DNA Analysis of Egyptian Mummies Supports Biblical Story of Noah’s Descendants

KooturKootur Lynchburg, VAMember UncommonPosts: 135
Kind of puts to rest the afro-centric view. It seems the further back you go the more middle-eastern and more European the mummies dna gets.


https://hellochristian.com/8351-dna-of-ancient-mummies-could-prove-biblical-narrative-of-ham-son-of-noah

Researchers from the University of Tuebingen concluded that preserved remains found in Abusir-el Meleq, Middle Egypt, were close genetic relatives of Neolithic and Bronze Age populations from the Near East, Anatolia and Eastern Mediterranean Europeans, according to CNN. 

"We found the ancient Egyptian samples falling distinct from modern Egyptians, and closer towards Near Eastern and European samples," the researchers noted. "In contrast, modern Egyptians are shifted towards sub-Saharan African populations."

«1

Comments

  • Thoth_MosheThoth_Moshe Member UncommonPosts: 240
    All the DNA results are from rulers from the New Kingdom of Egypt after foreigners started taking Egypt, its in the CNN article and other recent article.  The Dynasties before these in the Old Kingdom were different and were called Kemetians of Kemet which was a so called Egypt and larger parts of Africa.  And even in the New Kingdom there were still some black royalty as I will show.  Notice in Mainstream entertainment, when its about Egypt its always about Egypt during this new kingdom and around the time when greeks like alexander the great and cleopetra in rule.

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/22/health/ancient-egypt-mummy-dna-genome-heritage/index.html

    From CNN:
    "Scientists took 166 bone samples from 151 mummies, dating from approximately 1400 B.C. to A.D. 400, extracting DNA from 90 individuals and mapping the full genome in three cases."

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2017/05/30/dna-from-ancient-egyptian-mummies-reveals-their-ancestry/?utm_term=.70eea41bddc2

    From Washigntonpost:
    "A study led by researchers at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History and the University of Tubingen in Germany managed to plug some of those genetic gaps. Researchers wrung genetic material from 151 Egyptian mummies,  radiocarbon dated between Egypt's New Kingdom (the oldest at 1388 B.C.) to the Roman Period (the youngest at 426 A.D.), as reported Tuesday in the journal Nature Communications."

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Kingdom_of_Egypt
    "The New Kingdom of Egypt, also referred to as the Egyptian Empire, is the period in ancient Egyptian history between the 16th century BC and the 11th century BC, covering the Eighteenth, Nineteenth, and Twentieth Dynasties of Egypt. Radiocarbon dating places the exact beginning of the New Kingdom between 1570 BC and 1544 BC

    The later part of this period, under the Nineteenth and Twentieth Dynasties (1292–1069 BC) is also known as the Ramesside period. It is named after the eleven pharaohs that "took" the name of Ramesses I, founder of the 19th Dynasty.

    Possibly as a result of the foreign rule of the Hyksos during the Second Intermediate Period"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyksos
    "The Hyksos (/ˈhɪksɒs/ or /ˈhɪksoʊz/;[3] Egyptian heqa khasut, "ruler(s) of the foreign countries"; Ancient Greek: Ὑκσώς, Ὑξώς) were a people of mixed origins from Western Asia,[4] who settled in the eastern Nile Delta, some time before 1650 BC. The arrival of the Hyksos led to the end of the Thirteenth Dynasty of Egypt and initiated the Second Intermediate Period of Egypt.[5] In the context of Ancient Egypt, the term "Asiatic" – which is often used for the Hyksos – may refer to any people native to areas east of Egypt."


    Now to look at the old Dynasties of what is called Kemet.

    http://www.fitzmuseum.cam.ac.uk/dept/ant/egypt/kemet/virtualkemet/faq/

    From University of Cambridge - Fitzwilliam Museum

    "Prior to Europe's involvement with Egypt, the people of Ancient Egypt had many names for their country such as 'Ta Mery' (the beloved land), 'Ta Sety' (the land of the bow) which was used for the southern most regions of the country and Nubia (see below). Another name was 'Kemet', which means 'the black land'."

