Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Fuzzy Avatars Solved! Please re-upload your avatar if it was fuzzy!

Oh look another amateur, rambling opinion piece....

bunnyhopperbunnyhopper LondonPosts: 2,751Member

So advanced apologies for this TL:DR incoherent ramble folks!



Preamble:

I'd like to clarify this (highly subjective) opinion piece (I hesitate to call it a review as I am not giving it a score or recommending, or not, people play the game), with a few bits of information about where I am coming from as an mmo player.

Traditionally I am a pvp centric player (I enjoy all forms of pvp from esports through economic pvp to ffa full loot games) who leans heavily towards sandbox mmos. But don't let that put you off, I didn't buy GW2 simply to hate it (I quite enjoy it actually) and I will endeavour not to colour my opinions on the game in this little ramble by comparing it to sandbox mmos or their mechanics (and no I wont be mentioning WoW either).

In terms of my own progression within the game (as that normally gets asked when someone comes out with something along these lines). Well I have a "full exotic 80 warrior looking for Arah farm!" replete with 400AS and 400WS and 92% map completion, as well as having quite a bit of experience running a combo machine Ele.



The Game World, PVE/Dungeons:
    The Game World -
    Pros -
It looks great, it sounds great and the general styling of it is impressive. If there is any repeat terrain then it is hidden away well enough not to really notice it, or for it to not impinge on your gameplay in any meaningful way.

There are lots of little things going on that if you take the time to notice them, add nicely to the whole immersion factor.


    Cons -
The zones... yeah I know, I know, they are there for ease of accessibility and to "guide" the player through the game. But the fact they are all pretty much "bricked off" really, really kills world immersion for me and pushes home the fact that it seems like a big ride, you enter one end, get churned out at the other. Surely they could have removed the walls and had the zones still hold in terms of npc power level and name alone?


The mob spacing, is there really any need for placing one mob on every square inch of ground in Orr? Is it meant to make walking through the end zone more difficult? Because it doesn't, it just makes it a pain in the ass and promotes using waypoints as much as possible. It can't be to promote farming as most of the mobs drop next to FA in relation to the sheer amount of them out there.


Jumping and getting stuck. If you are going to promote people jumping about and exploring, don't have it so your character can't jump/walk up even the most gradual of slopes, or get stuck in suddenly spawning machinery in a DE. This is a really, really small gripe in honesty but it can be rather annoying.

    PVE/Dungeons -
    Pros -
Dynamic Events are fun and offer another line of progression within the PVE field. It is also nice to see people grouped in the same area working at the same goal without constant bickering and a struggle for Teh Lootz.


Whilst the heart quests are pretty much kill/gather/escort, you don't have to track back from A to B to A again which is an improvement. Generally they felt more natural and flexible than standard quest chains, whether that was an actual mechanical freedom (which I expect it wasn't) doesn't matter all that much, as it felt a better experience regardless.


Dungeons pose a level of challenge which makes for a refreshing change and promotes intergroup work.


    Cons -
The AI is nothing to write home about, mobs seem to cycle through their abilities regardless as to what is actually going on. For example NPCS use pull specials regardless as to your proximity to them. Champions either have a zerg to death special (hello Eye of Zhaitan) or easily avoidable special cycles. Speaking of pulls...


The pulls and snares are frankly, waaaay OTT. What the hell is the point of a 40+ second snare stack from a random mob? Why does every single mob (exaggeration alert) in Orr have pulls and stuns? Again it doesn't actually make traveling through Orr difficult, it just makes it a major pain in the ass.


The story missions seem to actively promote people going in and just soloing down one mob at a time, reseting then soloing down the next mob. Now I am normally completely against difficulty levels in mmos (if you must have them, have insulting titles for them like the good old days :p), but in this case they seem a better option then the "only the player resets" mechanic. Yes most can get through them a breeze, but if not don't worry just die alot and you'll get there sooner or later.


Speaking of the story, (the Human one at least) is really, really poor. Just really cringeworthy. I did mention this was highly subjective didn't I?


