It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Short version:filmoret said:Like I said I didn't follow on what exactly happened. But from this OP alone it looks like someone lied to defame the product and they were getting sued for it.MightyUnclean said:filmoret said:I'm not entirely sure what happened. But noone has the right to flat out lie about someone else. Its called "Libel" and its illegal. Opinions are not subject to Libel but if someone just tells a lie then it definitely is Libel and yes you should get in trouble for it.
Good Lord, are you actually supporting these guys?
Niantic did plan the event with network providers and some of them also brought additional bandwidth for the event:ianicus said:Considering they (niantic) have no control over the wireless data network, wouldn't matter if they had...I find it HIGHLY unlikely the mobile providers would bring in additional temporary data capacity for a one day event. Suits got about as much traction as molasses running uphill.Thane said:wait wait wait, they made an organized event, sold tickets, and then didn't concider the growth of netusage in that area?
Moon's rotation around its own axis and rotation around Earth both take same amount of time, and as a result same side of the Moon is always visible from Earth.They DO work all the time.spankybus said:Yes, they literally work...half the time? Was I being too generous? :-)You DO know that solar panels on the dark side of the moon are fully functional, do you not?
Just because WE cannot see that side does not stop the sun shining on it most of the time ;-)
If the sun does not shine, they get a lot of reflected light from Earth.
You can also place them in a crater near the pole on the dark side. 100 % illumination.
Like SQ42 ... do it the smart way ... and it works. 100 % of the time. At optimal performance. Even if it takes some time to get there. Like the solar panels on the lunar poles on the rim of a dark side crater.
Even if they would share some estimated date, it would mean nothing.Kyleran said:I doubt they'll provide a target delivery date in December.I understand it will be announced in Decemberrpmcmurphy said:In many ways it's a surprisingly reserved statement about Squadron 42.
Where does this put the release date?
--> "....and share our roadmap for its completion."
Yes, quite a reserved statement. That is why I think this sounds more like Erin Roberts, not Chris Roberts. Has a factual, realistic undertone, less of an exuberant tone.
Sharing the roadmap to completion sounds more like a list of outstanding features and tasks and the order they'll be worked on.
Perhaps I've been jaded by CUs endless map to beta with no actual dates.
I guess we'll find out soon.