    "African Centred Egyptology aims to look at Egypt as part of African culture. People mainly look at Ancient Egypt through a European bias. This is because the majority of books on Egyptology are written by researchers of European, or North-American backgrounds. There are also increasing numbers of Egyptian scholars also publishing in English as well as Arabic. However, there are comparatively few scholars of African origin or descent who work on the subject of Ancient Egypt. Their views, when African Centred, are often and wrongly dismissed by more mainstream Egyptologists."
  • Thoth_MosheThoth_Moshe Member UncommonPosts: 240
    Images of Artifacts from Old Dynasties such the 4th

    http://library.si.edu/digital-library/book/egyptianartstu00masp

    From Smithsonian:

    Menkaure, was an ancient Egyptian king of the 4th dynasty during the Old Kingdom

    Image result for mycerinusRelated image

    Sekhemka
    5th dynasty and depicts Sekhemka the scribe


    Related imageImage result for sekhemka

    Nebhepetre Mentuhotep II was a Pharaoh of the 11th Dynasty who reigned for 51 years

    Related imageImage result for montouhotep

    Senusret I, also anglicized as Sesostris I and Senwosret I, was the second pharaoh of the Twelfth Dynasty of Egypt


    Image result for senusretRelated image

    Intef was an Ancient Egyptian general of the 11th Dynasty, around 2000 BC, under king Mentuhotep II


    Image result for general antef
    Thats not a hat


    Last of the Black Royalty
    Tiye was the daughter of Yuya and Tjuyu. She became the Great Royal Wife of the Egyptian pharaoh Amenhotep III. She was the mother of Akhenaten and grandmother of Tutankhamun.
    Image result for queen tiye
    Image result for queen tiye

    Amenhotep III, also known as Amenhotep the Magnificent, was the ninth pharaoh of the Eighteenth Dynasty.
    Image result for Amenhotep III

    And notice that a lot of older statues have broken noses.  A very distinguishing feature on people.
    https://www.google.com/search?q=egyptian+statues+with+broken+noses&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj70ITukOvUAhXHoD4KHYahAv4Q_AUIBigB&biw=1536&bih=755

    Image result for egyptian statues

    Similar to broken noses of Black Figures in Europe
    Image result for black statues in europeImage result for black statues in europe

    The Older you go
    https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn23240-the-father-of-all-men-is-340000-years-old/
    https://mic.com/articles/29612/descendant-of-adam-found-in-south-carolina-why-this-could-re-write-history#.m9lre5PpI

    "A recent study has found that the common ancestor of all Y-chromosomes lived approximately 338,000 years ago, vastly surpassing previous estimates (100–140,000 years). Unlike most genetic studies, this one did not begin in a university — though it soon landed in the laboratory of Michael Hammer at the University of Arizona. Instead, it started with the customers of Family Tree DNA. Among all the samples the company tested and classified, one stood out.

    Submitted by the relatives of Albert Perry, an African-American from South Carolina, this Y-chromosome was like none seen before."
  • Thoth_MosheThoth_Moshe Member UncommonPosts: 240
    edited July 2
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyksos
    The Hyksos (/ˈhɪksɒs/ or /ˈhɪksoʊz/;[3] Egyptian heqa khasut, "ruler(s) of the foreign countries"; Ancient Greek: Ὑκσώς, Ὑξώς) were a people of mixed origins

    http://biblehub.com/hebrew/6151.htm
    arab: to mix
    Original Word: עֲרַב
    Part of Speech: Verb
    Transliteration: arab
    Phonetic Spelling: (ar-ab')
    Short Definition: combine

    If you are a mixed than you are not Original

    According to scientist the so called Africans are the only ones that are 100% Homo-Sapien



    Post edited by Thoth_Moshe on
  • KooturKootur Lynchburg, VAMember UncommonPosts: 135
    edited July 3
    That sort of afro-centric nonsense had been debunked.

    The DNA testing shows the ancient pharaohs were mostly from the Levant.

    Claiming that the ancient egypitans were negros is almost as silly as those that claim they were the original jews as well.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15694
    Post edited by Kootur on
    Thoth_Moshe
  • Thoth_MosheThoth_Moshe Member UncommonPosts: 240
    Kootur said:
    That sort of afro-centric nonsense had been debunked.

    The DNA testing shows the ancient pharaohs were mostly from the Levant.

