Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Fuzzy Avatars Solved! Please re-upload your avatar if it was fuzzy!

Post your benchmark scores/video and PC spec here

2

Comments

  • mayh3mmayh3m Murray, UTPosts: 77Member Uncommon

    I5-2500K @ 4.00GHZ 

    XFX 7950 3GB OC @ 925/1400

    1920x1080 Maximum

    7090 Extremely High

    Current: GW2 & TSW & WoW
    Past: Wildstar, ESO, FFXIV, DFUW, GW2, Tera, Rift, EvE, EQ, SWG, EQII, WoW, FE, DFO, Matrix Online, WAR, FFXI, Aion, AoC, DCUO, LotRO, Xsyon, GA, Vanguard.

  • MindTriggerMindTrigger La Quinta, CAPosts: 2,596Member

    I played around with this for a while for fun.

    I have SLI GTX 670's (EVGA) that were overclocked to about 1300MHz.  My CPU (i7 3770K @ 3.50GHz ~ stock) yawned through this with only 24% CPU utilization).  

     

    Tested on:2/21/2013 11:42:59 PM

    Score:8119

    Average Framerate:69.597

    Performance:Extremely High

     -Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.

    Screen Size: 1920x1080

    Graphics Presets: Maximum

     

    The interesting thing is that I get the same score whether I turn SLI on or not. In fact on a couple runs, I lost about 100 points using SLI.  Looking at my EVGA Precision X software, I can see that when SLI is enabled, my second GPU clocks up from idle to about 1000MHz, but doesn't warm up at all.  My first card is doing all the work and adding the second card does nothing for my score with this particular benchmark.  That's not the case with other things I run.

    I can clock my cards down to stock and I still score about 7000, so there's no need to even overclock them to run this game with max settings at 1920x1080.

    More info:

     

    System:

    Windows 8 Pro 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) (9200.win8_gdr.130108-1504)

    Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz

    16335.156MB

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670(VRAM 4042 MB) 9.18.0013.1407

    A sure sign that you are in an old, dying paradigm/mindset, is when you are scared of new ideas and new technology. Don't feel bad. The world is moving on without you, and you are welcome to yell "Get Off My Lawn!" all you want while it happens. You cannot, however, stop an idea whose time has come.

  • MindTriggerMindTrigger La Quinta, CAPosts: 2,596Member

    Also, the game looks pretty damned good with the graphics maxed.  I was pleasantly surprised.

     

    A sure sign that you are in an old, dying paradigm/mindset, is when you are scared of new ideas and new technology. Don't feel bad. The world is moving on without you, and you are welcome to yell "Get Off My Lawn!" all you want while it happens. You cannot, however, stop an idea whose time has come.

  • mxishmxish aurora, ONPosts: 31Member

    i5 2500k @4.7

    GTX 680 4g FTW OC'd

     

    I'll post a screenshot in a couple hours of this but I did it on the old i7 aswell

     

    i7 920  @ 4ghz

    GTX 570 OC 1.5gb?

    1920x1080:  6825

  • rojoArcueidrojoArcueid hell, NJPosts: 6,787Member Uncommon

    Tested on: 2/22/2013 3:47:46 AM
    Score:7047
    Average Framerate:59.553
    Performance:Extremely High
     -Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.

    Screen Size: 1360x768
    Graphics Presets: Maximum

    ---------------------------------------------------

    Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
    Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 750 @ 2.67GHz
    8GB RAM
    AMD Radeon HD 6950 (VRAM 752 MB)

    My video card is 1GB, if anyone knows why it shows 752mb (everywhere, not only on this benchmark) i appreciate some light

    image
  • KajidourdenKajidourden Panama City, FLPosts: 619Member Uncommon
    VRAM is what you are ACTUALLY getting out of your card.  I dont know all the technical jargon behind it....but essentially although the GPU is 1GB, it's only actually pushing out the amount show there.  Its not just your card, every video card is like that as far as im aware.
  • EhnoahEhnoah DresdenPosts: 25Member
    Some guys post here 7k + with GTX670 dunno why GTX680 only hit 6,4k on 1080p on Maximum @ I7
  • charlespaynecharlespayne greater manchesterPosts: 365Member Common
    Anyone on here who just wrights down the score instead of posting a screenshot are probebly making it up.
  • cynical012cynical012 RipleyPosts: 2Member

    FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Exploration)
    Tested on:22/02/2013 13:59:55
    Score:6033
    Average Framerate:49.246
    Performance:Very High
     -Easily capable of running the game. Should perform exceptionally well, even at higher resolutions.

    Screen Size: 1920x1200
    Graphics Presets: Maximum

     

     

    i7 3820 @ 3.60

    16GB Ram

    HD 7950

    W7 64B

  • RalstlinRalstlin Las PalmasPosts: 234Member

    Seems like Medium config is really a good quality graphics... O_o and work on a coffe pot..

