Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Radeon R9 290X Benchmarks are in

CabalocCabaloc Fort Pierce, FLMember Posts: 116

Not to shabby, now lets see a official price and were good to go .

 

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-radeon-r9-290x-benchmark-performance,24732.html

 

Comments

  • VrikaVrika FinlandMember Posts: 3,450 Rare

    Those benchmarks are done using games and settings chosen by AMD. They're worthless.

  • ArglebargleArglebargle Austin, TXMember Posts: 1,886 Uncommon
    They should be viewed as best-case scenarios then.....

    If you are holding out for the perfect game, the only game you play will be the waiting one.

  • RidelynnRidelynn Fresno, CAMember Posts: 5,178 Rare

    There was one posted on Amazon for $715 US, it wasn't available yet (shocker).

    http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00FXLMMK2/?tag=hardfocom-20p

    That in and of itself doesn't mean much though.

  • CabalocCabaloc Fort Pierce, FLMember Posts: 116
    Originally posted by Vrika
    Those benchmarks are done using games and settings chosen by AMD. They're worthless.

    I didn't catch that, good call .

  • XthosXthos Columbus, OHMember Posts: 2,628 Uncommon

    Yeah, only 2 games, and only at one specific resolution...Kind of pointless.  Guess you need to be one of the first with some kind of news, but it doesn't answer much overall.

     

  • ClassicstarClassicstar rotjeknorMember Posts: 2,661 Uncommon


    Originally posted by Cabaloc
    Not to shabby, now lets see a official price and were good to go . http://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-radeon-r9-290x-benchmark-performance,24732.html 

    Worthless benchmarks and who play games on 4k resolution tell me?

    And this indeed is set up by AMD themselfs lol.

    19xx is still the avarage and i want guru3d or anandtech making bench not toms lol there amateurs.

    And if btw the 290x is only bit faster then 780 and cost almost same i wont buy it.

    If 290x is slightly slower or even with titan and price is around 500 euros i'll buy.

    MB:Asus V De Luxe z77
    CPU:Intell Icore7 3770k
    GPU: AMD Fury X(waiting for BIG VEGA 11 HBM2)
    MEMORY:Corsair PLAT.DDR3 1866MHZ 16GB
    PSU:Corsair AX1200i
    OS:Windows 10 64bit

  • RidelynnRidelynn Fresno, CAMember Posts: 5,178 Rare


    Originally posted by ClassicstarWorthless benchmarks and who play games on 4k resolution tell me?And this indeed is set up by AMD themselfs lol.19xx is still the avarage and i want guru3d or anandtech making bench not toms lol there amateurs.And if btw the 290x is only bit faster then 780 and cost almost same i wont buy it.If 290x is slightly slower or even with titan and price is around 500 euros i'll buy.

    First off, I agree it's a mostly useless benchmark. Two games that have always heavily favored GCN over Kepler doesn't tell us much.

    Second - 19xx is "the standard"; however, if a 270x can drive pretty much every game already at 19xx at 60FPS+, then what good does it do testing your faster video card at the same resolution? You get a point of reference as to how much faster, but if basically every mid-upper tier video card out there can provide "good enough" performance, it only makes sense to test it under conditions where you really can stress it and pull some separation from CPU bottlenecks. For top tier video cards, that's usually multi-monitor and extremely high resolutions; so I agree with 4k being the testing standard. It's the only way you can stress these top tier cards enough to really see what they can do.

    Third - I think you hit on the most important point. It doesn't really matter what the 290x's performance is in a vacuum, it's the price-performance ratio that counts, and how that stacks up to what else is available. It doesn't really matter if it's faster than 780 or Titan, what matters is how much that performance costs and how that compares to the 780/Titan.

Sign In or Register to comment.