Combat - Holy lack of trinity Batman!:
        

This little topic seems to have been raised a hundred times already on these and other forums, as well as in the game itself. For me the lack of trinity is a bonus. The ability to pick and choose specs regardless of class is a freedom well worth having. But I have to question, just how much room for maneuver is there really?


I'm not an expert at playing every class (or one of them for that matter lol) I'd like to state that I may be way off on this one, but it seems to me that basically, people are speccing into bastardised DPS/Tank/Healer/CC roles anyway and that certain classes are better at certain "roles". As such we don't see groups of 5 necros all doing different roles, we still see classes speccing into the traditional roles you would expect.


I'm not putting that forward as a negative, I just wonder if all the hoo-ha being made about the lack of trinity (from both the pro and con camps) is really warranted.


    Pros -
Generally the combat is slick with nice animations.


Weapon switching is a good mechanic and allows for experimentation. With regards to that, it is pleasing that it is easy to unlock all the weapon skills, for me the more time a player has to work with the skills the better accustomed they will be with them by end game.


The combo system is a great idea, I love the fact it promotes the need for people to actually think about working with others. It also adds something nice for those people who pay a bit of attention to the immediate environment as well as giving another element to help distinguish good, experienced groups.


The dodge system is fluid and works well, again promoting the idea of the player actually dynamically reacting to the environment.


    Cons -
95% of the game (made up statistics alert!) seems to promote mindless zerging of the very worst kind. DE's, yeah they are zergs, story mode is a zerg or rez zerg (thanks to the only the player resets faceroll if you want mechanic). WvWvW is for the main part a big old zerg (yes you get zergs in OWPvP but it seems to have been actively pushed in WvWvW). Even the pug random sPvP matches (yes I know they are shit in all games) seem more (dps)zerg orientated than usual.


Someone (yeah I know being overly confident anyone will respond TL:DR lulz) will no doubt point to the fact that dungeons are challenging, or that tourny sPvP is challenging. But are we really saying that outside of a couple of elements that it is alright for everything else to be just one massive zergathon?


Given they have thrown in area awareness elements and dodge, I think personally they could have gone the whole hog and gone FPS aiming. Many will disagree with that no doubt.

WvWvW:
 Well if it brings larger scale, more open pvp to the consciouness of the masses then that is a good thing. It is not such a good thing if it has multihour queues, door zergs and a hilariously bad espionage system.


 Let's start with the queues. The fact of the matter is that ANET should have anticipated demand and they should have been aware that not enforcing caps on servers from the start was a bad idea. It is also certainly the case that they should not be coming out and mentioning people moving server when they have not first laid out clear plans for server caps, destination server mechanics et al. Still this is improving and should continue to improve.


The pvp itself can be quite enjoyable, but the combination of the reward system and the objective format seems to have ensured that it is one massive zerg fest. Why roam around looking for open combat when everyone is getting points zerging a fort?  


The trouble is that unless an RvR lake is handled exceptionally well it is just better off having full on open war servers or sticking to arena pvp. The "spying" going on in the game is indicative of the issues. You can spy on other servers and they can spy on you and yet there is little real recourse. You can't whomp on the spy, you can't stop him logging into the zone. I love the spying/espionage/dirty tactics of open pvp games, I am not so fond of this incarnation.

 

The worst thing being, you see that guy spying, that guy logged in working for the other side? Well he is taking someone elses place, someone who wants to try and pvp a bit is instead stuck in a queue because someone from another server is logged to "pass intel".


So whilst WvWvW can be fun, it seems fundamentally flawed.

sPvP:
I'll state here and now that I am only really just getting into the sPvP aspects of the game and have been restricted to running the hotjoin matches via the npc. As such it has been pugs all the way and clearly that is going to temper my expectations.


Generally the whole idea of sPvP in GW2 seems to be well done. I like the idea that everyone is immediately 80, that everyone has access to the same gear and that you can't unlock better stats. I enjoy esports and think that if you are going to go for that, it needs to be based on esport principles and not traditional mmo principles.


 The whole thing does feel a bit dps heavy currently, but again that is because I have been running in non tourny pugs.


 My only real concern (as with all mmos) is why would someone who is dedicated to esports, do them in this game? The whole idea of GW2 seems to be pick it up and get into what you want to do straight away. That is fantastic, the problem is that if I want to jump into some pvp arena I can just jump into an FPS/RTS or some purely dedicated esport game with ladders/rankings.