     

    this Luminous Engine seems to be so pulished... not like crystal tools..

  • MindTriggerMindTrigger La Quinta, CAPosts: 2,596Member
    Originally posted by Ehnoah
    Some guys post here 7k + with GTX670 dunno why GTX680 only hit 6,4k on 1080p on Maximum @ I7

    The benchmark is only using one GPU to its full potential, as I posted above.  At least this is the case with my SLI 670 setup.  I can (and did)  turn one of my 670s off and get the exact same score.  I verified with Precision X that it's not using my second card much, if at all.  

    It's not a hardware issue on my end, as I also verified that other games and benchmarks use both GPUs.

    In addition, stock clock speeds will get you about 7K @ 1080p on single 670, but if you overclock up to about 1300MHz, you can hit around 8K.  A decent CPU doesn't even factor into this test at all.  My i7 was only hitting 24% usage max.

    If I were you, I would get GPUZ and see what my card's lane width is too.  You should be on 16X for a single 680. Your system might be bottlenecked elsewhere too such as a slow hard drive or perhaps memory.

    EDIT:  It turns out the benchmark program does not use multi-cpu by design, according to the developers.

    A sure sign that you are in an old, dying paradigm/mindset, is when you are scared of new ideas and new technology. Don't feel bad. The world is moving on without you, and you are welcome to yell "Get Off My Lawn!" all you want while it happens. You cannot, however, stop an idea whose time has come.

  • sea.shellsea.shell SelfossPosts: 63Member

    image


    image

    Playing: EVE Online
    Wants to play: ArcheAge, Lineage Eternal: Twilight Resistance / Star Citizen / FFXIV AAR / Neverwinter

    Used to play for 5+ years: Lineage 2, Lord of the Rings Online and Ragnarok Online

    Utter disappointing MMO experience for 1 - 3 Months:
    WAR / AoC / SWTOR / RIFT / AION / STO / TSW / GW2 / GW / Vanguard / Planetside2

  • MindTriggerMindTrigger La Quinta, CAPosts: 2,596Member
    Originally posted by charlespayne
    Anyone on here who just wrights down the score instead of posting a screenshot are probebly making it up.

    What possible reason would anyone have for making up a benchmark for an MMO game?  The only person they would be lying to is themselves.  This isn't an overclocking forum, and we aren't competing for the top benchmark scores.  I didn't post a screenshot because the text log provides much more information.

    Also, faking the screenshot would take me about 5 minutes in Photoshop, if I had any interest in doing so. 

    A sure sign that you are in an old, dying paradigm/mindset, is when you are scared of new ideas and new technology. Don't feel bad. The world is moving on without you, and you are welcome to yell "Get Off My Lawn!" all you want while it happens. You cannot, however, stop an idea whose time has come.

  • QSatuQSatu WarsawPosts: 1,735Member Uncommon
    4.5k at the settings I will be playing (no character shadows for example). 3.5k with everything on max. Not too bad for a pc from almost 3 years.
  • Lazarus71Lazarus71 Celina, OHPosts: 1,025Member Uncommon

    Don't know how to put the pic sadly lol....

     

    FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Exploration)
    Tested on:2/22/2013 2:41:49 PM
    Score:5048
    Average Framerate:40.510
    Performance:Very High
     -Easily capable of running the game. Should perform exceptionally well, even at higher resolutions.

    Screen Size: 1920x1080
    Graphics Presets: Maximum
     

    System:
    Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.130104-1431)
    Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz
    8174.445MB
    AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series(VRAM 1760 MB) 8.17.0010.1169

     

    No signature, I don't have a pen

  • darkspriggandarkspriggan pompano beach, FLPosts: 20Member Common

    Score:11949
    Average Framerate:112.698
    Performance:Extremely High
     -Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.

    Screen Size: 1280x720
    Graphics Presets: Maximum

     

    -----------------

    Score:8104
    Average Framerate:69.298
    Performance:Extremely High
     -Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.

    Screen Size: 1920x1080
    Graphics Presets: Maximum

    ----------------------------------

     

    Score:7696
    Average Framerate:65.179
    Performance:Extremely High
     -Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.

    Screen Size: 1920x1200
    Graphics Presets: Maximum

     

    -----------------

    Running GTX 690

    8g RAM

    2600k@4.6ghz

     Patriot Pyro SSD

  • itsbigmikeitsbigmike Youngsville, LAPosts: 86Member

    i7-3770k @4.0 ghz  GTX680, looks like its gonna be heavily processor bound

    image

     

    twitch.tv/boonmackle

  • TealaTeala SomewherePosts: 7,430Member Uncommon

    Guess it is time for a new vid card upgrade.   Even with SLI turned on and off I got the same score.   I did get an extremely high score running at a lower resolution 1680x1050 it spit out a score of over 11k, but the native resolution of this monitor is 1920x1200...sooo.  When it was running, it seem really smooth...no hiccups or anything...what do you think?  Do I need a new card?

    image
  • Punk999Punk999 Baytown, TXPosts: 875Member Uncommon
    Originally posted by Teala

    Guess it is time for a new vid card upgrade.   Even with SLI turned on and off I got the same score.   I did get an extremely high score running at a lower resolution 1680x1050 it spit out a score of over 11k, but the native resolution of this monitor is 1920x1200...sooo.  When it was running, it seem really smooth...no hiccups or anything...what do you think?  Do I need a new card?

