByKnight said:I would love for everyone to honestly answer a simple question. An abridged response please.
Who do you think American tax payers have a better chance of influencing when there is something incorrect or unfair? The government or a billion dollar ISP?
Please think before you answer because the name calling and insult portion of this conversation follows shortly after.