 

I am not doubting in anyway the credentials of those taking part in GW2 tournys, there will be far better players and teams in there then I will ever be, I just don't really understand quite why there are there.

Crafting and the Economy:
Probably the worst thing about the game, although having said that it does bring some cool stuff to the table and I didn't expect much from it in the first place.
    Pros -
    The ability to bank and use collections tabs for crafting resources is great.
    The discovery idea is a solid one.
    The sheer range of stuff to make is good.


    Cons -
    Most of it is completely and utterly pointless in the long run.
    See all those resources selling? They are selling because people are grinding up to 400. There is little point to any of it once you hit 400 mind you unless you really care about legendaries and if that is the extent of the need for crafting..

I got use out of AS as I wanted to craft myself the Knights Draconic set for stats, now that I have the skill is pretty much redundant. I get more selling raw mats on the TP then I would do bothering to craft most stuff. To be honest though, I didn't expect anything at all from crafting/economy in a themepark game so it is not an issue.

The Grind:
 All mmos have a grind (or more), some are more extensive than others. Guild Wars 2 is no different. People grind for dungeon tokens, they grind renown, they grind for Legendaries and they grind crafting professions.


 For the main part, the grind is truly optional and I personally cannot see how anyone can use the need to grind as a legitimate complaint against this game. BUT I do find some players within the game are somewhat disingenuous when they talk about just how frequent grinding is. If you actually get down to the nitty gritty, alot of people within the game are actually grinding away.

The cash shop:
No issue with it at all, doesn't seem pushed down my throat and nothing in there that overly worries me about not having.

The fact you can trade IG currency for gems is also a bonus. If I ever fancied something I have the option of slowly making enough IG to get it. So long as the items are xp boosters (like I care someone gets "first" before me) or vanity items it is a non issue for me.

This kind of game is simply suited to the model. That is the important factor, some games suit it, some simply don't. In this instance it works.

Conclusion:
 I may be slow (and old and boring) but I got there in the end. As themeparks go this is a good one, but it is not without it's issues.

The world is attractive but for me really doesn't feel like a world at all and is far too pigeonholed (my sandbox background kicking in, but on subjective feelings like this it can't be helped).
    
The combat is fluid and does offer the potential for some interesting group interplay but I have to question some of the hyperbole we see about it. And far too much of the game stays around the faceroll requirement level.

The pvp is both accessible and enjoyable (quite often). Though WvWvW feels like a missed opportunity. I have to applaud the fact that they have removed levels/gear as a consideration from sPvP, although (outside of high ranked tournys) it seems more about the accesibility then anything else really.

Indeed the main theme for the game seems to be that it is accessible and it allows you to jump into whatever you fancy once you log in (WvWvW queues aside). That is a great thing, but it leaves you feeling somewhat cold when you are looking for anything like a persistent game world in your mmo. It is a filler game, or a second game, something to run alongside a main mmo or to pass the downtime between FPS matches etc.

9/10 as a themepark/pass time game,  4/10 as a persistent world mmo. Oh right I said I wouldn't give it a score... I lied.

"Come and have a look at what you could have won."

Comments

  • NadiaNadia Canonsburg, PAPosts: 11,866Member Common
    Originally posted by bunnyhopper

    So advanced apologies for this TL:DR incoherent ramble folks!

    i read the whole thing :)

    i appreciated the pros and cons

  • KarteliKarteli Providence, PAPosts: 2,646Member

    I guess it is ammusing when you consider ArenaNet prided themselves on building a game that would compete with current WoW (and not 2004 WoW), yet they lack all the social features for seeing where people are currently playing and what gear they are using. inspect (equipment grade and upgrades)? /who? compare achievements? search for everyone playing with a specific guild tag?  It's not this alone that makes GW2 a boring & lonely experience ... it's all the 1000 paper cuts combined that make me not feeling like logging on.

     

    As for the trinity, I guess I don't understand the mentality behind bashing it out of existence.

