Makes me wonder: if the game was released 5 years ago and for some reason the developers wanted to "make fun" of the previous president, what would they have had to do? The NPC would have had to speak like a cohesive, rational and well educated man.
Phineas Drumplemouth instead talks like a deranged, illiterate and self-centered man. What stands out to me is that, even without any actual reference, just by the way he talks, it seems so obvious that he's inspired by Trump.
The conversation part is intriguing, I wonder though what kind of benefits we get from chosing one path or antoher. I hope that players will be free to chose the dialogue option that fits their character's lore, instead of feeling compelled to look on some external database to get the "best reward".
I did miss something from the previous posts. What do players actually ask to be refunded for? Subscription, cash shop items, box price? Also, assuming that this whole thing escalates into a class action against them, isn't the term "P2W" too open to interpretation in a court of law to expect any results?
Funny how there seems to be no game around, openly labelled as pay-to-win. Every time a game is under scrutiny for bordering the p2w area, someone always finds the silver-lining: "Relax folks, this LOOKS like p2w, but let me explain to you why it isn't."
Really glad that this Star Wars is not pay to win, too bad it is EA otherwise I would have tried it...