It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
If the game was sub based I would far more likely play a game that actually tried to give players interesting pve content,even if the pvp was limited rather than a game that wanted you to pay them $180 a year but only offered a bigger pvp playzone but no pve content.
So the answer is yes, if the pve content looked good to me I would.
Wanna try SWToR? Or have not played in a few months. Please click my refer a friend link below and you get rewards as well.
Originally posted by meddyck Without AvA, this would for me be a generic fantasy MMO based on an IP from other games I didn't play using mechanics I dislike (limited hotbar skills, no targeted healing). So no I wouldn't be thinking twice about it if it didn't have AvA.
Great minds think alike :-)
Originally posted by NanfoodleNice bias poll, 5 votes for yes and 1 for no. Didnt vote
Personally the only modern MMORPG trend that annoys me is the idea that MMOs need to be designed in a way to attract people who don't actually like MMOs. Which to me makes about as much sense as someone trying to figure out a way to get vegetarians to eat at their steakhouse.- FARGIN_WAR
Originally posted by AlBQuirky Originally posted by Nanfoodle Nice bias poll, 5 votes for yes and 1 for no. Didnt vote
1 yes 1 no and 1 other option. More just messes up things. Adding many options for one point of view slants the pole. Again, didnt vote.
Originally posted by Teala As long as territory is faction locked, and AvAvA is the central focus of the game, and it has classes - yeah...won't be playing - because this is not TES.
Hope you find another game but from the looks of things. This is very TES MMO. As a TES fan, I wont be missing this one.
Originally posted by NanfoodleOriginally posted by AlBQuirkyOriginally posted by NanfoodleNice bias poll, 5 votes for yes and 1 for no. Didnt vote
You see, if a person selects "No" in the poll, their PvP wants are met. No need for clarification.
If a person selects "Yes" in the poll, there are now MANY PvP options that may factor into if they play or not.
What selection would make you happy? Use the "Other" selection and explain. Or don't.
I have no interest in mmos without
A) EVE style pvp
or DAOC style PVP
I also wont buy anymore MMOs that feature
A) an endgame of sitting in a city queueing to do shit.
or never ending vertical gear tiers of progression
although is suspect this game wont have daoc style PVP.
All we know is 3 factions, it could be as shite as TSWs PVP, Theres no way it will be as good as daoc or planetside because players can guest in friends campaigns and even switch campaign, and the PVE isnt tied to a campaign. At best it will probably be GW2 style PVP - extremely average.
The only proper alternative would be siege-based open world guild FFA PvP. Minimal player inventory loot combined with durability hits and a death debuff. Grind based games don't work with full loot (Fuck you Darkfall, 8 hours of preparation for 10 minute fight).
I would, if it meant that the Developers would allocate more time to "infusing" the world with TES lore (and possibly gameplay mechanics).
Originally posted by ShakyMoOf course the single player Is pve only. How can you possibly have a single player game with pvp!I gather you will also be anti group dungeons and raids seen as those aren't in skyrim too, because its a single player frikin game!