It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Complete falsehood, I can't say I'm surprised though, as this is a typical response from you. You seem to be just as trollish as anyone else, you're always out and about trolling those you would label trolls to try to delegitimize their truths about your game. I have never been banned from your forums. One need only look to see. Although, I'm sure you're petty enough to do so as you can't take criticism well and seem to have a child like enjoyment of trying to quiet people when you don't like what they have to say. Much like a child that can't get another to play their way, so they take their ball and go home... You seem incapable of taking criticism of the poor mechanic decisions of the game that involve your making. I also don't post every week here about your game. All people here are doing is telling people our experience with Sota. If your game was booming and had people actually playing it, you probably wouldn't be so bothered by negative feedback and posts about how terrible it is.catnipgames said:@Voidfarer, Welcome to MMORPG, land of the completely unmoderated forums where the same half dozen trolls who were banished from the forums years ago trash the game each week! Same guys every time. Look at Ice-Queen's message history.
Not all of us are like that. The game itself looks fine and plays well for me, but I don't really mind not having top notch graphics if the gameplay is good in an mmorpg. Does it have AAA graphics? No, but I never expected it would. The gameplay isn't very good atm, true, it needs a lot of work, and there's not a lot of content yet to keep one busy. It is still in Pre-Alpha, as it says on the steam page for the game.Aragon100 said:Originally posted by grimgryphonOriginally posted by Dullahan
Lot of trolling up in here. Graphics look great for sota, and if the trolls were serious they'd surely supply screenshots or at least reference to ANY game 10 years old that looked even close to as good. About 7 years ago Vanguard was considered the most detailed and amazing graphics for an MMO and even they weren't as good. Aside from maybe the newest Final Fantasy mmo, I can think of no other better quality graphics and this is putting all art opinion aside.
So lets see some screenshots of better 10+ year old games. I await your swift replies.
Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't make it trolling. I smell a defensive $11K backer here...
Of course, if you run back to your little love-fest over on the SotA forums, you won't have to deal with "trolls". The mods over there have done a great job of creating a nice little gated community for the handful of people who still care about this game.
I feel for the ones that put thousands of $ into this game.
Graphics is bad and not comparable with games of today standards but to me gameplay have always been more important, just sad that gameplay as combat sucks even more then graphics.
I can understand that if you put thousands of dollars into this game (unseen and in blind faith of the developers) desperation might arrive that i made a poor investment and a thread like this was created to defend this poor investment.
There is pvp in the game right now, you need to flag yourself in order to pvp though. The way it's set up, if you want to pvp just flag yourself and go looking for other pvp'ers. No one is forced to pvp if they don't want to. If you're looking for something like Pre-Trammel UO, it's not like that at all. As someone said above, they learned their lesson from UO, when it cost them customers. If you're looking for a free for all, kill all the noobs, you won't get that in SotA. There are pvp zones in the game that are entirely pvp, but they're barren wastelands right now. There's a handful of people at the moment that run pvp events currently. So far it's not a very popular aspect of the game, I rarely see anyone pvp flag except the handful of same people running about. They do have more plans for pvp before and after release though.