It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Would hackers and trappers count as rogue subclasses if we were to expand beyond fantasy genre?
What other non-hybrid rogues aren't physically adept?
Is physical adeptness singular to rogues and warriors? If we're talking about the 4 base classes clerics, mages, rogues, warriors.
If not, is there anything that is singular to rogues and warriors and common to both?
Comments
If you look at the "stats" in games ( in common ) for example Hunters and Archers are closer to Rouges.
-Their main stat is Dex , Critical Strike
- They can set traps
-They do bleed effects on hit
-Their gear is not that important as their weapon (they are not taking much damage anyway)
where Warriors tend to have Strenght , Attack Damage and a better armor class so they can soak up more damage.
Warriors used to lack crowed control abillities as well.
The rouge class (in common) is a stupid concept IMHO in MMOs nowadays.
Rouge's main stat is Dexterity that gives them Dodge,Critical Strike,Sometimes Critical Damage as well.
In "real" rpgs dexterity could give them dodge but for Critical Hits you need to have accuracy (to hit vital points on target )
A class that has a lot more chance to avoid hits and still has a higher chance to deal double (or even more) damage is just simply unbalanced.
Don't encourage him
https://www.google.com/search?q=fundamental+similarities+between+general+rogue+and+warrior+classes%3F&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:da:official&client=firefox-a
I'm talking about rogues and warriors. Is physical adeptness their only similarity? Is it singular to them? Are all rogue archetypes physically trained?
I just want to know if being physically trained is singular to non-hybrid rogues and warriors?
How many weeks or months does this have to go on before it's no longer a "quick" question?
Anyway, the answer is the same as it has always been: there are no "general" classes, but only specific classes in specific games.
I just want to know if being physically trained is singular to non-hybrid rogues and warriors?
I knew I saw this asked somewhere else, turns out 2 other places (out of the several shown in your search).
It's other names include variations of Ishida, Ranger and a few I don't care to remember. It shows up about once a month asking the same question. Don't poke it with a stick. Don't look it in the eyes. Just leave it alone.
I just want to know if being physically trained is singular to non-hybrid rogues and warriors?