    Claiming that the ancient egypitans were negros is almost as silly as those that claim they were the original jews as well.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15694
    Again the same thing from this article as in the other articles
    DNA is from the kings of the New Kingdom Era which is after foreigners started invading, such as the Hyksos.

    "The samples recovered from Middle Egypt span around 1,300 years of ancient Egyptian history from the New Kingdom to the Roman Period."

    You blind as hell, because all those pictures of the old kings look like so many black people I've seen in my life. They got the afros, the skull structure, lips, nose everything.
  • Thoth_MosheThoth_Moshe Member UncommonPosts: 240
    You wish you had hair like this, a natural crown
    Image result for egyptian pharaohs that look like modern people
  • Thoth_MosheThoth_Moshe Member UncommonPosts: 240
    edited July 3
    You sure those people belong there?

    http://www.haaretz.com/israel-s-skin-cancer-rate-second-highest-in-the-world-1.10250
    "The skin cancer rate in Israel is among the highest in the world, the Israel Cancer Association reported yesterday. At the end of 2000 there were 3,631 skin cancer patients in Israel and around 200 die every year from the disease."

    https://www.forbes.com/2008/07/28/skin-cancer-hotspots-forbeslife-cx_avd_0728health.html
    Australia and New Zealand have the highest incidence and mortality rates of melanoma in the world, according to Australia's Department of Health and Aging. (Guess what the aboriginal people of Australia look like)

    In a thousand years I have no doubt they will start teaching indo-Europeans are the aboriginal people of Americas because they found some DNA here.

    You cant get dominant genes from recessive genes, only the other way around.  If Noah looked like modern day Israeli's, than Black people would not exist. 

    http://www.blinn.edu/socialscience/LDThomas/Feldman/Handouts/0203hand.htm


    DOMINANT TRAITS

    RECESSIVE TRAITS

    eye coloring

    brown eyes

    grey, green, hazel, blue eyes

    vision

    farsightedness
    normal vision
    normal vision
    normal vision

    normal vision
    nearsightedness
    night blindness
    color blindness*

    hair

    dark hair
    non-red hair
    curly hair
    full head of hair
    widow's peak

    blonde, light, red hair
    red hair
    straight hair
    baldness*
    normal hairline

    facial features

    dimples
    unattached earlobes
    freckles
    broad lips


    no dimples
    attached earlobes
    no freckles
    thin lips


    appendages

    extra digits
    fused digits
    short digits
    fingers lack 1 joint
    limb dwarfing
    clubbed thumb
    double-jointedness

    normal number
    normal digits
    normal digits
    normal joints
    normal proportion
    normal thumb
    normal joints

    other

    immunity to poison ivy
    normal pigmented skin
    normal blood clotting
    normal hearing
    normal hearing and speaking
    normal- no PKU

    susceptibility to poison ivy
    albinism
    hemophilia*
    congenital deafness
    deaf mutism
    phenylketonuria (PKU)


    Post edited by Thoth_Moshe on
  • Thoth_MosheThoth_Moshe Member UncommonPosts: 240

    These same people that was ruling Egypt during those times of the new Kingdom destroying all the knowledge and history of Egypt.  Wonder why.  Keep all the useful stuff and destroy the rest then move out and leave Egypt for the dust.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria

    Arguably, this library is most famous for having been burned down resulting in the loss of many scrolls and books; its destruction has become a symbol for the loss of cultural knowledge. Sources differ on who was responsible for its destruction and when it occurred. The library may in truth have suffered several fires over many years. Possible occasions for the partial or complete destruction of the Library of Alexandria include a fire set by the army of Julius Caesar in 48 BC and an attack by Aurelian in the 270s AD.

    After the main library was destroyed, scholars used a "daughter library" in a temple known as the Serapeum, located in another part of the city. According to Socrates of Constantinople, Coptic Pope Theophilus destroyed the Serapeum in AD 391, although it is not certain what it contained or if it contained any significant fraction of the documents that were in the main library. The library may have finally been destroyed during the Muslim conquest of Egypt in (or after) AD 642.

