Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Fuzzy Avatars Solved! Please re-upload your avatar if it was fuzzy!

Themepark to Sandbox Transition in-game...

robert4818robert4818 Aurora, COPosts: 661Member

I've started back playing Rift again, and have just reached my Capital City (Sanctum).  While I was running around (having completed my first "major" goal.  I got to thinking.

 

I would like a Themepark game that Transitions into a Sandbox fairly early.  Now, what the game is will determine what that "fairly early" actually means.  But to me it means more than just an "extended tutorial".  But instead gives players a decent amount of time to learn the game, the systems, and the paths.  And then after completion of a major goal, they find a whole world has opened up to them that they can now explore.

In the case of Rift, I would set the reaching completion of the breadtrail that leads you to the city HQ to be the start of the Sandbox content.  This doesn't mean that quests dry up, story-lines end.  It just means that level-like progression halts, and other things start to take precedence.  You can become a Rift-hunter, a soldier in the Gaurdian/Defiant war, a trader, an explorer, etc.  But the whole world then opens up, with little to no level difference from that point on.  Instead, you have other carrots to chase.

In some other games, I would set the Sandbox starter at a different spot.

Age of Conan: Leaving newbie Island.  

Star Wars Tor: Gaining your ship. (2 planets in).

EQ2: Dunno, Probably about lvl 20 or so, when you can reach Queynos or Freeport.

 

The key here is that generally, the game stops leading you by breadcrumbs, and instead opens up.  But it does so after a decent amount of time.  Starting a new character and getting to sandbox isn't something to do at the drop of a hat, but its not an insane level of work to do.  (say 5-10 hours or so of play for a new character).

 

What do you think?

 

So long, and thanks for all the fish!

«1

Comments

  • LoktofeitLoktofeit Stone Mountain, GAPosts: 13,672Member Uncommon

    There isn't a "right" or "wrong" way to play, if you want to use a screwdriver to put nails into wood, have at it, simply don't complain when the guy next to you with the hammer is doing it much better and easier. - Allein
    "Graphics are often supplied by Engines that (some) MMORPG's are built in" - Spuffyre

  • arcanistarcanist johannesbergPosts: 163Member

    so you'll be railroadeed into grinding quests before you can actually have fun playing the game, hell no.

  • LarsaLarsa NurembergPosts: 990Member
    Originally posted by robert4818

    ...

    I would like a Themepark game that Transitions into a Sandbox fairly early. ...

    What do you think?

    Isn't that the worst of both worlds? The themeparkers complaining that the game turns into a sandbox after level XX and the sandboxers complaining that the game is a themepark until level XX?

    I'm not really sure what you want to achieve by that.

    I maintain this List of Sandbox MMORPGs. Please post or send PM for corrections and suggestions.

  • AmarantharAmaranthar OhioPosts: 2,430Member Uncommon

    I can see a benefit to quests to teach players how to play in a Sandbox world. Especially after years of MMORPGs treating players like morons.

    Once upon a time....

  • robert4818robert4818 Aurora, COPosts: 661Member
    Originally posted by Amaranthar

    I can see a benefit to quests to teach players how to play in a Sandbox world. Especially after years of MMORPGs treating players like morons.

    Its not only to teach players how to play in a sandbox.  Its really using the Themepark portion to show players more of the world, and give them ideas on how stuff interacts before setting them loose in the world.  Too many sandboxes leave players literally floundering around with nothing more than a tutorial that shows them how to control their character, or a quick here's how to "build one item" crafting tutorial.  It them sets them loose in the world, mechanically able to play the game, but at the same time, leaving them feeling like they are still completely lost.

    The T>S transition, really gives players the time to get their bearings.  It introduces them into the game world, it lets them interact with the main facets multiple times.  It gives them time to develop their charachter and abilities, and better yet, it shows them and lets them interact with many of the different primary paths that characters are liable to play once they get sandboxy.  Then once the game transitions to sandbox, they have enough experience to truly feal comfortable stepping into the wild wild world, and probably have some idea of what it is they want to do, and more importantly, how to go about accomplishing it.