    As a DnD / ADnD player, MUD player, and MMO'er, I can see why each class had/has specific roles.  It made each participant important and needed in some way.

    Everyone more or less seems to have some kind of cookie cutter "class" in GW2 without the trinity.  Nobody cares who you are or what skills you have, you are simply needed because some make-shift group needs a few warm bodies to beat this boss. /shrug GW2 could easily be converted into a console game, considering how it lacks the complexity of other MMO's (even MMO's I don't like or no longer play).

    Want a nice understanding of life? Try Spirit Science: "The Human History"
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8NNHmV3QPw&feature=plcp
    Recognize the voice? Yep sounds like Penny Arcade's Extra Credits.

  • RictisRictis UnknownPosts: 1,231Member Uncommon

    What no pictures? image. Thanks for the review.

     

    EDIT: I thoroughly enjoy reviews that have pros and cons, because there is a positive and negative to every aspect. Great job to that end.

  • bunnyhopperbunnyhopper LondonPosts: 2,751Member
    Originally posted by Nadia
    Originally posted by bunnyhopper

     

    i read the whole thing :)

    i appreciated the pros and cons

    It is a bit of a wall of text effort so thanks for taking the time :)

    "Come and have a look at what you could have won."

  • KiljaedenasKiljaedenas New Westminster, BCPosts: 468Member
    I read the whole thing too, and it seems like a pretty accurate down-to-earth review to me. Good comparison of pros and cons, and also being a sandboxer myself I can definitely relate to the lack of open-world feeling. Enough so that I think I won't even bother with this one. Thanks for the heads-up.

    Where's the any key?

  • RictisRictis UnknownPosts: 1,231Member Uncommon
    I am curious how old you are OP, I only ask because I got my father in law into MMORPGs by using this game as a stepping stone. I was originally going to have him play WoW as a first game but was worried he would be overwhelmed. I wonder if companies will change their target audience to older generations now that some of the gaming community is getting older.
  • EvilGeekEvilGeek londonPosts: 1,227Member Uncommon

    Read the whole thing, enjoyed reading it, nicely written and appreciate your pros and cons, no game is perfect :)

    image
  • bcbullybcbully Westland, MIPosts: 8,281Member Uncommon
    Originally posted by bunnyhopper

     

    9/10 as a themepark/pass time game,  4/10 as a persistent world mmoRPG. Oh right I said I wouldn't give it a score... I lied.

    fixed that for you and I agree.

  • KyleranKyleran Tampa, FLPosts: 20,008Member Uncommon

    Good review, thanks for writing it up.

     

     

    In my day MMORPG's were so hard we fought our way through dungeons in the snow, uphill both ways.
    "I don't have one life, I have many lives" - Grunty
    Still currently "subscribed" to EVE, and only EVE!!!
    "This is the most intelligent, well qualified and articulate response to a post I have ever seen on these forums. It's a shame most people here won't have the attention span to read past the second line." - Anon

  • bunnyhopperbunnyhopper LondonPosts: 2,751Member
    Originally posted by Wakygreek
    I am curious how old you are OP, I only ask because I got my father in law into MMORPGs by using this game as a stepping stone. I was originally going to have him play WoW as a first game but was worried he would be overwhelmed. I wonder if companies will change their target audience to older generations now that some of the gaming community is getting older.

    32.

     

    You do raise an interesting point. I've partaken of the genre for many a year now so it is easy to forget what it would be like for someone coming into the genre fresh. Using a game as a stepping stone seems like a good idea.

     

    I'm not sure though what kind of mmo would suit the "older" generation as it is probably just down to individual preference. Although I would imagine that less twitch and more social interaction would probably be the order of the day.

     

    I think the whole "older gamer" thing is more to do with when someone got into the genre as opposed to their age (at least around here) i.e. "look at those old, bitter UO vets (like me), they need to move with the times".

    "Come and have a look at what you could have won."

  • FoomerangFoomerang Portland, ORPosts: 5,565Member Uncommon

    Nice review. Def feelin ya regarding the virtual world bit. I think this game's strenghts lies in its accessibility, deep combat, and quality graphics/artwork. All the makings of a solid game. I look for more in an mmo, so that is why i am holding off for now. They have a lot of key features in place already, hopefully they flesh it out in the years to come. Will be interesting to see.