  • Thoth_MosheThoth_Moshe Member UncommonPosts: 240
    I already posted this up above, but since you want to say stuff like "Afro-Centric"....Black people arent the ones ruling the modern world like the governments or writing the academic text books or controlling the museums, doing the DNA tests, doing the archaeological digs.  All the pictures you will find in that smithsonian website I linked above the pics of the artifacts and many other reputable sources.  For you to say something like everything is debunked is just stupid. 

    These cambridge professors said it them selves, sounds more like Euro-Centric than Afro-Centric
    http://www.fitzmuseum.cam.ac.uk/dept/ant/egypt/kemet/virtualkemet/faq/

    "African Centred Egyptology aims to look at Egypt as part of African culture. People mainly look at Ancient Egypt through a European bias."

    I'll show you the pure definition of that statement

    https://archive.org/details/speechofhenryber00berr

    by Henry Berry, Esq., in the Virginia House of Delegates, January 20, 1832:

    "Sir, we have as far as possible closed every avenue by which light may enter their [the slaves'] minds; we have only to go one step farther,--- to extinguish the capacity to see the light, and our work would be completed ; they would then be reduced to the level with the beasts of the field, and we should be safe; and I am not certain that we would not do it if we could find out the necessary process, and that under the plea of necessity..."

    - Henry Berry, Esq., himself a slaveholder, in the Virginia House of Delegates, January 20, 1832.

    If things are so afro-centric, than why is this happening
    From Health Investigator:


    And look what this woman caught in her child's school history textbook

  • KooturKootur Lynchburg, VAMember UncommonPosts: 135
    edited July 3
    Now you're just posting conspiracys.

    Science debunks plenty of the afro centric nonsense. Like the out of africa theorys.

    http://www.newsweek.com/first-hominin-europe-east-africa-human-evolution-613494
    Post edited by Kootur on
  • Thoth_MosheThoth_Moshe Member UncommonPosts: 240
    Kootur said:
    Now you're just posting conspiracys.

    Science debunks plenty of the afro centric nonsense. Like the out of africa theorys.

    http://www.newsweek.com/first-hominin-europe-east-africa-human-evolution-613494
    Do you even understand the articles you put out?  Look what it says

    "The first hominin species, a line that eventually leads to humans, may have emerged in Europe 7.2 million years ago and not Africa—the most widely accepted starting point for our ancestors."

    A "Hominin Species" can mean also mean things like Neanderthal which isnt Homo-Sapien which is what a Human is.
    (http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-fossils/species)
    And in that link look at the Neanderthal and then look at what the other species before it looked like. (Click the tab "Sort by Age")

    Nothing I have presented is a conspiracy, do you not click on the link, the quote from henry berry isnt a conspiracy.  I've been giving you science through out the thread.

    The first homo-sapiens of Europe were black (Afro-Asiatic) according to historians and scientists, how can the modern European be the first if they arent them selves 100% homo-sapien as I have shown.  Lighter skin and blonde/red hair which are recessive genes didnt come until homo-sapiens interbred with Neanderthals. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3028813/Europeans-dark-skinned-8-000-years-ago-Pale-complexions-brought-Europe-Near-East-study-claims.html




    Do you understand what recessive and dominant genes are?  You cannot get dominant genes from parents with recessive genes, its only the other way around and the Black Man is Dominant Genes.

    http://www.blinn.edu/socialscience/LDThomas/Feldman/Handouts/0203hand.htm

    DOMINANT TRAITS

    RECESSIVE TRAITS

    eye coloring

    brown eyes

    grey, green, hazel, blue eyes

    vision

    farsightedness
    normal vision
    normal vision
    normal vision

    normal vision
    nearsightedness
    night blindness
    color blindness*

    hair

    dark hair
    non-red hair
    curly hair
    full head of hair
    widow's peak

    blonde, light, red hair
    red hair
    straight hair
    baldness*
    normal hairline

    facial features

    dimples
    unattached earlobes
    freckles
    broad lips


    no dimples
    attached earlobes
    no freckles
    thin lips


    appendages

    extra digits
    fused digits
    short digits
    fingers lack 1 joint
    limb dwarfing
    clubbed thumb
    double-jointedness

    normal number
    normal digits
    normal digits
    normal joints
    normal proportion
    normal thumb
    normal joints

    other

    immunity to poison ivy
    normal pigmented skin
    normal blood clotting
    normal hearing
    normal hearing and speaking
    normal- no PKU

    susceptibility to poison ivy
    albinism
    hemophilia*
    congenital deafness
    deaf mutism
    phenylketonuria (PKU)



  • Thoth_MosheThoth_Moshe Member UncommonPosts: 240
    Is slavery a conspiracy too?
    Is genocide a conspiracy too?