    If you have the money sure, but i dont think its that bad really.

    "Negaholics are people who become addicted to negativity and self-doubt, they find fault in most things and never seem to be satisfied."
    ^MMORPG.com

  • NBlitzNBlitz ZwollePosts: 1,904Member
    Originally posted by Teala

    Guess it is time for a new vid card upgrade.   Even with SLI turned on and off I got the same score.   I did get an extremely high score running at a lower resolution 1680x1050 it spit out a score of over 11k, but the native resolution of this monitor is 1920x1200...sooo.  When it was running, it seem really smooth...no hiccups or anything...what do you think?  Do I need a new card?

    ()

    I'd play the game for a month before making an upgrade decision.

  • BizkitNLBizkitNL NetherlandsPosts: 2,280Member Common

    FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Exploration)

    Tested on:2/22/2013 11:55:43 PM

    Score:7883

    Average Framerate:67.072

    Performance:Extremely High

     -Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.

     

    Screen Size: 1920x1080

    Graphics Presets: Maximum

    General

    -Improve overall graphic quality. : Enabled

    -Disable rendering of objects when not visible. (Occlusion Culling) : Disabled

    -Use low-detail models on distant objects to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled

    -Cache LOD data only when necessary. (LOD Streaming) : Disabled

    -Smooth edges. (Anti-aliasing) : Enabled

    -Increase transparent lighting quality. : Enabled

    -Grass Quality : High

    Shadows

    -Use low-detail models on shadows to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled

    -Display : All

    -Shadow Resolution : High: 2048 pixels

    -Shadow Cascading : High

    -Shadow Softening : High

    Texture Detail

    -Texture Filtering : High

    -Anisotropic Filtering : High

    Effects

    -Naturally darken the edges of the screen. (Limb Darkening) : Enabled

    -Blur the graphics around an object in motion. (Radial Blur) : Enabled

    -Effects While in Motion : Display All

    -Screen Space Ambient Occlusion : High

    -Glare : Normal

    Cinematic Cutscenes

    -Enable depth of field. : Enabled

     

    System:

    Windows 7 Professional 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.120830-0333)

    Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz

    8168.887MB

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670(VRAM 4042 MB) 9.18.0013.1090

    10
  • RoinRoin Baltimore, MDPosts: 2,927Member Uncommon
    Originally posted by Teala

    Guess it is time for a new vid card upgrade.   Even with SLI turned on and off I got the same score.   I did get an extremely high score running at a lower resolution 1680x1050 it spit out a score of over 11k, but the native resolution of this monitor is 1920x1200...sooo.  When it was running, it seem really smooth...no hiccups or anything...what do you think?  Do I need a new card?

    Benchmark doesn't make use of SLI from what I keep hearing. So might not need an upgrade.

    In War - Victory.
    In Peace - Vigilance.
    In Death - Sacrifice.

  • TybostTybost Ill, WIPosts: 419Member Uncommon
    Originally posted by Teala

    Guess it is time for a new vid card upgrade.   Even with SLI turned on and off I got the same score.   I did get an extremely high score running at a lower resolution 1680x1050 it spit out a score of over 11k, but the native resolution of this monitor is 1920x1200...sooo.  When it was running, it seem really smooth...no hiccups or anything...what do you think?  Do I need a new card?


    This benchmark does NOT have SLI enabled

     

    FX-4100 @Stock [Intending to OC to 4.0GHZ]

    "Tahiti" 7870 LE Myst Graphics Card.

    8-Gigs of Ram

     

     

     

    --- Update.~ Oc'd my Fx-4100 from 3.6/3.8 Turbo - to 4.0GHZ turbo off.

    5604 Score ._. well...at least it boosted it a bit <w< only 0.2GHZ though. so >

  • Heretic061Heretic061 Honey Brook, PAPosts: 35Member Common

     

    Intel I5 2500k @ 4.4Ghz

    ASUS P8P67 Rev. 3 Pro Motherboard

    Msi GTX 660 ti PE

    16gb DDR3 Corsair Vengence

    Intel 520 SSD 120GB / 480 GB Steam Drive

  • ScholarlyScholarly Darien, ILPosts: 2Member

    Hope to give people an idea of a year old laptop.  

    Intel i7-2670QM @ 2.2GHz, 16GB RAM, nVIDIA GTX 560M 3GB vRAM

2
Sign In or Register to comment.