    As I said in the OP, I don't consider the TP time to be an "extended Tutorial".  It seems like it in a number of ways. However, the goal isn't to teach players to play the game.  There's still a tutorial that's designed around teaching the mechanics.  The TP time is really the "Get to know you" phase of the game.

    Though keep in mind, my concept of sandbox would probably STILL be considered themepark by many of the extreme sandobx players.  (I've heard them refer to Red Dead Redemption, and GTA games as Themepark, and that would be closer to the concept of the type of sandbox I would like to play in.)

     

     

    So long, and thanks for all the fish!

  • robert4818robert4818 Aurora, COPosts: 661Member
    Originally posted by Larsa
    Originally posted by robert4818

    ...

    I would like a Themepark game that Transitions into a Sandbox fairly early. ...

    What do you think?

    Isn't that the worst of both worlds? The themeparkers complaining that the game turns into a sandbox after level XX and the sandboxers complaining that the game is a themepark until level XX?

    I'm not really sure what you want to achieve by that.

    I don't think so.  As I said, many Hard Core sandbox users call what I think of as "Sandbox" as "Themepark" SP games like the GTA series, Red Dead Redemption, Elder Scrolls, Fallout etc.  I've heard all of those referred to as Themepark.  To me, they are pretty much sandbox to me.

    This isn't a new concept, though it might be for some MMO players.  The Final Fantasy Series has been doing this for years in its game.  A good portion of the game is story-driven and linear.  Then as you play on, things get a little more open.  When you reach the point of being ready to go to the last boss, you have complete freedom, open world, lots of things to chase after.  Admittedly, the full sandbox doesn't come until around 1/2 way through or later, but it exists.

    I would argue that the problems many have with sandbox games are that often they are left feeling lost on what to do.  The tutorial teaches them how to move and fight, but they are still left feeling like a fish out of water.  The themepark introduction minimizes that feeling.  The second is the general lack of "things to do" (content) in many sand box games.  Ideally, this concept goes away in the T>S game.  The idea being that the types of "paths" that are shown to players in the Theme park portion of the game, are still available in the sandbox portion, and are still available.

    Take Rift as the example, since I was playing it.  Its generally a WoW clone to much extent of Themepark discussion.  However it introduces a number of paths that could be taken Sandbox wise.  There's Rift hunting, There's the war between factions, there's the exploration, etc.  There are many ways to take these different paths, and make them much more sandboxy instead of the linear breadcrum trail that exists in the world now.

    So long, and thanks for all the fish!

  • QuirhidQuirhid TamperePosts: 5,969Member Common

    Drastically transforming the gameplay mid-way would be a huge mistake imo. Not only people who have been playing up until that point will feel like you've butt-f***ed them, but the people who could potentially enjoy your "end-game" would never get there.

    I skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been -Wayne Gretzky

  • robert4818robert4818 Aurora, COPosts: 661Member
    Originally posted by Quirhid

    Drastically transforming the gameplay mid-way would be a huge mistake imo. Not only people who have been playing up until that point will feel like you've butt-f***ed them, but the people who could potentially enjoy your "end-game" would never get there.

    I disagree.

     

    There are a number of reasons.

    First, As I've said in an earlier post, its been done before.  There are many SRPG's that take this route.  The key is to make the gameplay shift feel natural.  We aren't going from RIFT to Ultima Online.  We are going from "Focused RIFT to Open RIFT", so to speak.

    You've not really changed the gameplay, so much as you've gone from focused story line, and transitioned into, now you have your freedom.   So, to continue using RIFT as a basis.  You've gone from following a trail of breadcrumbs that introduce you to the world, the war, the rifts, etc.  To a point where all of these things now exist, but you are now free to chase them as you feel fit.  You can explore the world, maybe set up some towns, close rifts, etc.  Only the breadcrumbs stopped at the Sanctum.  

    So long, and thanks for all the fish!

  • QuirhidQuirhid TamperePosts: 5,969Member Common
    Originally posted by robert4818
    Originally posted by Quirhid

    Drastically transforming the gameplay mid-way would be a huge mistake imo. Not only people who have been playing up until that point will feel like you've butt-f***ed them, but the people who could potentially enjoy your "end-game" would never get there.