    Is this a conspiracy?
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/tulsa-race-riots_us_574fc3aae4b0ed593f134a92
    http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/05/1921-black-business-district-in-tulsa-oklahoma-attacked-aerially-bombed-and-razed-victims-dumped-in-mass-graves.html

    From the PPT, CPB doc:

    May 31st, 1921, Tulsa, Oklahoma.  The ‘Negro Wall Street’ district of the Greenwood neighborhood is bombed from the air.

    Whites invade the enviable black business district, looting, burning, killing.

    The police commandeer private planes. The 101st Airborne is flown in. A load of dynamite is dropped. 75 instantly killed. Hundreds of homes and businesses destroyed.

    Four truckloads of bodies are shoveled into mass graves along the Arkansas river.

    4,000 black men, women, and children arrested and placed in concentration camps, where they are required to carry ‘passes’.

    The city quickly re-zones the neighborhood so that the railroad can be run through, thus completing the destruction of that neighborhood.

    Wikipedia states that on May 31 and June 1, 1921:

    …a group of white people attacked the black community of Tulsa, Oklahoma. It resulted in the Greenwood District, also known as ‘the Black Wall Street‘ and the wealthiest black community in the United States, being burned to the ground.

    An estimated 10,000 blacks were left homeless, and 35 city blocks composed of 1,256 residences were destroyed by fire. The official count of the dead by the Oklahoma Department of Vital Statistics was 39, but other estimates of black fatalities vary from 55 to about 300.

    The events of the riot were long omitted from local and state histories. “The Tulsa race riot of 1921 was rarely mentioned in history books, classrooms or even in private. Blacks and whites alike grew into middle age unaware of what had taken place.”

    One official, the police chief, was found guilty of “failing to take proper precautions for protecting life and property, and for conspiring to free automobile thieves and collect rewards.”

    “No legal records indicate that any other white official was ever charged of wrongdoing or even negligence.”

    Is this a Conspiracy? Did this not happen?
    Human Zoos
    Image result for human zoos

    Image result for human zoos

    Image result for human zoos

    What about this?
    Image result for alligator baitImage result for alligator baitImage result for alligator bait
  • Thoth_MosheThoth_Moshe Member UncommonPosts: 240
    Heres what National Geographic came up with their genetic analysis

  • Thoth_MosheThoth_Moshe Member UncommonPosts: 240
    Look what they use to help this girls condition


    Look whos genetics they use to treat several diseases
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henrietta_Lacks

    http://rebeccaskloot.com/the-immortal-life/

    "Her name was Henrietta Lacks, but scientists know her as HeLa. She was a poor black tobacco farmer whose cells—taken without her knowledge in 1951—became one of the most important tools in medicine, vital for developing the polio vaccine, cloning, gene mapping, in vitro fertilization, and more. Henrietta’s cells have been bought and sold by the billions, yet she remains virtually unknown, and her family can’t afford health insurance."
  • KooturKootur Lynchburg, VAMember UncommonPosts: 135
    You're ignoring scientific fact and pushing pseudoscience conspiracy theories.
  • Thoth_MosheThoth_Moshe Member UncommonPosts: 240
    edited July 3
    Kootur said:
    You're ignoring scientific fact and pushing pseudoscience conspiracy theories.
    What did I show that was was pseudo-science? Please link it.
    Everything I showed was from legit sources such as the Smithsonian, BBC, Cambridge University, National Geographic.  Also I never denied any of those articles, its just you have a lack of understanding of those articles, I am simply making it more clear for you.
    Post edited by Thoth_Moshe on
  • Thoth_MosheThoth_Moshe Member UncommonPosts: 240
    Kootur said:
    You're ignoring scientific fact and pushing pseudoscience conspiracy theories.
    Egypt must have had Gillette lol. I can see the resemblance.
    Image result for egyptian artImage result for body hair
  • KooturKootur Lynchburg, VAMember UncommonPosts: 135
    Kootur said:
    You're ignoring scientific fact and pushing pseudoscience conspiracy theories.
    What did I show that was was pseudo-science? Please link it.
    Everything I showed was from legit sources such as the Smithsonian, BBC, Cambridge University, National Geographic.  Also I never denied any of those articles, its just you have a lack of understanding of those articles, I am simply making it more clear for you.
    No you're trying manipulate data and ignore facts that disprove the afro-centric theory that claims ancient Egypt was black African and not Semitic.