  • austriacusaustriacus limaPosts: 624Member

    OP you made me shed some tears of joy. Finally someone that can put a valid review with cons and negatives.

    Just one little thing, you asked why would anyone looking for pvp hop in this game instead of going to a fps or rts. Well the answer is in your question. There is no real competitive esport pvp with MMO like gameplay and thats why people are exited for that part of the game. Its like asking why would you play a RTS if you have FPS.

  • NBlitzNBlitz ZwollePosts: 1,904Member
    Originally posted by bunnyhopper

    The Game World, PVE/Dungeons:
        The Game World -

        Cons -
    The zones... yeah I know, I know, they are there for ease of accessibility and to "guide" the player through the game. But the fact they are all pretty much "bricked off" really, really kills world immersion for me and pushes home the fact that it seems like a big ride, you enter one end, get churned out at the other. Surely they could have removed the walls and had the zones still hold in terms of npc power level and name alone?


    Conclusion:
    The world is attractive but for me really doesn't feel like a world at all and is far too pigeonholed (my sandbox background kicking in, but on subjective feelings like this it can't be helped).

    9/10 as a themepark/pass time game,  4/10 as a persistent world mmo. Oh right I said I wouldn't give it a score... I lied.

    Aside from your well balanced review I'd like to comment on one part of the game that bothers me and that you touched lightly upon when you were talking about Orr.

    The waypoint / travelling system...ANet's obsession with streamlining everything ends up hurting the game more in the long run. At first I thought it was pretty neat. "Oh, I can port there in the blink of an eye and some coin." The higher my level gets, the more I start seeing it as a pain.

    Not to mention that I may be all the way south of Kessex Hills and after completing a part of my story quest I have to see Logan's mug again but (!!!) in Salma District (human home).

    There are speed buffs in the form of passive skills and weapon skills that give you a temporary speed buff. BUT, to have to rely on that because you want to save some coin it's...it's....well, I don't like it.

    It has to be kept up and it doesn't compare to having a steady speed mount in any way, shape or form. 

     

    /For the zealots out there, this is all IMO of course.

  • ConnmacartConnmacart OsloPosts: 681Member Uncommon

    Maybe you'd like to tell what to you is a persistant world? That is the only thing I can't put into perpective when it comes to GW2.

    To me the GW2 world is one of the very few worlds that is actually a world. If you were to be able to recreate it in the real world it would work for the most part. Cities are cities, Towns are towns and outposts are outposts. Mobs can fight eachother. You complain about Orr being riddled with enemies. Well it is the enemy stronghold. It rose up from the depths of the sea. The risen are undead and for the most part mindless so they wander all over the place. If they didn't wouldn't that be a glaring lack in immersion.

    About the zones being basically boxed. It would have meant a complete new game engine and not a massive rewrite. It would also mean 2 more years of development and testing if they had wanted to remove the borders from zones. You don't have to like it, but it doesn't really make the gameworld any less persistant. 

  • YamotaYamota LondonPosts: 6,620Member
    A nice, well written review. I enjoyed reading it.
  • ShakyMoShakyMo BradfordPosts: 7,207Member
    The thing with WvW, though it has some flaws, if you like large scale pvp its the best implementation of it in years.

    It's better than
    War rvr lakes
    Aions abyss
    Wows half hearted on a timer stuff like lwg
    tsws fusang
    (lol) illum

    It's not as good as daoc frontiers or planetside 1 though
  • evilastroevilastro EdinburghPosts: 4,270Member
    Originally posted by Karteli

    I guess it is ammusing when you consider ArenaNet prided themselves on building a game that would compete with current WoW (and not 2004 WoW), yet they lack all the social features for seeing where people are currently playing and what gear they are using. inspect (equipment grade and upgrades)? /who? compare achievements? search for everyone playing with a specific guild tag?  It's not this alone that makes GW2 a boring & lonely experience ... it's all the 1000 paper cuts combined that make me not feeling like logging on.

     

    As for the trinity, I guess I don't understand the mentality behind bashing it out of existence.

