It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
I call a bit of bullshit on this, it also depends on the software you use for streaming. Both brands (nVidia and AMD(ATI)) have now highly efficient solutions for streaming. The processor isn't really a factor anymore.Phry said:Gamers Nexus did a test of those processors, and while it is true that the R7 handles streaming while gaming better than the 7700K, if your not streaming, then the 7700k performs far better than the R7 does, i suspect most gamers don't actually stream while playing, but for those that do, then the R7 does seem to be a more appropriate choice.Cleffy said:It's about time. One thing we saw recently with the Ryzen CPUs is the Core i7 7700K falling on its face compared to the R7 1700 when doing a stream and playing a game. Even though it is niche, the Core i7 should be the CPU that meets this niche.
A well designed 6 core architecture could be good for particular workloads. The Phenom II x6 was the last time that AMD had a competitive CPU outside of 1 workload. If they kept the chip and kept die shrinking it with a modern platform, then it would have been a stable contender.
Having a 6-core mainstream CPU means the industry can finally move forward from 4 cores after a decade.
"master" isn't the word I'd use...nerovergil said:lol.. broken so what...i master 10 language..at least i understandPemmin said:ok
i don't really understand your purpose in posting this thread because your English seems a little broken. if you are inferring that community is the most important aspect of an mmorpg....then i agree with you and others may or may not.
I don't totally agree with that.Distopia said:No the company was smart, as it was obvious neither idea was going anywhere. You're blaming a new company under new management for bleeding out it's problematic waste, Smed included. DBG hasn't done anything development related to say one way or the other how it would fare.Nilden said:Am I taking crazy pills again?
Did people not see what happened with EQNext and Landmark?
They cancelled EQNext with no refunds and put Landmark on steam only to shut it down. That happened, right?
I'd link to a youtube video of them adding stuff to the cash shop in Landmark but they deleted all the videos from both Landmark and EQNext channels.
This company is garbage you would be better off with some volunteer emulator team.
Also if Pantheon is able to incorporate some of the better design elements from VG (like classes) it will be better for it.
That said I also think Pantheon will be better than Vanguard. Since they have that experience to pull from.