    But why bother you also claim the Indians in America were Negros as well, and the Jews of Israel, I'm surprise you haven't whipped out a black viking theory.
  • Thoth_MosheThoth_Moshe Member UncommonPosts: 240
    Kootur said:
    Kootur said:
    You're ignoring scientific fact and pushing pseudoscience conspiracy theories.
    What did I show that was was pseudo-science? Please link it.
    Everything I showed was from legit sources such as the Smithsonian, BBC, Cambridge University, National Geographic.  Also I never denied any of those articles, its just you have a lack of understanding of those articles, I am simply making it more clear for you.
    No you're trying manipulate data and ignore facts that disprove the afro-centric theory that claims ancient Egypt was black African and not Semitic.

    But why bother you also claim the Indians in America were Negros as well, and the Jews of Israel, I'm surprise you haven't whipped out a black viking theory.
    I didnt manipulate anything, I added prior data from legit sources to make the data in the articles clear. 

    I didnt claim anything, all I did was show old paintings (including depictions of Mayans from actual Mayan temples).  And the Israelites spread out throughout the world after the siege of Jerusalem by the Romans.  I can show the oldest depictions of Israelites also if you wish from Museums.

    Mayan depictions from Mayan temples
    http://www.mexicolore.co.uk/maya/home/the-bonampak-murals

    httpwwwmexicolorecoukimages-7742_01_2jpg
    httpwwwmexicolorecoukimages-7742_07_2jpg
    httpwwwmexicolorecoukimages-7742_10_2jpg
    httpwwwmexicolorecoukimages-7742_15_2jpg
    httpwwwmexicolorecoukimages-7742_17_2jpg
    httpwwwmexicolorecoukimages-7742_14_2jpg

    I can show you the Olmecs too if you want which were a meso-american civilization
    https://www.google.com/#q=olmecs
    The first signs of complex society in Mesoamerica were the Olmecs an ancient Pre-Columbian civilization living in the tropical lowlands of south-central Mexico, in what are roughly the modern-day states of Veracruz and Tabasco.
    Image result for olmecs

    Look what Chinese Scientists are saying about their own DNA


    Kootur
  • Thoth_MosheThoth_Moshe Member UncommonPosts: 240
    edited July 3
    The only thing you are doing is reading the title of an article without fully understanding it and coming to conclusions based on your own bias. I am done with this pointless conversation.  I have given enough data for others to not be fooled by you and others like you who visits this thread.  Believe what you want, none of this information was meant for you.  All your Arguments are weak, when in doubt say words like conspiracy and manipulation, it wouldnt matter how many sources I present.
    Post edited by Thoth_Moshe on
  • SEANMCADSEANMCAD Houston, TXMember EpicPosts: 15,078
    edited July 3
    Kootur said:
    Kind of puts to rest the afro-centric view. It seems the further back you go the more middle-eastern and more European the mummies dna gets.


    what? its always been understood that biblical orgins as well as the birth of civilization came from the middle east. Its just that middle easterners are not ...well...white


    holy blaz this thread is something.

    ok..if you take DNA samples of Egyptian mummies what you will find un-surpringly and painfully obviously is DNA of ...wait for it....EGYPATIANS! and MIDDLE EAST. holy blaz say it isnt so.

    The birth of civilization and biblical stories come from that region of the world. HUMANITY however has orgins that pre-date that.


    face plam
    Post edited by SEANMCAD on

    Do NOT respond to this reply if you think the contents of the reply is unwarranted in this discussion. 