    As a DnD / ADnD player, MUD player, and MMO'er, I can see why each class had/has specific roles.  It made each participant important and needed in some way.

    Everyone more or less seems to have some kind of cookie cutter "class" in GW2 without the trinity.  Nobody cares who you are or what skills you have, you are simply needed because some make-shift group needs a few warm bodies to beat this boss. /shrug GW2 could easily be converted into a console game, considering how it lacks the complexity of other MMO's (even MMO's I don't like or no longer play).

    1) Gearscore is pointless in GW2 and I dont think ANet want to associate themselves with the pseudo-elitist douchbaggery from WoW. I say pseudo because gear made the man in that game, the content was laughably easy once you had the right Gearscore. How does this make it a lonely and boring experience? You can chat to players, group with players... do pretty much anything else actually social from another game, you just cant be a pseudo-elitist douche.

     

    2) DnD and ADnD did not have a trinity until the latest version, which basically copied it from videogames, rather than the other way around.

    3) People do care what skills you have when you are doing explorable dungeons.

    4) Lacks the complexity of other games? What is complicated about a trinity? Its less complicated, you have a role and you do it, theres no crossover. In GW2 everyone has to manage self healing, tanking, dpsing and support as a team. You dont get a free ride while you spam your supermacro as a DPS class.

  • DamzillaDamzilla MostarPosts: 175Member Common
    Nicely written. Just stopped by to say that :D
  • bunnyhopperbunnyhopper LondonPosts: 2,751Member
    Originally posted by Damzilla
    Nicely written. Just stopped by to say that :D

    Thanks (to everyone for the nice comments so far) :)

    "Come and have a look at what you could have won."

  • bunnyhopperbunnyhopper LondonPosts: 2,751Member
    Originally posted by Connmacart

    Maybe you'd like to tell what to you is a persistant world? That is the only thing I can't put into perpective when it comes to GW2.

    To me the GW2 world is one of the very few worlds that is actually a world. If you were to be able to recreate it in the real world it would work for the most part. Cities are cities, Towns are towns and outposts are outposts. Mobs can fight eachother. You complain about Orr being riddled with enemies. Well it is the enemy stronghold. It rose up from the depths of the sea. The risen are undead and for the most part mindless so they wander all over the place. If they didn't wouldn't that be a glaring lack in immersion.

    About the zones being basically boxed. It would have meant a complete new game engine and not a massive rewrite. It would also mean 2 more years of development and testing if they had wanted to remove the borders from zones. You don't have to like it, but it doesn't really make the gameworld any less persistant. 

    Taking aside the whole player/social meta game and what that does to generate the feeling of a persistent world (as that simply isn't to be expected in a themepark). I think it is the general over all design of the game world which is the issue.

     

    If you are going to have zones, why the need for them to all be boxes with completely artificial looking boundaries around them? Look at the game world map for Darkfall, it wouldn't look out of place on a cartographers desk. Now look at the GW2 game world....

     

    Moving from zone to zone in GW2 just feels completely artificial and guided (all of this is subjective ofc). Even within the zones it all seems to structured with a massive amount of impassable terrain, not aided by your inability to get up a slope with even the slightest of gradients.

     

    I'll reiterate again, "feeling" of a game world is highly subjective, just for me it really, really doesn't feel like one. Even though as I have pointed out, the art design in general is nice and it has nice little touches in terms of npc  dialogue etc. But at no point does it feel persistent (even the WvWvW seems transitory), nor does it feel like a "world".

     

    It's not a big negative to aim at the game (in my opinion) because I really don't expect the game to offer that sense of world and persistency, as it doesn't strike me as that is what it is about. But they could have made the map a bit more natural and the transitions a bit less obvious.

    "Come and have a look at what you could have won."

  • LoktofeitLoktofeit Stone Mountain, GAPosts: 13,672Member Uncommon

    I normally don't read long, rambling pieces but I'm glad I read this one. It wasn't really a ramble at all. I don't agree with some of the points but really agree with quite a few of them (ex: the walled off areas bothers me, too). It was interesting to read a view of the game from someone who has high level experience with most of the aspects of it.

    Thanks, BH!

