Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Post your benchmark scores/video and PC spec here

13»

Comments

  • ThorbrandThorbrand Member Posts: 1,198
    With everything running in the back groun 11805. Not a very intensive game it looks like.
  • MagiknightMagiknight Member CommonPosts: 782
    My Macbook Pro (early 2011) scored "fairly high," or 2700 something I think. Settings were on maximum. I can still play the game on max settings.
  • Snowdon_CloudripperSnowdon_Cloudripper Member CommonPosts: 584
    Originally posted by Aerowyn
    Originally posted by DarknessReign

    AMD 8350 Overclocked to 4.8 , XFX DD HD7970 Overclocked single GPU ( score was also tweeted :) )

    NICE!:)

     

    http://absoluteretribution.enjin.com/ Guild Website and Recruitment link

  • MikehaMikeha Member EpicPosts: 9,196

    image

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • NiteSkieNiteSkie Member UncommonPosts: 16

    i7 3820: OC to 4.2

    16GB RAM

    GTX 680 OC: 1175 GPU, 3350 Memory(This is my stable gaming OC, Got a little higher with my benchmark OC of: 1225 GPU and 3400 Memory but also got artifacts so it doesn't count, haha).

    120GB OZC SSD

  • ChuckanarChuckanar Member UncommonPosts: 210

    FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Exploration)
    Tested on:3/24/2013 2:47:23 AM
    Score:6427
    Average Framerate:54.836
    Performance:Very High
     -Easily capable of running the game. Should perform exceptionally well, even at higher resolutions.

    Screen Size: 1920x1080
    Screen Mode: Windowed
    Graphics Presets: Custom
    General
    -Improve overall graphic quality. : Disabled
    -Disable rendering of objects when not visible. (Occlusion Culling) : Enabled
    -Use low-detail models on distant objects to increase performance. (LOD) : Enabled
    -Cache LOD data only when necessary. (LOD Streaming) : Enabled
    -Smooth edges. (Anti-aliasing) : Disabled
    -Increase transparent lighting quality. : Disabled
    -Grass Quality : Normal
    Shadows
    -Use low-detail models on shadows to increase performance. (LOD) : Enabled
    -Display : Personal and Environmental
    -Shadow Resolution : Mid: 1024 pixels
    -Shadow Cascading : Normal
    -Shadow Softening : Low
    Texture Detail
    -Texture Filtering : Medium
    -Anisotropic Filtering : Low
    Effects
    -Naturally darken the edges of the screen. (Limb Darkening) : Disabled
    -Blur the graphics around an object in motion. (Radial Blur) : Enabled
    -Effects While in Motion : Display Own
    -Screen Space Ambient Occlusion : Off
    -Glare : Low
    Cinematic Cutscenes
    -Enable depth of field. : Disabled

    System:
    Windows 7 Professional 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.130104-1431)
    Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz
    16382.484MB
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465(VRAM 4050 MB) 9.18.0013.1407

     

     

    I am quite happy honestly. Considering I have been using the same CPU in for last 12 years and this is the second system I have used it in. Also my vid card is not the latest but oh well. Had this current game system for 6 years now and love that I will get yet another game out of it.

    Now to start setting some money aside for the new system.

  • Keitaro333Keitaro333 Member UncommonPosts: 36

    Magiknight:

    I dont think 2700 will be playable. I had around 4000 on max and even then it dropped to about 15 fps in some scenes. And thats just the benchmark. In busy towns or FATEs in the actual game it will be probably even worse. I'd say 5000-6000 is a minimum safe playable score.

     

    Chuckanar:

    That cpu was released around 5 years ago and the gpu 3 years ago. Just saying. Its not THAT old.

     

    My benchmark

    Score: 5689 on High, 1600x1200 (~6100 with OCd GPU)

    Score: 3912 on Maximum, 1600x1200 (~4300 with OCd GPU)

    i7 920 @ 2.67

    12GB DDR3 1333

    nvidia 460gtx SE 1GB

  • Cod_EyeCod_Eye Member UncommonPosts: 1,016
    Originally posted by Keitaro333

    Magiknight:

    I dont think 2700 will be playable. I had around 4000 on max and even then it dropped to about 15 fps in some scenes. And thats just the benchmark. In busy towns or FATEs in the actual game it will be probably even worse. I'd say 5000-6000 is a minimum safe playable score.

     

    Chuckanar:

    That cpu was released around 5 years ago and the gpu 3 years ago. Just saying. Its not THAT old.

     

    My benchmark

    Score: 5689 on High, 1600x1200 (~6100 with OCd GPU)

    Score: 3912 on Maximum, 1600x1200 (~4300 with OCd GPU)

    i7 920 @ 2.67

    12GB DDR3 1333

    nvidia 460gtx SE 1GB

    I have same cpu at same speed, with 8gig ram, but with gtx260.

    i had a res of 1920x1080 full screen.

    my scores were comparible to yours without OC medium settings gave me a score of 6695

    maximum settings gave a score of 2730.

    cpu never got to more than 14% except when it first loaded where it reached around 40%.

    You will have no problem playing ARR with your scores.

     

    my cpu used to be OC'd @ 4.2 but somehow I done something and now isnt OC'd, no idea how to OC the cpu back.

     

  • Indysniper187Indysniper187 Member Posts: 7

    Score:3902

    Average Framerate:31.494

    Performance:High

     -Easily capable of running the game. Should perform well, even at higher resolutions.

     

    Screen Size: 1920x1080

    Graphics Presets: Medium

     

     

    Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7600) (7600.win7_rtm.090713-1255)

    AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 940 Processor

    4095.176MB

    NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT  (VRAM 2797 MB) 9.18.0013.1407    

     

    I know it sucks. Looking to upgrade before release. Is my processor good??

     

Sign In or Register to comment.