    On replying to the content of this reply you are participating in the discussion of its contents

    Current Ignore List: postlarval, cameltosis, VengeSunsoar

  • KooturKootur Lynchburg, VAMember UncommonPosts: 135
    edited July 3
    The only thing you are doing is reading the title of an article without fully understanding it and coming to conclusions based on your own bias. I am done with this pointless conversation.  I have given enough data for others to not be fooled by you and others like you who visits this thread.  Believe what you want, none of this information was meant for you.  All your Arguments are weak, when in doubt say words like conspiracy and manipulation, it wouldnt matter how many sources I present.
    My arguments aren't weak, I've posted factual data that just reinforces what scientists have already been saying for generations. You post pictures without context to try and disprove that data. You then go on these grandiose tangents about how people are manipulating history. It's the typical behavior of the "we wuz kangs" crowd
    Post edited by Kootur on
  • KooturKootur Lynchburg, VAMember UncommonPosts: 135
    SEANMCAD said:
    Kootur said:
    Kind of puts to rest the afro-centric view. It seems the further back you go the more middle-eastern and more European the mummies dna gets.


    what? its always been understood that biblical orgins as well as the birth of civilization came from the middle east. Its just that middle easterners are not ...well...white


    holy blaz this thread is something.

    ok..if you take DNA samples of Egyptian mummies what you will find un-surpringly and painfully obviously is DNA of ...wait for it....EGYPATIANS! and MIDDLE EAST. holy blaz say it isnt so.

    The birth of civilization and biblical stories come from that region of the world. HUMANITY however has orgins that pre-date that.


    face plam
    There are some people that no matter how many times you show them this data they still claim otherwise.
  • SEANMCADSEANMCAD Houston, TXMember EpicPosts: 15,078
    edited July 3
    Kootur said:
    SEANMCAD said:
    Kootur said:
    Kind of puts to rest the afro-centric view. It seems the further back you go the more middle-eastern and more European the mummies dna gets.


    what? its always been understood that biblical orgins as well as the birth of civilization came from the middle east. Its just that middle easterners are not ...well...white


    holy blaz this thread is something.

    ok..if you take DNA samples of Egyptian mummies what you will find un-surpringly and painfully obviously is DNA of ...wait for it....EGYPATIANS! and MIDDLE EAST. holy blaz say it isnt so.

    The birth of civilization and biblical stories come from that region of the world. HUMANITY however has orgins that pre-date that.


    face plam
    There are some people that no matter how many times you show them this data they still claim otherwise.
    its as if you didnt read what I wrote.

    however to be fair i didnt fully get yours either.


    The likelyhood that Jesus was fair skinned is really low.  Its likely his DNA would have come from....Mesopotamia however humanity was around millions of years before egypt. Sumer is considered the birth of CIVILIZATION...not humanity
    Post edited by SEANMCAD on

    Do NOT respond to this reply if you think the contents of the reply is unwarranted in this discussion. 

    On replying to the content of this reply you are participating in the discussion of its contents

    Current Ignore List: postlarval, cameltosis, VengeSunsoar

  • KooturKootur Lynchburg, VAMember UncommonPosts: 135
    SEANMCAD said:
    Kootur said:
    SEANMCAD said:
    Kootur said:
    Kind of puts to rest the afro-centric view. It seems the further back you go the more middle-eastern and more European the mummies dna gets.


    what? its always been understood that biblical orgins as well as the birth of civilization came from the middle east. Its just that middle easterners are not ...well...white


    holy blaz this thread is something.

    ok..if you take DNA samples of Egyptian mummies what you will find un-surpringly and painfully obviously is DNA of ...wait for it....EGYPATIANS! and MIDDLE EAST. holy blaz say it isnt so.

    The birth of civilization and biblical stories come from that region of the world. HUMANITY however has orgins that pre-date that.


    face plam
    There are some people that no matter how many times you show them this data they still claim otherwise.
    its as if you didnt read what I wrote.

    however to be fair i didnt fully get yours either.


    The likelyhood that Jesus was fair skinned is really low.  Its likely his DNA would have come from....Mesopotamia however humanity was around millions of years before egypt. Sumer is considered the birth of CIVILIZATION...not humanity
    He would have looked like most middle-easterners do same as the ancient Egyptians. He most certainly wasn't part of the negro race as Thoth_Moshe claims many groups around the planet were.
Sign In or Register to comment.