     

    There isn't a "right" or "wrong" way to play, if you want to use a screwdriver to put nails into wood, have at it, simply don't complain when the guy next to you with the hammer is doing it much better and easier. - Allein
    "Graphics are often supplied by Engines that (some) MMORPG's are built in" - Spuffyre

  • ConnmacartConnmacart OsloPosts: 681Member Uncommon
    Originally posted by bunnyhopper
    Originally posted by Connmacart

    Maybe you'd like to tell what to you is a persistant world? That is the only thing I can't put into perpective when it comes to GW2.

    To me the GW2 world is one of the very few worlds that is actually a world. If you were to be able to recreate it in the real world it would work for the most part. Cities are cities, Towns are towns and outposts are outposts. Mobs can fight eachother. You complain about Orr being riddled with enemies. Well it is the enemy stronghold. It rose up from the depths of the sea. The risen are undead and for the most part mindless so they wander all over the place. If they didn't wouldn't that be a glaring lack in immersion.

    About the zones being basically boxed. It would have meant a complete new game engine and not a massive rewrite. It would also mean 2 more years of development and testing if they had wanted to remove the borders from zones. You don't have to like it, but it doesn't really make the gameworld any less persistant. 

    Taking aside the whole player/social meta game and what that does to generate the feeling of a persistent world (as that simply isn't to be expected in a themepark). I think it is the general over all design of the game world which is the issue.

     

    If you are going to have zones, why the need for them to all be boxes with completely artificial looking boundaries around them? Look at the game world map for Darkfall, it wouldn't look out of place on a cartographers desk. Now look at the GW2 game world....

     

    Moving from zone to zone in GW2 just feels completely artificial and guided (all of this is subjective ofc). Even within the zones it all seems to structured with a massive amount of impassable terrain, not aided by your inability to get up a slope with even the slightest of gradients.

     

    I'll reiterate again, "feeling" of a game world is highly subjective, just for me it really, really doesn't feel like one. Even though as I have pointed out, the art design in general is nice and it has nice little touches in terms of npc  dialogue etc. But at no point does it feel persistent (even the WvWvW seems transitory), nor does it feel like a "world".

     

    It's not a big negative to aim at the game (in my opinion) because I really don't expect the game to offer that sense of world and persistency, as it doesn't strike me as that is what it is about. But they could have made the map a bit more natural and the transitions a bit less obvious.

    More or less what I thought, but I needed some confirmation. Your perceivement of the world though doesn't actually have anything to do with its persistance. GW2 has a persistant world. As in it's there even if you are not. So maybe you are looking for some other word. 

  • bunnyhopperbunnyhopper LondonPosts: 2,751Member
    Originally posted by Connmacart
    Originally posted by bunnyhopper
    Originally posted by Connmacart
     

    More or less what I thought, but I needed some confirmation. Your perceivement of the world though doesn't actually have anything to do with its persistance. GW2 has a persistant world. As in it's there even if you are not. So maybe you are looking for some other word. 

    Perhaps. Clearly the game is always there, regardless as to whether I log in or not. But in terms of the "persistency" I meant, well that comes more from settling houses, altering the terrain, taking over and holding for as long as you can parts of the map. That kind of stuff makes a game feel persitent to me and I'm not really leveling it as a gripe at this game because it's not the kind of stuff the game is aiming at.

     

    Given I don't expect the above, I guess my only issue with the world design is in the physical aspect of that design (i.e. map/zone/transition elements which I think could have been made to feel less artifical).

    "Come and have a look at what you could have won."

  • grimalgrimal Stamford, CTPosts: 2,873Member Uncommon
    Originally posted by bunnyhopper

    9/10 as a themepark/pass time game,  4/10 as a persistent world mmo. Oh right I said I wouldn't give it a score... I lied.

    Nice to see my opinion isn't alone.

    P.S. Really nice review.

  • IntheShadowsIntheShadows North YorkshirePosts: 58Member

    Thank you, I enjoyed reading your review.

    One thing that stuck out in my mind that you said, that I agree with 100%, is about the zones. I absolutely hate the amount of load screens and how each zone is in a neat little box. It makes the world feel very disjointed. 

Sign In or Register to comment.