It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
sgel said:....is kind of deceitful when every time he goes on camera he says that everything will be possible if we continue "supporting" CIG.
Erillion said:Oh Max, let them play.MaxBacon said:IF it even happens. People need to stop taking a dev mentioning something once as confirmed stuff that will happen, especially stuff that will be influenced if the community feedback is heavily against it.
They want to make a multi page thread out of a 2 second offhand side note in a 40 minute video. Ignoring everything else. Not discussing any of the other gameplay issues presented. So be it.
These guys are living in cuckoo land.
DKLond said:I don't know how many times CIG have to explain that the server can't provide better performance for the clients until they implement the new netcode they've been working on for a very long time.
Originally, most of that was supposed to be in 3.0 - but it was postponed for 3.1 I believe.
Meaning, even if there's going to be SOME performance improvement in 3.0 (LIVE version) - it won't be until 3.1 that we're going to see how the planned netcode integration will improve the performance.
Also, it won't be until they have a solid frame-rate that they expand the player count.
This, too, has been made public several times - and yet it seems the detractors are still conveniently forgetting and pretending that this early Evocati build is, somehow, representative of the best CIG can do.
It's the same old bullshit