    I disagree.

     

    There are a number of reasons.

    First, As I've said in an earlier post, its been done before.  There are many SRPG's that take this route.  The key is to make the gameplay shift feel natural.  We aren't going from RIFT to Ultima Online.  We are going from "Focused RIFT to Open RIFT", so to speak.

    You've not really changed the gameplay, so much as you've gone from focused story line, and transitioned into, now you have your freedom.   So, to continue using RIFT as a basis.  You've gone from following a trail of breadcrumbs that introduce you to the world, the war, the rifts, etc.  To a point where all of these things now exist, but you are now free to chase them as you feel fit.  You can explore the world, maybe set up some towns, close rifts, etc.  Only the breadcrumbs stopped at the Sanctum.  

    There is no "natural shift" from concentrated, condenced fun to scarce and scattered make-your-own-fun. Most people don't want sandbox. If they would, they would play one. Sneaking a sandbox in would be butt-f***ing them.

    I skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been -Wayne Gretzky

  • TheLizardbonesTheLizardbones Arkham, VAPosts: 10,910Member

    I'm not sure it's a good idea, but if anyone could combine the theme park elements of Rift with more sandbox style play, I think it's Trion. I don't think the game play would benefit from a transition though. Sandbox elements should be added, with nothing taken away.

    I can not remember winning or losing a single debate on the internet.

  • waynejr2waynejr2 West Toluca Lake, CAPosts: 4,479Member Uncommon
    Originally posted by Quirhid

    Drastically transforming the gameplay mid-way would be a huge mistake imo. Not only people who have been playing up until that point will feel like you've butt-f***ed them, but the people who could potentially enjoy your "end-game" would never get there.

    Certainly if mmorpg history holds true, it would be a bait and switch.   Look at the complaints at recent releases and those of SWG->NGE and AOC post level 20.  Playerbase would be complaining up a storm.

  • QuizzicalQuizzical Posts: 14,784Member Uncommon

    You can have a tutorial in a sandbox, but I don't think it's good to make it mandatory.  See how Uncharted Waters Online does it, for example.  There are adventuring, merchant, and maritime tutorials, with beginner, intermediate, and advanced versions of each.  A brand new player should start with the beginner tutorials, because otherwise, he'll be hopelessly lost.  But an alt for a veteran player can skip it if so inclined.  And the other tutorials are there for whenever you get around to doing them.

  • robert4818robert4818 Aurora, COPosts: 661Member
    Originally posted by Quirhid
    Originally posted by robert4818
    Originally posted by Quirhid

    Drastically transforming the gameplay mid-way would be a huge mistake imo. Not only people who have been playing up until that point will feel like you've butt-f***ed them, but the people who could potentially enjoy your "end-game" would never get there.

    I disagree.

     

    There are a number of reasons.

    First, As I've said in an earlier post, its been done before.  There are many SRPG's that take this route.  The key is to make the gameplay shift feel natural.  We aren't going from RIFT to Ultima Online.  We are going from "Focused RIFT to Open RIFT", so to speak.

    You've not really changed the gameplay, so much as you've gone from focused story line, and transitioned into, now you have your freedom.   So, to continue using RIFT as a basis.  You've gone from following a trail of breadcrumbs that introduce you to the world, the war, the rifts, etc.  To a point where all of these things now exist, but you are now free to chase them as you feel fit.  You can explore the world, maybe set up some towns, close rifts, etc.  Only the breadcrumbs stopped at the Sanctum.  

    There is no "natural shift" from concentrated, condenced fun to scarce and scattered make-your-own-fun. Most people don't want sandbox. If they would, they would play one. Sneaking a sandbox in would be butt-f***ing them.

    I'm using An existing Game as a common ground concept.  This is NOT a proposal to change an existing game.

    So, I have no idea what you mean by "Sneaking a sandbox in".  As it would be  a new game, its not like this is a "hidden" or "surprise" feature.

    So long, and thanks for all the fish!

  • mmoguy43mmoguy43 , CAPosts: 2,447Member Uncommon

    Could you be more specific to how it becomes a sandbox? How does it open up?

    By bread crumbs I assume you mean a continuous stream of quests? So it goes from a long line of quests to quests scattered around the world?

    I have a hard time imaginging how it can make the transition without already being a sandbox which instead has a lengthy guided tutorial.

  • robert4818robert4818 Aurora, COPosts: 661Member
    Originally posted by mmoguy43

    Could you be more specific to how it becomes a sandbox? How does it open up?

    By bread crumbs I assume you mean a continuous stream of quests? So it goes from a long line of quests to quests scattered around the world?

    I have a hard time imaginging how it can make the transition without already being a sandbox which instead has a lengthy guided tutorial.

    Sure.

    Your standard MMO breadcrumb trail is the Hub A quests, then the Delivery quest to Hub B, repeat through Z.  

    The way this game would work would work would be the standard breadcrumb trail until you reach the turning point.  In Rift, it would be reaching your capital city.  In FF11 it would be reaching Jueno.  Etc.  After that point, the breadcrumbs stop.  The long line of quests has reached its end.  Instead, many of the different activities you chased become something more trackable, the world more dynamic.  (For example, if you were playing rifts, the rifts start having more of an impact on the world, but you are able to combat them.  The game tracks the effects of the rifts, and the effects of closing them.

    What really shifts (beyond the breadcrumbs) is that the 1 path you had, now becomes multiple paths.  Each path has its own separate significance, not only for you, but for the game world as well.  (For example, one path might be the PVP conflict.  Where winning and losing has an effect on different aspects of the world).  

    It is possible to LOOK at the initial part as an extended tutorial, I don't.  I find it to be more of a familiarization period than a tutorial.  You've already LEARNED how to play through the "tutorial" that normally exists at the beginning.  The game isn't really TEACHING you anything, its more you are simply familiarizing yourself with the various parts of the game.

    So long, and thanks for all the fish!

  • QuirhidQuirhid TamperePosts: 5,969Member Common
    Originally posted by robert4818
    Originally posted by Quirhid
     

    I'm using An existing Game as a common ground concept.  This is NOT a proposal to change an existing game.

    So, I have no idea what you mean by "Sneaking a sandbox in".  As it would be  a new game, its not like this is a "hidden" or "surprise" feature.

    I'm not talking about changing an existing game either. I'm talking about a new game that starts out one way and transforms into something people didn't sign up for. The way you're presenting it sounds awfully like a bait and switch. You don't introduce players to sandbox with themepark. Just like you don't introduce players to PvP by applying "unsafe PvE" - for goodness sake many have tried and failed.

    If you want to make sandboxes more popular, which is the ulterior motive I'm guessing you have, you do it by making hybrid from the get-go and all the way through. Not by changing the game half-way through. Like Larsa already mentioned, you'd have sandbox players racing through the "tutorial" to get to the endgame and themepark players quitting once they reach it.

     

    EDIT: And its not only the themepark to sandbox transition but any dramatic transision in any game thats bad.

    I skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been -Wayne Gretzky

  • LarsaLarsa NurembergPosts: 990Member

    Robert, I get the impression that you don't want a transition from themepark to sandbox (if that would be possible). The more I read the more I think you only want a transition from "very rigid and linear themepark" to "a little less rigid and linear themepark".

    There's nothing wrong with that of course but sandbox it isn't.

    I maintain this List of Sandbox MMORPGs. Please post or send PM for corrections and suggestions.

  • robert4818robert4818 Aurora, COPosts: 661Member
    Originally posted by Larsa

    Robert, I get the impression that you don't want a transition from themepark to sandbox (if that would be possible). The more I read the more I think you only want a transition from "very rigid and linear themepark" to "a little less rigid and linear themepark".

    There's nothing wrong with that of course but sandbox it isn't.

    As I said, My concept of Sandbox, and some people's don't mesh well.

     

    Then again, I find that many have gone overboard on their definition of sandbox.  While GTA, Red Dead Redemption, and Elder Scroll games are described by many to be sandbox, there are many people who name these things themepark.  

    So long, and thanks for all the fish!

  • minime2minime2 cardiffPosts: 113Member
    Originally posted by Quirhid
    Originally posted by robert4818
    Originally posted by Quirhid

    Drastically transforming the gameplay mid-way would be a huge mistake imo. Not only people who have been playing up until that point will feel like you've butt-f***ed them, but the people who could potentially enjoy your "end-game" would never get there.

    I disagree.

     

    There are a number of reasons.

    First, As I've said in an earlier post, its been done before.  There are many SRPG's that take this route.  The key is to make the gameplay shift feel natural.  We aren't going from RIFT to Ultima Online.  We are going from "Focused RIFT to Open RIFT", so to speak.

    You've not really changed the gameplay, so much as you've gone from focused story line, and transitioned into, now you have your freedom.   So, to continue using RIFT as a basis.  You've gone from following a trail of breadcrumbs that introduce you to the world, the war, the rifts, etc.  To a point where all of these things now exist, but you are now free to chase them as you feel fit.  You can explore the world, maybe set up some towns, close rifts, etc.  Only the breadcrumbs stopped at the Sanctum.  

    There is no "natural shift" from concentrated, condenced fun to scarce and scattered make-your-own-fun. Most people don't want sandbox. If they would, they would play one. Sneaking a sandbox in would be butt-f***ing them.

    Your wrong SWTOR proved one thing , more people wanted sandbox than themepark .  That is why the game is now dead

     

  • keenberkeenber galwayPosts: 438Member

    I agree a short theampark exp could work but you would have to have a choice.

    What i would love to see in a game like Rift is  theampark servers and sandbox servers but that would probly be too much work

  • QuirhidQuirhid TamperePosts: 5,969Member Common
    Originally posted by minime2
    Originally posted by Quirhid

    Your wrong SWTOR proved one thing , more people wanted sandbox than themepark .  That is why the game is now dead

     

    I must secretly love sandboxes too because I didn't care for SWTOR either, huh? -No.

    The game is far from dead. Looking at MMOData.net, SWTOR is still bigger than any sandbox out there. It is the 10th most played game (among all games not just MMOs) on XFire too. Darkfall, Xsyon, Mortal Online and almost every other sandbox is dead by comparison.

    I skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been -Wayne Gretzky

  • AmarantharAmaranthar OhioPosts: 2,430Member Uncommon
    Originally posted by Quirhid
    Originally posted by minime2
    Originally posted by Quirhid

    Your wrong SWTOR proved one thing , more people wanted sandbox than themepark .  That is why the game is now dead

     

    I must secretly love sandboxes too because I didn't care for SWTOR either, huh? -No.

    The game is far from dead. Looking at MMOData.net, SWTOR is still bigger than any sandbox out there. It is the 10th most played game (among all games not just MMOs) on XFire too. Darkfall, Xsyon, Mortal Online and almost every other sandbox is dead by comparison.

    You're comparing road kill to horse sheet to the starving masses?

    Once upon a time....

  • QuirhidQuirhid TamperePosts: 5,969Member Common
    Originally posted by Amaranthar
    Originally posted by Quirhid
    Originally posted by minime2
    Originally posted by Quirhid

    Your wrong SWTOR proved one thing , more people wanted sandbox than themepark .  That is why the game is now dead

     

    I must secretly love sandboxes too because I didn't care for SWTOR either, huh? -No.

    The game is far from dead. Looking at MMOData.net, SWTOR is still bigger than any sandbox out there. It is the 10th most played game (among all games not just MMOs) on XFire too. Darkfall, Xsyon, Mortal Online and almost every other sandbox is dead by comparison.

    You're comparing road kill to horse sheet to the starving masses?

    He (minime2) did. Not me.

    I skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been -Wayne Gretzky

  • WellzyCWellzyC Stillwater, MNPosts: 557Member Uncommon

     

    Cut-scenes does not an mmo make.

    The way mmo's were: Community, Exploration, Character Development, Conquest.

    The way mmo's are now : Cut-Scenes,Cut-Scenes, solo Questing, Cut-Scenes...


    www.CeaselessGuild.com

«1
Sign In or Register to comment.